IN SB 6
enactedExtension of water or wastewater mains.
Indiana · 2026 Regular Session (2nd Regular Session, 124th General Assembly) · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did IN SB 6 pass?
Yes. IN SB 6 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-03-04): Public Law 65
What is IN SB 6 about?
Provides that before a municipally owned utility (utility) may condemn land for the extension of a water main or a wastewater main that is located outside: (1) the corporate boundaries of the municipality; or (2) the existing service territory of the utility; the utility must provide, by mail, written notice to each landowner whose land is needed for the extension and to the county plan commission for the county in which the extension project is proposed. Sets forth the information that must be included in the required notices. Requires the: (1) utility to post on the utility's website; and (2) county in which the extension project is proposed to post on the county's website; certain information about the proposed extension project. Provides that a landowner or a county plan commission that receives a notice from a utility under the bill's provisions may, not later than 30 days after receiving the notice, request in writing a meeting with the utility regarding the proposed extension project. Provides that upon receiving such a request, the utility shall offer to meet with the landowner or county plan commission not later than 30 days after the utility's receipt of the request. Authorizes a utility to proceed with a proposed extension project if the utility has satisfied the bill's notice requirements. Beginning in 2027, requires the Indiana utility regulatory commission (IURC) to include in its annual report the following information with respect to the most recently concluded state fiscal year: (1) Any reported delays in an extension project that a utility attributes to any of the bill's requirements. (2) Any complaints or disputes arising under the bill's provisions that are submitted to the IURC. (3) Any action taken by the IURC with respect to any reported delays, complaints, or disputes arising under the bill's provisions.
Who sponsors IN SB 6?
Daryl Schmitt, Dan Dernulc, Rick Niemeyer and 1 others are the primary sponsors of IN SB 6, joined by 3 cosponsors.
Description
Provides that before a municipally owned utility (utility) may condemn land for the extension of a water main or a wastewater main that is located outside: (1) the corporate boundaries of the municipality; or (2) the existing service territory of the utility; the utility must provide, by mail, written notice to each landowner whose land is needed for the extension and to the county plan commission for the county in which the extension project is proposed. Sets forth the information that must be included in the required notices. Requires the: (1) utility to post on the utility's website; and (2) county in which the extension project is proposed to post on the county's website; certain information about the proposed extension project. Provides that a landowner or a county plan commission that receives a notice from a utility under the bill's provisions may, not later than 30 days after receiving the notice, request in writing a meeting with the utility regarding the proposed extension project. Provides that upon receiving such a request, the utility shall offer to meet with the landowner or county plan commission not later than 30 days after the utility's receipt of the request. Authorizes a utility to proceed with a proposed extension project if the utility has satisfied the bill's notice requirements. Beginning in 2027, requires the Indiana utility regulatory commission (IURC) to include in its annual report the following information with respect to the most recently concluded state fiscal year: (1) Any reported delays in an extension project that a utility attributes to any of the bill's requirements. (2) Any complaints or disputes arising under the bill's provisions that are submitted to the IURC. (3) Any action taken by the IURC with respect to any reported delays, complaints, or disputes arising under the bill's provisions.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-03-04 — Public Law 65
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Daryl Schmittauthor
- Dan Dernulcauthor
- Rick Niemeyerauthor
- Harold Slagersponsor
- J.D. Fordcoauthor
- Julie Olthoffcosponsor
- Mike Aylesworthcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-04
Public Law 65
became-law
2026-03-04
Signed by the Governor
executive-signature
2026-02-27
Signed by the President of the Senate
passage
2026-02-26
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
passage
2026-02-26
Signed by the Speaker
passage
2026-02-25
Senate concurred with House amendments; Roll Call 268: yeas 45, nays 0
2026-02-24
Returned to the Senate with amendments
receipt
2026-02-24
Motion to concur filed
filing
2026-02-23
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 303: yeas 91, nays 2
