MD HB 421
died on adjournmentPrince George's County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Maryland Route 210 PG 309-26
Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did MD HB 421 pass?
No. MD HB 421 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-04-13): Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
What is MD HB 421 about?
MD HB 421 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Prince George's County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Maryland Route 210 PG 309-26”.
Who sponsors MD HB 421?
Prince George's County Delegation is the primary sponsor of MD HB 421.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-04-13 — Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Prince George's County Delegationprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2026-01-22
First Reading Environment and Transportation
referral-committee
2026-03-02
Hearing 3/12 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-03-21
Favorable with Amendments Report by Environment and Transportation
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-21
Favorable with Amendments {
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-21
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
2026-03-23
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-23
Referred Judicial Proceedings
referral-committee
2026-04-13
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
committee-passage-favorable
Versions
Documents
Votes
On Third Reading
2026-03-11 · pass · 96-35
Member-level votes (141)
- Speaker: yes
- Ebersole: yes
- Kaufman: yes
- Queen: yes
- Taveras: yes
- Acevero: yes
- Edelson: yes
- Kerr: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Addison: yes
- Embry: yes
- Korman: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Terrasa: yes
- Allen: yes
- Fair: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Rosenberg: yes
- Toles: yes
- Alston: yes
- Feldmark: yes
- Lewis: yes
- Ross: yes
- Turner: yes
- Amprey: yes
- Fennell: yes
- Long, J.: yes
- Ruff: yes
- Valderrama: yes
- Arentz: yes
- Foley: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Ruth: yes
- Vogel: yes
- Bagnall: yes
- Forbes: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Sample-Hughes: yes
- Watson: yes
- Barnes: yes
- Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
- McCaskill: yes
- Schindler: yes
- Wells: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Guyton: yes
- Mireku-North: yes
- Schmidt: yes
- White Holland: yes
- Behler: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Moon: yes
- Shetty: yes
- Wilkins: yes
- Bhandari: yes
- Healey: yes
- Moreno: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Williams: yes
- Boyce: yes
- Hill: yes
- Morgan, T.: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Wims: yes
- Chang: yes
- Holmes: yes
- Odom: yes
- Smith: yes
- Wolek: yes
- Charkoudian: yes
- Hornberger: yes
- Palakovich Carr: yes
- Solomon: yes
- Woods: yes
- Clippinger: yes
- Johnson, A.: yes
- Pasteur: yes
- Spiegel: yes
- Woorman: yes
- Coley: yes
- Johnson, S.: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Stein: yes
- Wu: yes
- Conaway: yes
- Jones, D.: yes
- Pruski: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Young: yes
- Crutchfield: yes
- Kaiser: yes
- Qi: yes
- Stinnett: yes
- Ziegler: yes
- Cullison: yes
- Adams: no
- Ciliberti: no
- Hinebaugh: no
- Metzgar: no
- Rose: no
- Anderson: no
- Davis: no
- Howard: no
- Miller: no
- Stonko: no
- Arikan: no
- Fisher: no
- Hutchinson: no
- Morgan, M.: no
- Szeliga: no
- Baker: no
- Ghrist: no
- Jacobs: no
- Nkongolo: no
- Tomlinson: no
- Beauchamp: no
- Grammer: no
- Kipke: no
- Patterson: no
- Valentine: no
- Buckel: no
- Griffith: no
- Long, R.: no
- Pippy: no
- Wilson: no
- Chisholm: no
- Hartman: no
- McComas: no
- Reilly: no
- Wivell: no
- Boafo: not voting
- Cardin: not voting
- Harrison: not voting
- Mangione: not voting
- Roberson: not voting
- Bouchat: not voting
- Crosby: not voting
- Ivey: not voting
- Nawrocki: not voting
- Jones, A.: absent
Related bills
- Companion bill: SB 152
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=HB 421. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.