IN SB 172
died on adjournmentAdministrative rulemaking.
Indiana · 2026 Regular Session (2nd Regular Session, 124th General Assembly) · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did IN SB 172 pass?
No. IN SB 172 died when the 2026 Regular Session (2nd Regular Session, 124th General Assembly) adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): Reassigned to Committee on Ways and Means
What is IN SB 172 about?
Provides that if the implementation and compliance costs of a proposed rule, provisional rule, or interim rule exceed $100,000 (instead of $1,000,000) over a two year period: (1) the rule cannot be published in the Indiana Register until the budget committee has reviewed the rule; (2) the budget agency and the office of management and budget may not approve any part of the proposed rule prior to review by the budget committee; and (3) in the case of a provisional rule or an interim rule, the governor may not approve a rule prior to the budget committee's review of the rule. Provides that an agency may adopt a rule only if the agency has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the governor that certain circumstances exist. Specifies that provisional and interim rulemaking may be used only under specified circumstances if the combined implementation and compliance costs would not exceed $500,000 for businesses, units, and individuals if effective over a two year period.
Who sponsors IN SB 172?
Doug Miller, Liz Brown, Chris Garten and 1 others are the primary sponsors of IN SB 172, joined by 4 cosponsors.
Description
Provides that if the implementation and compliance costs of a proposed rule, provisional rule, or interim rule exceed $100,000 (instead of $1,000,000) over a two year period: (1) the rule cannot be published in the Indiana Register until the budget committee has reviewed the rule; (2) the budget agency and the office of management and budget may not approve any part of the proposed rule prior to review by the budget committee; and (3) in the case of a provisional rule or an interim rule, the governor may not approve a rule prior to the budget committee's review of the rule. Provides that an agency may adopt a rule only if the agency has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the governor that certain circumstances exist. Specifies that provisional and interim rulemaking may be used only under specified circumstances if the combined implementation and compliance costs would not exceed $500,000 for businesses, units, and individuals if effective over a two year period.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-02-02 — Reassigned to Committee on Ways and Means
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Doug Millersponsor
- Liz Brownauthor
- Chris Gartenauthor
- Tyler Johnsonauthor
- Aaron Freemancoauthor
- Eric Kochcoauthor
- Ed Charbonneaucoauthor
- Garrett Bascomcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-02-02
Reassigned to Committee on Ways and Means
referral-committee
2026-01-29
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-01-28
Referred to the House
referral
2026-01-27
Senator Koch added as coauthor
2026-01-27
Cosponsor: Representative Bascom
2026-01-27
House sponsor: Representative Miller D
2026-01-27
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 98: yeas 46, nays 0
passage,reading-3,reading-3
2026-01-27
Senators Freeman, Charbonneau added as coauthors
2026-01-26
Second reading: ordered engrossed
reading-2
2026-01-22
Senator Garten added as second author
2026-01-22
Senator Brown L added as third author
2026-01-22
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
committee-passage
2026-01-05
First reading: referred to Committee on Appropriations
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-01-05
Authored by Senator Johnson T
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
SB 172 - Johnson T - 3rd Reading
2026-01-27 · pass · 46-0
Member-level votes (49)
- Alexander: yes
- Charbonneau: yes
- Hunley: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Alting: yes
- Clark: yes
- Jackson, L: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Baldwin: yes
- Crider: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Schmitt: yes
- Bassler: yes
- Deery: yes
- Koch: yes
- Spencer: yes
- Bohacek: yes
- Dernulc: yes
- Leising: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Bray: yes
- Donato: yes
- Maxwell: yes
- Tomes: yes
- Brown: yes
- Doriot: yes
- Mishler: yes
- Walker G: yes
- Buchanan: yes
- Freeman: yes
- Niemeyer: yes
- Walker K: yes
- Buck: yes
- Gaskill: yes
- Niezgodski: yes
- Yoder: yes
- Busch: yes
- Glick: yes
- Pol: yes
- Young: yes
- Byrne: yes
- Goode: yes
- Qaddoura: yes
- Carrasco: yes
- Holdman: yes
- Raatz: yes
- Becker: excused
- Ford J.D.: excused
- Garten: excused
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:22:09.317128Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=IN&identifier=SB 172. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.