passage,reading-3,reading-3
2026-02-19
Second reading: ordered engrossed
reading-2
2026-02-17
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
committee-passage
2026-01-20
First reading: referred to Committee on Utilities, Energy and Telecommunications
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-01-14
Referred to the House
referral
2026-01-13
Senator Schmitt added as third author
2026-01-13
House sponsor: Representative Slager
2026-01-13
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 24: yeas 49, nays 0
passage,reading-3,reading-3
2026-01-13
Cosponsors: Representatives Olthoff, Aylesworth
2026-01-12
Amendment #1 (Niemeyer) prevailed; voice vote
amendment-passage
2026-01-12
Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed
reading-2
2026-01-08
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
committee-passage
2026-01-08
Senator Dernulc added as second author
2026-01-06
Senator Ford J.D. added as coauthor
2025-12-08
First reading: referred to Committee on Local Government
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-12-08
Authored by Senator Niemeyer
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
SB 6 - Niemeyer - 3rd Reading
2026-01-13 · pass · 49-0
Member-level votes (49)
- Alexander: yes
- Charbonneau: yes
- Holdman: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Alting: yes
- Clark: yes
- Hunley: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Baldwin: yes
- Crider: yes
- Jackson, L: yes
- Schmitt: yes
- Bassler: yes
- Deery: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Spencer: yes
- Becker: yes
- Dernulc: yes
- Koch: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Bohacek: yes
- Donato: yes
- Leising: yes
- Tomes: yes
- Bray: yes
- Doriot: yes
- Maxwell: yes
- Walker G: yes
- Brown: yes
- Ford J.D.: yes
- Mishler: yes
- Walker K: yes
- Buchanan: yes
- Freeman: yes
- Niemeyer: yes
- Yoder: yes
- Buck: yes
- Garten: yes
- Niezgodski: yes
- Young: yes
- Busch: yes
- Gaskill: yes
- Pol: yes
- Byrne: yes
- Glick: yes
- Qaddoura: yes
- Carrasco: yes
- Goode: yes
- Raatz: yes
SB 6 - Slager - 3rd Reading
2026-02-23 · pass · 91-2
Member-level votes (100)
- Abbott: yes
- Engleman: yes
- Klinker: yes
- Pierce, M: yes
- Andrade: yes
- Errington: yes
- Lauer: yes
- Porter: yes
- Aylesworth: yes
- Genda: yes
- Lawson: yes
- Prescott: yes
- Baird: yes
- GiaQuinta: yes
- Ledbetter: yes
- Pressel: yes
- Barrett: yes
- Gore: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Pryor: yes
- Bartels: yes
- Goss-Reaves: yes
- Lindauer: yes
- Rowray: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Greene: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Shackleford: yes
- Bascom: yes
- Haggard: yes
- Lucas: yes
- Shonkwiler: yes
- Bauer: yes
- Hall: yes
- Manning: yes
- Slager: yes
- Borders: yes
- Hamilton: yes
- May: yes
- Smaltz: yes
- Burton: yes
- Harris: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Smith, H: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Hatcher: yes
- McNamara: yes
- Smith, V: yes
- Carbaugh: yes
- Heaton: yes
- Miller, D: yes
- Snow: yes
- Cash: yes
- Heine: yes
- Miller, K: yes
- Soliday: yes
- Clere: yes
- Hostettler: yes
- Morris: yes
- Steuerwald: yes
- Commons: yes
- Ireland: yes
- Novak: yes
- Summers: yes
- Criswell: yes
- Isa: yes
- O'Brien: yes
- Sweet: yes
- Culp: yes
- Jackson, C: yes
- Olthoff: yes
- Teshka: yes
- Dant Chesser: yes
- Jeter: yes
- Pack: yes
- Thompson: yes
- Davis: yes
- Johnson, B: yes
- Patterson: yes
- VanNatter: yes
- DeLaney: yes
- Jordan: yes
- Payne: yes
- Wesco: yes
- DeVon: yes
- Judy: yes
- Pfaff: yes
- Yocum: yes
- Dvorak: yes
- King: yes
- Pierce, K: yes
- Meltzer: no
- Zimmerman: no
- Behning: excused
- Moed: excused
- Moseley: excused
- Garcia Wilburn: not voting
- Karickhoff: not voting
- McGuire: not voting
- Mr. Speaker: not voting
SB 6 - Niemeyer
2026-02-25 · pass · 45-0
Member-level votes (50)
- Alexander: yes
- Carrasco: yes
- Jackson, L: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Alting: yes
- Charbonneau: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Schmitt: yes
- Baldwin: yes
- Clark: yes
- Koch: yes
- Spencer: yes
- Bassler: yes
- Crider: yes
- Leising: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Becker: yes
- Ford J.D.: yes
- Maxwell: yes
- Tomes: yes
- Bohacek: yes
- Freeman: yes
- McKinley: yes
- Walker G: yes
- Bray: yes
- Garten: yes
- Mishler: yes
- Walker K: yes
- Brown: yes
- Gaskill: yes
- Niemeyer: yes
- Yoder: yes
- Buchanan: yes
- Glick: yes
- Niezgodski: yes
- Young: yes
- Buck: yes
- Goode: yes
- Qaddoura: yes
- Busch: yes
- Holdman: yes
- Raatz: yes
- Byrne: yes
- Hunley: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Pol: excused
- Deery: not voting
- Dernulc: not voting
- Donato: not voting
- Doriot: not voting
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:22:09.317128Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=IN&identifier=SB 6. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.