MI SR 100
passed one chamberA resolution to urge the federal government to issue clarifying rules or guidance explaining that claims applicable to state surprise billing laws must go through the state dispute resolution process, rather than the federal independent dispute resolution process.
Michigan · 2025-2026 Regular Session (103rd Legislature) · upper
- Introduced
- 2026-03-11
- Status date
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-03-17 — RULES SUSPENDED
- Bill type
- resolution
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Roger Hauckprimary
- Lana Theiscosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-03-11
INTRODUCED BY SENATOR ROGER HAUCK
introduction
2026-03-17
RULES SUSPENDED
2026-03-11
ADOPTED
passage
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- text/html(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- text/html
Votes
Not provided by source.
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:24:27.556085Z
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MI&identifier=SR 100. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.