IN HB 1092
enactedChild services matters.
Indiana · 2026 Regular Session (2nd Regular Session, 124th General Assembly) · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did IN HB 1092 pass?
Yes. IN HB 1092 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-03-04): Public Law 78
What is IN HB 1092 about?
Requires a sports wagering certificate holder and vendor to withhold funds from a person who requests a certain type of withdrawal from the person's mobile sports wagering account if the person is delinquent in the person's child support payments. Requires an order establishing paternity to be obtained without further proceedings if certain conditions are met. Allows the state to approve additional payment facilities for purposes of accepting child support payments. Provides that if a child who is the subject of an adoption petition is also the subject of an open or pending child in need of services (CHINS) or delinquency proceeding, the adoption petition must identify: (1) the court in which the CHINS or delinquency proceeding is open or pending and the cause number; and (2) the case number of the CHINS or delinquency proceeding; if known to the petitioner. Requires a volunteer of an applicant for licensure as a child caring institution to undergo a criminal background check if the volunteer is likely to have unsupervised contact with children in the child caring institution or will have access to a child's medical records. Provides that the department may deny an application for licensure as a child caring institution, group home, or child placing agency if the applicant was previously licensed as a residential child care provider and the license was revoked within one year of the application. Provides that a department caseworker who wishes to interview a child at the child's school must provide the caseworker's department issued credential in order to interview the child alone.
Who sponsors IN HB 1092?
Greg Walker, Dale DeVon are the primary sponsors of IN HB 1092, joined by 2 cosponsors.
Description
Requires a sports wagering certificate holder and vendor to withhold funds from a person who requests a certain type of withdrawal from the person's mobile sports wagering account if the person is delinquent in the person's child support payments. Requires an order establishing paternity to be obtained without further proceedings if certain conditions are met. Allows the state to approve additional payment facilities for purposes of accepting child support payments. Provides that if a child who is the subject of an adoption petition is also the subject of an open or pending child in need of services (CHINS) or delinquency proceeding, the adoption petition must identify: (1) the court in which the CHINS or delinquency proceeding is open or pending and the cause number; and (2) the case number of the CHINS or delinquency proceeding; if known to the petitioner. Requires a volunteer of an applicant for licensure as a child caring institution to undergo a criminal background check if the volunteer is likely to have unsupervised contact with children in the child caring institution or will have access to a child's medical records. Provides that the department may deny an application for licensure as a child caring institution, group home, or child placing agency if the applicant was previously licensed as a residential child care provider and the license was revoked within one year of the application. Provides that a department caseworker who wishes to interview a child at the child's school must provide the caseworker's department issued credential in order to interview the child alone.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-03-04 — Public Law 78
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Greg Walkersponsor
- Dale DeVonauthor
- Lori Goss-Reavescoauthor
- Julie Olthoffcoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-04
Public Law 78
became-law
2026-03-04
Signed by the Governor
executive-signature
2026-02-27
Signed by the President of the Senate
passage
2026-02-27
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
passage
2026-02-26
Signed by the Speaker
passage
2026-02-25
Motion to concur filed
filing
2026-02-25
House concurred with Senate amendments; Roll Call 373: yeas 92, nays 0
2026-02-24
Returned to the House with amendments
receipt
2026-02-24
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 232: yeas 48, nays 0
passage,reading-3,reading-3
2026-02-19
Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed
reading-2
2026-02-19
Amendment #1 (Freeman) prevailed; voice vote
amendment-passage
2026-02-12
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
committee-passage
2026-02-05
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-02-03
Referred to the Senate
referral
2026-02-02
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 169: yeas 80, nays 0
passage,reading-3,reading-3
2026-02-02
Senate sponsor: Senator Walker G
2026-02-02
Representative Goss-Reaves added as coauthor
2026-01-28
Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed
reading-2
2026-01-28
