NC HB 859
Status unknownLocal Governments/Guaranteed Income Programs.
North Carolina · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did NC HB 859 pass?
The current status of NC HB 859 is not known from the official record. Latest recorded action (2025-05-08): Special Message Sent To Senate
What is NC HB 859 about?
NC HB 859 is a bill in the 2025-2026 Regular Session titled “Local Governments/Guaranteed Income Programs.”.
- Introduced
- 2025-04-09
- Latest action
- 2025-05-08 — Special Message Sent To Senate
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Huneycuttcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-05-08
Special Message Sent To Senate
2025-05-08
Special Message Received From House
2025-05-08
Passed 1st Reading
reading-1
2025-05-08
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
referral-committee
2025-05-07
Reptd Fav
committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-07
Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
2025-05-07
Added to Calendar
2025-05-07
Passed 2nd Reading
reading-2
2025-05-07
Passed 3rd Reading
passage,reading-3
2025-05-06
Reptd Fav
committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-06
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
referral-committee
2025-04-29
Reptd Fav
committee-passage-favorable
2025-04-29
Re-ref Com On State and Local Government
referral-committee
2025-04-10
Passed 1st Reading
reading-1
2025-04-10
Ref to the Com on Commerce and Economic Development, if favorable, State and Local Government, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
referral-committee
2025-04-09
Filed
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Second Reading
2025-05-07 · pass · 69-40
Member-level votes (120)
- G. Pierce: yes
- R. Pierce: yes
- Willingham: yes
- Adams: yes
- Almond: yes
- Arp: yes
- Balkcom: yes
- Bell: yes
- Biggs: yes
- Blackwell: yes
- Blust: yes
- Branson: yes
- Brisson: yes
- Brody: yes
- Cairns: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Carver: yes
- Chesser: yes
- Cotham: yes
- Davis: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Echevarria: yes
- Eddins: yes
- Gable: yes
- Gillespie: yes
- Goodwin: yes
- Greene: yes
- D. Hall: yes
- K. Hall: yes
- Hastings: yes
- Howard: yes
- Humphrey: yes
- Iler: yes
- N. Jackson: yes
- Johnson: yes
- B. Jones: yes
- Kidwell: yes
- Lambeth: yes
- Loftis: yes
- Lowery: yes
- McNeely: yes
- Miller: yes
- Paré: yes
- Penny: yes
- Pickett: yes
- Pless: yes
- Potts: yes
- Pyrtle: yes
- Reeder: yes
- Rhyne: yes
- Riddell: yes
- Ross: yes
- Sauls: yes
- Schietzelt: yes
- Scott: yes
- Setzer: yes
- Shepard: yes
- CarsonSmith: yes
- Stevens: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Torbett: yes
- Ward: yes
- Warren: yes
- Watford: yes
- Wheatley: yes
- White: yes
- Willis: yes
- Winslow: yes
- Zenger: yes
- Ager: no
- Alston: no
- Ball: no
- Belk: no
- Brockman: no
- G. Brown: no
- K. Brown: no
- T. Brown: no
- Buansi: no
- Butler: no
- Carney: no
- Cervania: no
- Clark: no
- Cohn: no
- Colvin: no
- Crawford: no
- Cunningham: no
- Dahle: no
- Greenfield: no
- Harrison: no
- Hawkins: no
- Helfrich: no
- F. Jackson: no
- Johnson-Hostler: no
- A. Jones: no
- Liu: no
- Lofton: no
- Logan: no
- Longest: no
- Lopez: no
- Majeed: no
- Morey: no
- Pittman: no
- Price: no
- Reives: no
- Roberson: no
- Rubin: no
- CharlesSmith: no
- Turner: no
- vonHaefen: no
- Budd: abstain
- Jeffers: abstain
- Pike: abstain
- Tyson: abstain
- Baker: absent
- Dew: absent
- Prather: absent
- Quick: absent
- Clampitt: absent
- Huneycutt: absent
- Moss: absent
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:26:41.095757Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=NC&identifier=HB 859. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.