NM HB 95
enactedADDITIONAL SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIP
New Mexico · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did NM HB 95 pass?
Yes. NM HB 95 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-03-05): Signed
What is NM HB 95 about?
NM HB 95 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “ADDITIONAL SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIP”.
Who sponsors NM HB 95?
Hochman-Vigil, Dayan is the primary sponsor of NM HB 95.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-16
- Latest action
- 2026-03-05 — Signed
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Hochman-Vigil, Dayanprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-05
Signed
executive-signature
2026-02-19
House concurred in Senate amendments
2026-02-18
passed Senate
passage
2026-02-17
DO PASS committee report adopted
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-15
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-05
Sent to Senate Judiciary Committee & Senate Finance Committee
introduction,referral-committee
2026-02-05
passed House
passage
2026-02-05
floor substitute adopted (1 amendment)
2026-02-02
DO PASS committee report adopted
committee-passage-favorable
2026-01-28
DO PASS committee report adopted
committee-passage-favorable
2026-01-22
Sent to House Government, Elections and Indian Affairs Committee & House Judiciary Committee
introduction,referral-committee
2026-01-16
Sent to House Pre-file
introduction,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
Votes
house passage
2026-02-05 · pass · 65-0
Member-level votes (70)
- Abeyta: yes
- Anaya: yes
- Anyanonu: yes
- Armstrong: yes
- Baca: yes
- Block: yes
- Borrego: yes
- Brown: yes
- Cadena: yes
- Cates: yes
- Chandler: yes
- Chatfield: yes
- Chavez, N.: yes
- Cullen: yes
- De La Cruz: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Dow: yes
- Duncan: yes
- Ferrary: yes
- Gallegos: yes
- Garcia, M.: yes
- Garratt: yes
- Gonzales: yes
- Gurrola: yes
- Hall II: yes
- Henry: yes
- Hernandez, JF: yes
- Hernandez, JN: yes
- Herndon: yes
- Herrera: yes
- Hochman-Vigil: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Jones: yes
- Lara: yes
- Lente: yes
- Little: yes
- Lord: yes
- Lujan: yes
- Martinez, A.: yes
- Martínez, J.: yes
- Mason: yes
- Matthews: yes
- McQueen: yes
- Mejia: yes
- Mirabal Moya: yes
- Montoya: yes
- Murphy: yes
- Ortez: yes
- Parajón: yes
- Reeb: yes
- Romero, A.: yes
- Romero, GA: yes
- Roybal Caballero: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Sariñana: yes
- Sena Cortez: yes
- Serrato: yes
- Silva: yes
- Small: yes
- Szczepanski: yes
- Terrazas: yes
- Thomson: yes
- Torres-Velásquez: yes
- Vincent: yes
- Zamora: yes
- Chávez, E.: excused
- García, MP: excused
- Lundstrom: excused
- Pettigrew: excused
- Rubio: excused
senate passage
2026-02-18 · pass · 40-0
Member-level votes (42)
- BERGHMANS: yes
- BLOCK: yes
- BOONE: yes
- BRANDT: yes
- BRANTLEY: yes
- CAMPOS: yes
- CERVANTES: yes
- CHARLEY: yes
- DUHIGG: yes
- EZZELL: yes
- FIGUEROA: yes
- GALLEGOS: yes
- GONZALES: yes
- HAMBLEN: yes
- HICKEY: yes
- JARAMILLO: yes
- LÓPEZ: yes
- MAESTAS: yes
- MUÑOZ: yes
- NAVA: yes
- O'MALLEY: yes
- PADILLA: yes
- PINTO: yes
- POPE, JR.: yes
- RAMOS: yes
- SANCHEZ: yes
- SCOTT: yes
- SEDILLO-LOPEZ: yes
- SHARER: yes
- SHENDO, JR.: yes
- SOULES: yes
- STEFANICS: yes
- STEINBORN: yes
- STEWART: yes
- THORNTON: yes
- TOBIASSEN: yes
- TOWNSEND: yes
- TRUJILLO: yes
- WILSON: yes
- WIRTH: yes
- LANIER: absent
- WOODS: absent
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:28:06.602582Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=NM&identifier=HB 95. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.