Amendment #1 (DeVon) prevailed; voice vote
amendment-passage
2026-01-22
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
committee-passage
2026-01-12
Representative Olthoff added as coauthor
2026-01-05
First reading: referred to Committee on Family, Children and Human Affairs
reading-1,referral-committee
2026-01-05
Authored by Representative DeVon
Versions
Documents
Votes
HB 1092 - DeVon - 3rd Reading
2026-02-02 · pass · 80-0
Member-level votes (100)
- Abbott: yes
- Errington: yes
- Lauer: yes
- Payne: yes
- Andrade: yes
- Genda: yes
- Lawson: yes
- Pfaff: yes
- Aylesworth: yes
- GiaQuinta: yes
- Ledbetter: yes
- Pierce, K: yes
- Baird: yes
- Gore: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Pierce, M: yes
- Barrett: yes
- Goss-Reaves: yes
- Lindauer: yes
- Porter: yes
- Bartels: yes
- Greene: yes
- Lucas: yes
- Pryor: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Haggard: yes
- Manning: yes
- Rowray: yes
- Behning: yes
- Hall: yes
- May: yes
- Shackleford: yes
- Borders: yes
- Hamilton: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Shonkwiler: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Harris: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Smaltz: yes
- Carbaugh: yes
- Hatcher: yes
- McNamara: yes
- Smith, H: yes
- Cash: yes
- Heaton: yes
- Miller, D: yes
- Smith, V: yes
- Clere: yes
- Heine: yes
- Miller, K: yes
- Snow: yes
- Commons: yes
- Hostettler: yes
- Moed: yes
- Summers: yes
- Criswell: yes
- Isa: yes
- Morris: yes
- Sweet: yes
- Culp: yes
- Jackson, C: yes
- Moseley: yes
- Teshka: yes
- Dant Chesser: yes
- Johnson, B: yes
- Novak: yes
- Thompson: yes
- DeLaney: yes
- Judy: yes
- O'Brien: yes
- VanNatter: yes
- DeVon: yes
- King: yes
- Pack: yes
- Wesco: yes
- Engleman: yes
- Klinker: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Yocum: yes
- Bascom: excused
- Garcia Wilburn: excused
- Meltzer: excused
- Soliday: excused
- Bauer: excused
- Ireland: excused
- Olthoff: excused
- Steuerwald: excused
- Burton: excused
- Jeter: excused
- Prescott: excused
- Zimmerman: excused
- Davis: excused
- Jordan: excused
- Pressel: excused
- Dvorak: excused
- Lopez: excused
- Slager: excused
- Karickhoff: not voting
- Mr. Speaker: not voting
HB 1092 - Walker G - 3rd Reading
2026-02-24 · pass · 48-0
Member-level votes (50)
- Alexander: yes
- Carrasco: yes
- Glick: yes
- Niezgodski: yes
- Alting: yes
- Charbonneau: yes
- Goode: yes
- Qaddoura: yes
- Baldwin: yes
- Clark: yes
- Holdman: yes
- Raatz: yes
- Bassler: yes
- Crider: yes
- Hunley: yes
- Randolph: yes
- Becker: yes
- Deery: yes
- Jackson, L: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Bohacek: yes
- Dernulc: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Schmitt: yes
- Bray: yes
- Donato: yes
- Koch: yes
- Spencer: yes
- Brown: yes
- Doriot: yes
- Leising: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Buchanan: yes
- Ford J.D.: yes
- Maxwell: yes
- Tomes: yes
- Buck: yes
- Freeman: yes
- McKinley: yes
- Walker G: yes
- Busch: yes
- Garten: yes
- Mishler: yes
- Walker K: yes
- Byrne: yes
- Gaskill: yes
- Niemeyer: yes
- Yoder: yes
- Pol: excused
- Young: excused
HB 1092 - DeVon
2026-02-25 · pass · 92-0
Member-level votes (100)
- Abbott: yes
- Errington: yes
- Ledbetter: yes
- Pierce, M: yes
- Andrade: yes
- Garcia Wilburn: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Porter: yes
- Aylesworth: yes
- Genda: yes
- Lindauer: yes
- Prescott: yes
- Baird: yes
- GiaQuinta: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Pressel: yes
- Barrett: yes
- Gore: yes
- Lucas: yes
- Pryor: yes
- Bartels: yes
- Goss-Reaves: yes
- Manning: yes
- Rowray: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Greene: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Shackleford: yes
- Bauer: yes
- Haggard: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Shonkwiler: yes
- Behning: yes
- Hall: yes
- McNamara: yes
- Slager: yes
- Borders: yes
- Hamilton: yes
- Meltzer: yes
- Smaltz: yes
- Burton: yes
- Harris: yes
- Miller, D: yes
- Smith, H: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Heine: yes
- Miller, K: yes
- Smith, V: yes
- Carbaugh: yes
- Ireland: yes
- Moed: yes
- Snow: yes
- Clere: yes
- Isa: yes
- Morris: yes
- Soliday: yes
- Commons: yes
- Jackson, C: yes
- Moseley: yes
- Steuerwald: yes
- Criswell: yes
- Jeter: yes
- Novak: yes
- Summers: yes
- Culp: yes
- Johnson, B: yes
- O'Brien: yes
- Sweet: yes
- Dant Chesser: yes
- Jordan: yes
- Olthoff: yes
- Teshka: yes
- Davis: yes
- Judy: yes
- Pack: yes
- Thompson: yes
- DeLaney: yes
- King: yes
- Patterson: yes
- VanNatter: yes
- DeVon: yes
- Klinker: yes
- Payne: yes
- Wesco: yes
- Dvorak: yes
- Lauer: yes
- Pfaff: yes
- Yocum: yes
- Engleman: yes
- Lawson: yes
- Pierce, K: yes
- Zimmerman: yes
- Hatcher: excused
- May: excused
- Bascom: not voting
- Heaton: not voting
- Hostettler: not voting
- Karickhoff: not voting
- Cash: not voting
- Mr. Speaker: not voting
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:22:09.317128Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=IN&identifier=HB 1092. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.