MD SB 28

enacted

Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026

Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did MD SB 28 pass?

Yes. MD SB 28 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-04-28): Approved by the Governor, assigned a chapter number, enactment subject to constitutional referendum - Chapter 156

What is MD SB 28 about?

MD SB 28 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026”.

Who sponsors MD SB 28?

Zucker, Rosapepe, Lewis Young and 5 others are the primary sponsors of MD SB 28.

Introduced: 2025-09-24
Latest action: 2026-04-28 — Approved by the Governor, assigned a chapter number, enactment subject to constitutional referendum - Chapter 156
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

2026-04-28
Approved by the Governor, assigned a chapter number, enactment subject to constitutional referendum - Chapter 156
executive-signature
2026-04-10
Returned Passed
2026-04-10
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-04-08
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-08
Favorable Report by Government, Labor, and Elections
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-26
Hearing 4/02 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-03-20
Referred Government, Labor, and Elections
referral-committee
2026-03-19
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-18
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-03-18
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-18
Favorable with Amendments Report by Budget and Taxation
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-05
Hearing 2/18 at 1:00 p.m. (Budget and Taxation)
2026-01-14
First Reading Budget and Taxation and Finance
referral-committee
2025-09-24
Pre-filed
introduction

Versions

Chapter - Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026Compare
Third - Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026Compare
First - Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026Compare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

On Third Reading (Const)
2026-03-03 · pass · 34-11
Member-level votes (47)
- Mr. President: yes
- Feldman: yes
- Hettleman: yes
- Lewis Young: yes
- Sydnor: yes
- Attar: yes
- Gile: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Love: yes
- Waldstreicher: yes
- Augustine: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- James: yes
- McCray: yes
- Washington, A.: yes
- Beidle: yes
- Harris: yes
- Kagan: yes
- McKay: yes
- Washington, M.: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Hayes: yes
- King: yes
- Rosapepe: yes
- Watson: yes
- Charles: yes
- Henson: yes
- Kramer: yes
- Salling: yes
- Zucker: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Hester: yes
- Lam: yes
- Smith: yes
- Bailey: no
- Folden: no
- Hershey: no
- Mautz: no
- Simonaire: no
- Carozza: no
- Gallion: no
- Jennings: no
- Ready: no
- West: no
- Corderman: no
- Benson: absent
- Muse: absent
On Third Reading (Const)
2026-03-26 · pass · 99-34
Member-level votes (141)
- Speaker: yes
- Davis: yes
- Johnson, S.: yes
- Qi: yes
- Taveras: yes
- Acevero: yes
- Ebersole: yes
- Jones, D.: yes
- Queen: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Addison: yes
- Edelson: yes
- Kaiser: yes
- Roberson: yes
- Terrasa: yes
- Allen: yes
- Embry: yes
- Kaufman: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Toles: yes
- Amprey: yes
- Fair: yes
- Korman: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Turner: yes
- Bagnall: yes
- Feldmark: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Rosenberg: yes
- Valderrama: yes
- Barnes: yes
- Fennell: yes
- Lewis: yes
- Ross: yes
- Vogel: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Foley: yes
- Long, J.: yes
- Ruff: yes
- Watson: yes
- Behler: yes
- Forbes: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Ruth: yes
- Wells: yes
- Bhandari: yes
- Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Sample-Hughes: yes
- White Holland: yes
- Boyce: yes
- Ghrist: yes
- McCaskill: yes
- Schindler: yes
- Wilkins: yes
- Cardin: yes
- Guyton: yes
- Mireku-North: yes
- Shetty: yes
- Williams: yes
- Chang: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Moon: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Charkoudian: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Moreno: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Wims: yes
- Clippinger: yes
- Healey: yes
- Odom: yes
- Smith: yes
- Wolek: yes
- Coley: yes
- Hill: yes
- Palakovich Carr: yes
- Solomon: yes
- Woods: yes
- Conaway: yes
- Holmes: yes
- Pasteur: yes
- Spiegel: yes
- Woorman: yes
- Crosby: yes
- Hornberger: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Stein: yes
- Wu: yes
- Crutchfield: yes
- Ivey: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Ziegler: yes
- Cullison: yes
- Johnson, A.: yes
- Pruski: yes
- Stinnett: yes
- Adams: no
- Fisher: no
- Jacobs: no
- Morgan, M.: no
- Schmidt: no
- Arentz: no
- Grammer: no
- Kipke: no
- Morgan, T.: no
- Stonko: no
- Arikan: no
- Griffith: no
- Long, R.: no
- Nawrocki: no
- Szeliga: no
- Baker: no
- Hartman: no
- Mangione: no
- Nkongolo: no
- Tomlinson: no
- Beauchamp: no
- Hinebaugh: no
- McComas: no
- Pippy: no
- Valentine: no
- Buckel: no
- Howard: no
- Metzgar: no
- Reilly: no
- Wivell: no
- Chisholm: no
- Hutchinson: no
- Miller: no
- Rose: no
- Alston: not voting
- Anderson: not voting
- Boafo: not voting
- Bouchat: not voting
- Kerr: not voting
- Ciliberti: absent
- Jones, A.: absent
- Young: absent

Related bills

Prior session: SB 288not in this corpus
Companion bill: HB 604

Official source

http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/sb0028?ys=2026RS

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this session Session dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=SB 28. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.