MD SB 964
enactedPublic Works Contracts - Apprenticeship Requirements (Maryland Workforce Apprenticeship Utilization Act)
Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did MD SB 964 pass?
Yes. MD SB 964 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-05-12): Approved by the Governor - Chapter 409
What is MD SB 964 about?
MD SB 964 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Public Works Contracts - Apprenticeship Requirements (Maryland Workforce Apprenticeship Utilization Act)”.
Who sponsors MD SB 964?
McCray is the primary sponsor of MD SB 964.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-05-12 — Approved by the Governor - Chapter 409
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- McCrayprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-12
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 409
executive-signature
2026-04-13
Returned Passed
2026-04-13
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-04-13
Motion Special Order until Later This Session (Delegate Adams) Adopted
2026-04-13
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-13
Favorable Report by Government, Labor, and Elections
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-13
Rereferred to Government, Labor, and Elections
2026-04-13
Referred Rules and Executive Nominations
referral-committee
2026-04-13
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-04-10
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-04-10
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-10
Favorable with Amendments Report by Budget and Taxation
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-10
Rereferred to Budget and Taxation
2026-02-13
First Reading Senate Rules
referral-committee
Versions
- Chapter - Public Works Contracts - Apprenticeship Requirements (Maryland Workforce Apprenticeship Utilization Act)Compare
- Third - Public Works Contracts - Apprenticeship Requirements (Maryland Workforce Apprenticeship Utilization Act)Compare
- First - Public Works Contracts - Apprenticeship Requirements (Maryland Workforce Apprenticeship Utilization Act)Compare
- (document, no version)Compare
Documents
Votes
On Third Reading
2026-03-25 · pass · 45-0
Member-level votes (47)
- Mr. President: yes
- Corderman: yes
- Hester: yes
- Lewis Young: yes
- Simonaire: yes
- Attar: yes
- Feldman: yes
- Hettleman: yes
- Love: yes
- Smith: yes
- Augustine: yes
- Folden: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Mautz: yes
- Sydnor: yes
- Bailey: yes
- Gallion: yes
- James: yes
- McCray: yes
- Waldstreicher: yes
- Beidle: yes
- Gile: yes
- Jennings: yes
- McKay: yes
- Washington, A.: yes
- Benson: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Kagan: yes
- Muse: yes
- Washington, M.: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Harris: yes
- King: yes
- Ready: yes
- Watson: yes
- Carozza: yes
- Hayes: yes
- Kramer: yes
- Rosapepe: yes
- West: yes
- Charles: yes
- Henson: yes
- Lam: yes
- Salling: yes
- Zucker: yes
- Ellis: not voting
- Hershey: not voting
On Third Reading
2026-04-02 · pass · 124-11
Member-level votes (141)
- Speaker: yes
- Crosby: yes
- Ivey: yes
- Odom: yes
- Spiegel: yes
- Acevero: yes
- Crutchfield: yes
- Jacobs: yes
- Palakovich Carr: yes
- Stein: yes
- Adams: yes
- Cullison: yes
- Johnson, A.: yes
- Pasteur: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Addison: yes
- Davis: yes
- Johnson, S.: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Stinnett: yes
- Allen: yes
- Ebersole: yes
- Jones, D.: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Taveras: yes
- Alston: yes
- Edelson: yes
- Kaiser: yes
- Pippy: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Amprey: yes
- Embry: yes
- Kaufman: yes
- Pruski: yes
- Terrasa: yes
- Anderson: yes
- Fair: yes
- Kerr: yes
- Qi: yes
- Toles: yes
- Arentz: yes
- Feldmark: yes
- Kipke: yes
- Queen: yes
- Tomlinson: yes
- Bagnall: yes
- Fennell: yes
- Korman: yes
- Reilly: yes
- Turner: yes
- Barnes: yes
- Foley: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Roberson: yes
- Valderrama: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Forbes: yes
- Lewis: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Vogel: yes
- Beauchamp: yes
- Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
- Long, J.: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Watson: yes
- Behler: yes
- Griffith: yes
- Long, R.: yes
- Rose: yes
- Wells: yes
- Bhandari: yes
- Guyton: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Rosenberg: yes
- White Holland: yes
- Boafo: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Ross: yes
- Wilkins: yes
- Boyce: yes
- Harrison: yes
- McCaskill: yes
- Ruff: yes
- Williams: yes
- Buckel: yes
- Hartman: yes
- McComas: yes
- Ruth: yes
- Wims: yes
- Cardin: yes
- Healey: yes
- Metzgar: yes
- Schindler: yes
- Wolek: yes
- Chang: yes
- Hill: yes
- Miller: yes
- Schmidt: yes
- Woods: yes
- Charkoudian: yes
- Hinebaugh: yes
- Mireku-North: yes
- Shetty: yes
- Woorman: yes
- Ciliberti: yes
- Holmes: yes
- Moon: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Wu: yes
- Clippinger: yes
- Hornberger: yes
- Moreno: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Young: yes
- Coley: yes
- Howard: yes
- Morgan, T.: yes
- Smith: yes
- Ziegler: yes
- Conaway: yes
- Hutchinson: yes
- Nkongolo: yes
- Solomon: yes
- Arikan: no
- Fisher: no
- Mangione: no
- Nawrocki: no
- Valentine: no
- Baker: no
- Grammer: no
- Morgan, M.: no
- Szeliga: no
- Wivell: no
- Chisholm: no
- Bouchat: not voting
- Ghrist: not voting
- Sample-Hughes: not voting
- Stonko: not voting
- Wilson: not voting
- Jones, A.: absent
Related bills
- Prior session: SB 688not in this corpus
- Companion bill: HB 864
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=SB 964. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.