NE LB 302
deadEliminate daylight saving time
Nebraska · 2026 Regular Session (109th Legislature, 2nd Session) · legislature
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did NE LB 302 pass?
No. NE LB 302 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-04-17): Indefinitely postponed
What is NE LB 302 about?
NE LB 302 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session (109th Legislature, 2nd Session) titled “Eliminate daylight saving time”.
Who sponsors NE LB 302?
Murman is the primary sponsor of NE LB 302.
- Introduced
- 2025-01-15
- Latest action
- 2026-04-17 — Indefinitely postponed
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Murmanprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-17
Indefinitely postponed
committee-failure
2026-01-07
Title printed. Carryover bill
2025-03-17
Placed on Final Reading
reading-3
2025-03-11
Enrollment and Review ER18 adopted
2025-03-11
Advanced to Enrollment and Review for Engrossment
2025-02-26
Placed on Select File with ER18
filing
2025-02-26
Enrollment and Review ER18 filed
filing
2025-02-20
Advanced to Enrollment and Review Initial
2025-02-07
Placed on General File
committee-passage
2025-01-22
Notice of hearing for January 31, 2025
2025-01-17
Referred to Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee
referral-committee
2025-01-15
Date of introduction
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Advanced to Enrollment and Review Initial
2025-02-20 · pass · 28-9
Member-level votes (49)
- Andersen: yes
- DeKay: yes
- Lippincott: yes
- Riepe: yes
- Arch: yes
- Dungan: yes
- McKeon: yes
- Rountree: yes
- Armendariz: yes
- Hallstrom: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Sanders: yes
- Brandt: yes
- Hansen: yes
- Moser: yes
- Spivey: yes
- Cavanaugh, J.: yes
- Ibach: yes
- Murman: yes
- Storer: yes
- Conrad: yes
- Jacobson: yes
- Prokop: yes
- Storm: yes
- DeBoer: yes
- Kauth: yes
- Raybould: yes
- Wordekemper: yes
- Bosn: no
- Dover: no
- Juarez: no
- Clements: no
- Holdcroft: no
- Sorrentino: no
- Clouse: no
- Hunt: no
- Strommen: no
- Ballard: excused
- Hughes: excused
- McKinney: excused
- Dorn: excused
- Lonowski: excused
- Bostar: abstain
- Fredrickson: abstain
- Hardin: abstain
- von Gillern: abstain
- Cavanaugh, M.: abstain
- Guereca: abstain
- Quick: abstain
Advanced to Enrollment and Review for Engrossment
2025-03-11 · pass · 27-15
Member-level votes (49)
- Armendariz: yes
- Hansen: yes
- Lonowski: yes
- Sanders: yes
- Brandt: yes
- Hughes: yes
- McKeon: yes
- Spivey: yes
- Cavanaugh, J.: yes
- Ibach: yes
- Meyer: yes
- Storer: yes
- Clouse: yes
- Jacobson: yes
- Moser: yes
- Storm: yes
- Conrad: yes
- Juarez: yes
- Murman: yes
- Strommen: yes
- DeKay: yes
- Kauth: yes
- Raybould: yes
- Wordekemper: yes
- Dungan: yes
- Lippincott: yes
- Rountree: yes
- Andersen: no
- Clements: no
- Hallstrom: no
- Prokop: no
- Arch: no
- Dorn: no
- Holdcroft: no
- Sorrentino: no
- Bosn: no
- Dover: no
- Hunt: no
- von Gillern: no
- Cavanaugh, M.: no
- Guereca: no
- McKinney: no
- Ballard: abstain
- DeBoer: abstain
- Hardin: abstain
- Riepe: abstain
- Bostar: abstain
- Fredrickson: abstain
- Quick: abstain
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:27:15.448898Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=NE&identifier=LB 302. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.