Bill Commons

MD HB 569

enacted

Queen Anne's County - Authorized Uses of Revenues From Development Impact Fees - Expansion

Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did MD HB 569 pass?

Yes. MD HB 569 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-05-12): Approved by the Governor - Chapter 585

What is MD HB 569 about?

MD HB 569 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Queen Anne's County - Authorized Uses of Revenues From Development Impact Fees - Expansion”.

Who sponsors MD HB 569?

Jacobs, Ghrist, Arentz are the primary sponsors of MD HB 569.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-05-12 — Approved by the Governor - Chapter 585
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Sponsors

  • Jacobsprimary
  • Ghristprimary
  • Arentzprimary

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-12

    Approved by the Governor - Chapter 585

    executive-signature

  2. 2026-04-08

    Returned Passed

  3. 2026-04-08

    Third Reading Passed

    passage

  4. 2026-04-01

    Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed

    committee-passage-favorable

  5. 2026-04-01

    Favorable Report by Budget and Taxation

    committee-passage-favorable

  6. 2026-03-20

    Referred Budget and Taxation

    referral-committee

  7. 2026-03-19

    Third Reading Passed

    passage

  8. 2026-03-19

    Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed

    committee-passage-favorable

  9. 2026-03-19

    Favorable Report by Ways and Means

    committee-passage-favorable

  10. 2026-01-29

    Hearing 2/10 at 1:00 p.m.

  11. 2026-01-28

    First Reading Ways and Means

    referral-committee

Versions

  • Chapter - Queen Anne's County - Authorized Uses of Revenues From Development Impact Fees - ExpansionCompare
  • Third - Queen Anne's County - Authorized Uses of Revenues From Development Impact Fees - ExpansionCompare
  • First - Queen Anne's County - Authorized Uses of Revenues From Development Impact Fees - ExpansionCompare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • On Third Reading

    2026-03-07 · pass · 131-0

    Member-level votes (141)
    • Speaker: yes
    • Crutchfield: yes
    • Ivey: yes
    • Odom: yes
    • Stein: yes
    • Acevero: yes
    • Cullison: yes
    • Jacobs: yes
    • Palakovich Carr: yes
    • Stewart: yes
    • Adams: yes
    • Davis: yes
    • Johnson, A.: yes
    • Pasteur: yes
    • Stinnett: yes
    • Addison: yes
    • Ebersole: yes
    • Jones, D.: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Stonko: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Embry: yes
    • Kaiser: yes
    • Phillips: yes
    • Szeliga: yes
    • Alston: yes
    • Fair: yes
    • Kaufman: yes
    • Pippy: yes
    • Taveras: yes
    • Amprey: yes
    • Feldmark: yes
    • Kerr: yes
    • Pruski: yes
    • Taylor: yes
    • Anderson: yes
    • Fennell: yes
    • Kipke: yes
    • Qi: yes
    • Terrasa: yes
    • Arentz: yes
    • Fisher: yes
    • Korman: yes
    • Queen: yes
    • Toles: yes
    • Arikan: yes
    • Foley: yes
    • Lehman: yes
    • Reilly: yes
    • Tomlinson: yes
    • Bagnall: yes
    • Forbes: yes
    • Lewis: yes
    • Roberson: yes
    • Turner: yes
    • Baker: yes
    • Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
    • Long, J.: yes
    • Roberts: yes
    • Valderrama: yes
    • Barnes: yes
    • Ghrist: yes
    • Lopez: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Valentine: yes
    • Bartlett: yes
    • Grammer: yes
    • Mangione: yes
    • Rose: yes
    • Watson: yes
    • Beauchamp: yes
    • Griffith: yes
    • Martinez: yes
    • Rosenberg: yes
    • Wells: yes
    • Behler: yes
    • Guyton: yes
    • McCaskill: yes
    • Ross: yes
    • White Holland: yes
    • Bhandari: yes
    • Guzzone: yes
    • McComas: yes
    • Ruff: yes
    • Wilkins: yes
    • Boyce: yes
    • Harrison: yes
    • Metzgar: yes
    • Ruth: yes
    • Williams: yes
    • Buckel: yes
    • Hartman: yes
    • Miller: yes
    • Schindler: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Cardin: yes
    • Healey: yes
    • Mireku-North: yes
    • Schmidt: yes
    • Wims: yes
    • Chang: yes
    • Hill: yes
    • Moon: yes
    • Shetty: yes
    • Wivell: yes
    • Charkoudian: yes
    • Hinebaugh: yes
    • Moreno: yes
    • Simmons: yes
    • Wolek: yes
    • Chisholm: yes
    • Holmes: yes
    • Morgan, M.: yes
    • Simpson: yes
    • Woods: yes
    • Ciliberti: yes
    • Hornberger: yes
    • Morgan, T.: yes
    • Smith: yes
    • Woorman: yes
    • Clippinger: yes
    • Howard: yes
    • Nawrocki: yes
    • Solomon: yes
    • Wu: yes
    • Coley: yes
    • Hutchinson: yes
    • Nkongolo: yes
    • Spiegel: yes
    • Ziegler: yes
    • Conaway: yes
    • Boafo: not voting
    • Crosby: not voting
    • Edelson: not voting
    • Vogel: not voting
    • Young: not voting
    • Bouchat: not voting
    • Johnson, S.: absent
    • Jones, A.: absent
    • Long, R.: absent
    • Sample-Hughes: absent

Related bills

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=HB 569. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.