MD SB 589
died on adjournmentBusiness Regulation - Collection Agencies and Property Managers
Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did MD SB 589 pass?
No. MD SB 589 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-24): Hearing 4/01 at 1:00 p.m.
What is MD SB 589 about?
MD SB 589 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Business Regulation - Collection Agencies and Property Managers”.
Who sponsors MD SB 589?
Kramer is the primary sponsor of MD SB 589.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-03-24 — Hearing 4/01 at 1:00 p.m.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Kramerprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-24
Hearing 4/01 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-03-20
Referred Economic Matters
referral-committee
2026-03-19
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-17
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-03-17
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-16
Favorable with Amendments Report by Finance
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-11
Hearing 2/26 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-02-05
First Reading Finance
referral-committee
Versions
Documents
Votes
On Third Reading
2026-03-03 · pass · 43-2
Member-level votes (47)
- Mr. President: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Hershey: yes
- Lewis Young: yes
- Simonaire: yes
- Attar: yes
- Feldman: yes
- Hester: yes
- Love: yes
- Smith: yes
- Augustine: yes
- Folden: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Mautz: yes
- Waldstreicher: yes
- Bailey: yes
- Gallion: yes
- James: yes
- McCray: yes
- Washington, A.: yes
- Beidle: yes
- Gile: yes
- Jennings: yes
- McKay: yes
- Washington, M.: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Kagan: yes
- Ready: yes
- Watson: yes
- Carozza: yes
- Harris: yes
- King: yes
- Rosapepe: yes
- West: yes
- Charles: yes
- Hayes: yes
- Kramer: yes
- Salling: yes
- Zucker: yes
- Corderman: yes
- Henson: yes
- Lam: yes
- Hettleman: no
- Sydnor: no
- Benson: absent
- Muse: absent
Related bills
- Companion bill: HB 433
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=SB 589. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.