NE LB 641
enactedChange provisions relating to medicaid estate recovery
Nebraska · 2026 Regular Session (109th Legislature, 2nd Session) · legislature
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did NE LB 641 pass?
Yes. NE LB 641 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-05-21): Approved by Governor on May 20, 2025
What is NE LB 641 about?
NE LB 641 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session (109th Legislature, 2nd Session) titled “Change provisions relating to medicaid estate recovery”.
Who sponsors NE LB 641?
Bostar is the primary sponsor of NE LB 641.
- Introduced
- 2025-01-22
- Latest action
- 2025-05-21 — Approved by Governor on May 20, 2025
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Bostarprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-05-21
Approved by Governor on May 20, 2025
executive-signature
2025-05-14
Dispensing of reading at large approved
2025-05-14
Passed on Final Reading 49-0-0
passage
2025-05-14
President/Speaker signed
passage
2025-05-14
Presented to Governor on May 14, 2025
executive-receipt
2025-05-12
Placed on Final Reading
reading-3
2025-05-08
Advanced to Enrollment and Review for Engrossment
2025-05-07
Placed on Select File
filing
2025-05-01
Bostar AM672 to AM538 filed
filing
2025-05-01
Bostar AM672 adopted
2025-05-01
Judiciary AM538 adopted
2025-05-01
Advanced to Enrollment and Review Initial
2025-03-17
Speaker priority bill
2025-03-13
Placed on General File with AM538
committee-passage
2025-03-13
Judiciary AM538 filed
filing
2025-02-06
Notice of hearing for March 06, 2025
2025-01-24
Referred to Judiciary Committee
referral-committee
2025-01-22
Date of introduction
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Bostar AM672 adopted
2025-05-01 · fail · 37-0
Member-level votes (49)
- Andersen: yes
- DeKay: yes
- Juarez: yes
- Riepe: yes
- Arch: yes
- Dorn: yes
- Kauth: yes
- Sanders: yes
- Ballard: yes
- Dover: yes
- Lippincott: yes
- Sorrentino: yes
- Bosn: yes
- Hallstrom: yes
- Lonowski: yes
- Storm: yes
- Bostar: yes
- Hansen: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Strommen: yes
- Brandt: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Moser: yes
- von Gillern: yes
- Cavanaugh, J.: yes
- Holdcroft: yes
- Murman: yes
- Wordekemper: yes
- Clements: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Prokop: yes
- Clouse: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Quick: yes
- DeBoer: yes
- Jacobson: yes
- Raybould: yes
- Storer: excused
- Armendariz: abstain
- Dungan: abstain
- Ibach: abstain
- Rountree: abstain
- Cavanaugh, M.: abstain
- Fredrickson: abstain
- McKeon: abstain
- Spivey: abstain
- Conrad: abstain
- Guereca: abstain
- McKinney: abstain
Judiciary AM538 adopted
2025-05-01 · fail · 37-0
Member-level votes (49)
- Andersen: yes
- Dorn: yes
- Juarez: yes
- Riepe: yes
- Ballard: yes
- Dover: yes
- Kauth: yes
- Sanders: yes
- Bosn: yes
- Dungan: yes
- Lippincott: yes
- Sorrentino: yes
- Bostar: yes
- Hallstrom: yes
- Lonowski: yes
- Storm: yes
- Brandt: yes
- Hansen: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Strommen: yes
- Cavanaugh, J.: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Moser: yes
- von Gillern: yes
- Clements: yes
- Holdcroft: yes
- Murman: yes
- Wordekemper: yes
- Clouse: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Prokop: yes
- DeBoer: yes
- Ibach: yes
- Quick: yes
- DeKay: yes
- Jacobson: yes
- Raybould: yes
- Storer: excused
- Arch: abstain
- Conrad: abstain
- Hunt: abstain
- Rountree: abstain
- Armendariz: abstain
- Fredrickson: abstain
- McKeon: abstain
- Spivey: abstain
- Cavanaugh, M.: abstain
- Guereca: abstain
- McKinney: abstain
Advanced to Enrollment and Review Initial
2025-05-01 · pass · 39-0
Member-level votes (49)
- Andersen: yes
- DeKay: yes
- Ibach: yes
- Quick: yes
- Arch: yes
- Dorn: yes
- Jacobson: yes
- Raybould: yes
- Ballard: yes
- Dover: yes
- Juarez: yes
- Riepe: yes
- Bosn: yes
- Dungan: yes
- Kauth: yes
- Sanders: yes
- Bostar: yes
- Hallstrom: yes
- Lippincott: yes
- Sorrentino: yes
- Brandt: yes
- Hansen: yes
- Lonowski: yes
- Storm: yes
- Cavanaugh, J.: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Strommen: yes
- Clements: yes
- Holdcroft: yes
- Moser: yes
- von Gillern: yes
- Clouse: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Murman: yes
- Wordekemper: yes
- DeBoer: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Prokop: yes
- Storer: excused
- Armendariz: abstain
- Fredrickson: abstain
- McKinney: abstain
- Cavanaugh, M.: abstain
- Guereca: abstain
- Rountree: abstain
- Conrad: abstain
- McKeon: abstain
- Spivey: abstain
Passed on Final Reading 49-0-0
2025-05-14 · pass · 49-0
Member-level votes (49)
- Andersen: yes
- DeKay: yes
- Jacobson: yes
- Riepe: yes
- Arch: yes
- Dorn: yes
- Juarez: yes
- Rountree: yes
- Armendariz: yes
- Dover: yes
- Kauth: yes
- Sanders: yes
- Ballard: yes
- Dungan: yes
- Lippincott: yes
- Sorrentino: yes
- Bosn: yes
- Fredrickson: yes
- Lonowski: yes
- Spivey: yes
- Bostar: yes
- Guereca: yes
- McKeon: yes
- Storer: yes
- Brandt: yes
- Hallstrom: yes
- McKinney: yes
- Storm: yes
- Cavanaugh, J.: yes
- Hansen: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Strommen: yes
- Cavanaugh, M.: yes
- Hardin: yes
- Moser: yes
- von Gillern: yes
- Clements: yes
- Holdcroft: yes
- Murman: yes
- Wordekemper: yes
- Clouse: yes
- Hughes: yes
- Prokop: yes
- Conrad: yes
- Hunt: yes
- Quick: yes
- DeBoer: yes
- Ibach: yes
- Raybould: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:27:15.448898Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=NE&identifier=LB 641. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.