MD SB 491
enactedLaw Enforcement Officers' Pension System - Military Service Credit Eligibility - Helicopter Pilots
Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did MD SB 491 pass?
Yes. MD SB 491 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-04-28): Approved by the Governor - Chapter 297
What is MD SB 491 about?
MD SB 491 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Law Enforcement Officers' Pension System - Military Service Credit Eligibility - Helicopter Pilots”.
Who sponsors MD SB 491?
Salling is the primary sponsor of MD SB 491.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-04-28 — Approved by the Governor - Chapter 297
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Sallingprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-28
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 297
executive-signature
2026-04-10
Returned Passed
2026-04-10
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-04-08
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-08
Favorable Report by Appropriations
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-07
Hearing 4/07 at 1:30 p.m.
2026-04-07
Hearing canceled
2026-04-07
Hearing 4/07 at 1:15 p.m.
2026-04-07
Hearing canceled
2026-03-26
Hearing 4/07 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-03-21
Referred Appropriations
referral-committee
2026-03-20
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-19
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-03-19
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-19
Favorable with Amendments Report by Budget and Taxation
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-11
Hearing 2/19 at 9:00 a.m.
2026-02-02
First Reading Budget and Taxation
referral-committee
Versions
- Chapter - Law Enforcement Officers' Pension System - Military Service Credit Eligibility - Helicopter PilotsCompare
- Third - Law Enforcement Officers' Pension System - Military Service Credit Eligibility - Helicopter PilotsCompare
- First - Law Enforcement Officers' Pension System - Military Service Credit EligibilityCompare
- (document, no version)Compare
Documents
Votes
On Third Reading
2026-03-05 · pass · 42-0
Member-level votes (47)
- Mr. President: yes
- Gallion: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Love: yes
- Smith: yes
- Augustine: yes
- Gile: yes
- James: yes
- Mautz: yes
- Sydnor: yes
- Bailey: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Jennings: yes
- McCray: yes
- Waldstreicher: yes
- Beidle: yes
- Harris: yes
- Kagan: yes
- McKay: yes
- Washington, A.: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Hayes: yes
- King: yes
- Muse: yes
- Washington, M.: yes
- Carozza: yes
- Henson: yes
- Kramer: yes
- Ready: yes
- Watson: yes
- Charles: yes
- Hershey: yes
- Lam: yes
- Rosapepe: yes
- West: yes
- Corderman: yes
- Hester: yes
- Lewis Young: yes
- Salling: yes
- Zucker: yes
- Feldman: yes
- Hettleman: yes
- Ellis: not voting
- Attar: absent
- Benson: absent
- Folden: absent
- Simonaire: absent
On Third Reading
2026-03-25 · pass · 133-0
Member-level votes (141)
- Speaker: yes
- Conaway: yes
- Ivey: yes
- Nkongolo: yes
- Spiegel: yes
- Acevero: yes
- Crosby: yes
- Jacobs: yes
- Odom: yes
- Stein: yes
- Adams: yes
- Crutchfield: yes
- Johnson, A.: yes
- Palakovich Carr: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Addison: yes
- Cullison: yes
- Johnson, S.: yes
- Pasteur: yes
- Stinnett: yes
- Allen: yes
- Davis: yes
- Jones, D.: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Stonko: yes
- Alston: yes
- Ebersole: yes
- Kaiser: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Szeliga: yes
- Amprey: yes
- Edelson: yes
- Kaufman: yes
- Pippy: yes
- Taveras: yes
- Anderson: yes
- Embry: yes
- Kerr: yes
- Pruski: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Arentz: yes
- Fair: yes
- Kipke: yes
- Qi: yes
- Terrasa: yes
- Arikan: yes
- Feldmark: yes
- Korman: yes
- Reilly: yes
- Toles: yes
- Bagnall: yes
- Fennell: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Roberson: yes
- Tomlinson: yes
- Baker: yes
- Foley: yes
- Lewis: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Turner: yes
- Barnes: yes
- Forbes: yes
- Long, J.: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Valderrama: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
- Long, R.: yes
- Rose: yes
- Valentine: yes
- Beauchamp: yes
- Ghrist: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Rosenberg: yes
- Vogel: yes
- Behler: yes
- Grammer: yes
- Mangione: yes
- Ross: yes
- Watson: yes
- Bhandari: yes
- Guyton: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Ruff: yes
- Wells: yes
- Boafo: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- McCaskill: yes
- Ruth: yes
- White Holland: yes
- Boyce: yes
- Harrison: yes
- McComas: yes
- Sample-Hughes: yes
- Wilkins: yes
- Buckel: yes
- Hartman: yes
- Metzgar: yes
- Schindler: yes
- Wims: yes
- Cardin: yes
- Healey: yes
- Miller: yes
- Schmidt: yes
- Wivell: yes
- Chang: yes
- Hill: yes
- Mireku-North: yes
- Shetty: yes
- Wolek: yes
- Charkoudian: yes
- Hinebaugh: yes
- Moon: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Woods: yes
- Chisholm: yes
- Holmes: yes
- Moreno: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Woorman: yes
- Ciliberti: yes
- Hornberger: yes
- Morgan, M.: yes
- Smith: yes
- Wu: yes
- Clippinger: yes
- Howard: yes
- Morgan, T.: yes
- Solomon: yes
- Ziegler: yes
- Coley: yes
- Hutchinson: yes
- Nawrocki: yes
- Bouchat: not voting
- Fisher: not voting
- Griffith: not voting
- Jones, A.: absent
- Queen: absent
- Williams: absent
- Wilson: absent
- Young: absent
Related bills
- Companion bill: HB 789
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=SB 491. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.