FL SB 856
deadDisclosure of Estimated Ad Valorem Taxes
Florida · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did FL SB 856 pass?
No. FL SB 856 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-03-13): Died in Messages
What is FL SB 856 about?
Disclosure of Estimated Ad Valorem Taxes; Defining the terms “listing platform” and “property”; requiring that certain property listings include estimated ad valorem taxes; requiring the Department of Revenue to maintain on its website a table of links to each county’s property appraiser’s homepage and tax estimator; requiring the department to develop a formula that may be used by listing platforms to calculate the estimated ad valorem taxes; requiring the department to annually develop a countywide aggregate average millage rate for each county for use by listing platforms, etc.
Who sponsors FL SB 856?
DiCeglie, Rules are the primary sponsors of FL SB 856, joined by 6 cosponsors.
Description
Disclosure of Estimated Ad Valorem Taxes; Defining the terms “listing platform” and “property”; requiring that certain property listings include estimated ad valorem taxes; requiring the Department of Revenue to maintain on its website a table of links to each county’s property appraiser’s homepage and tax estimator; requiring the department to develop a formula that may be used by listing platforms to calculate the estimated ad valorem taxes; requiring the department to annually develop a countywide aggregate average millage rate for each county for use by listing platforms, etc.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-13
- Latest action
- 2026-03-13 — Died in Messages
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- DiCeglieprimary
- Rulesprimary
- Massullocosponsor
- Bermancosponsor
- Grallcosponsor
- Rousoncosponsor
- Avilacosponsor
- Shariefcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-13
Died in Messages
failure
2026-02-26
In Messages
2026-02-26
Immediately certified
2026-02-26
CS passed; YEAS 37 NAYS 0
passage
2026-02-26
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2026-02-26
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2026-02-23
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 02/26/26
2026-02-19
CS by Rules read 1st time
2026-02-19
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
2026-02-19
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
2026-02-17
CS by- Rules; YEAS 24 NAYS 0
2026-02-12
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/17/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
2026-02-05
Now in Rules
2026-02-05
Favorable by Appropriations; YEAS 17 NAYS 0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-02
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 02/05/26, 9:00 am, 110 Senate Building
2026-01-29
Now in Appropriations
2026-01-28
Favorable by Finance and Tax; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-01-23
On Committee agenda-- Finance and Tax, 01/28/26, 3:45 pm, 301 Senate Building
2026-01-13
Introduced
introduction
2025-12-16
Referred to Finance and Tax; Appropriations; Rules
referral-committee
2025-12-10
Filed
filing
Versions
Documents
Votes
Favorable
2026-01-28 · pass · 8-0
Member-level votes (8)
- Bernard: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Jones: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Passidomo: yes
- Rouson: yes
- Gaetz: yes
- Avila: yes
Favorable
2026-02-05 · pass · 17-0
Member-level votes (18)
- Berman: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Burgess: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Grall: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Martin: yes
- Massullo: yes
- McClain: yes
- Pizzo: yes
- Polsky: yes
- Sharief: yes
- Smith: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Wright: yes
- Rouson: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Garcia: other
Favorable with Committee Substitute
2026-02-17 · pass · 24-0
Member-level votes (24)
- Avila: yes
- Berman: yes
- Boyd: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Burgess: yes
- Burton: yes
- Davis: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Gaetz: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Grall: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Martin: yes
- Osgood: yes
- Pizzo: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Rouson: yes
- Simon: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Wright: yes
- Jones: yes
- Passidomo: yes
Third Reading
2026-02-26 · pass · 37-0
Member-level votes (39)
- Arrington: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Polsky: yes
- Avila: yes
- Grall: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Berman: yes
- Gruters: excused
- Rouson: yes
- Bernard: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Sharief: excused
- Boyd: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Simon: yes
- Bracy Davis: yes
- Jones: yes
- Smith: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Leek: yes
- Truenow: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Martin: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Burgess: yes
- Massullo: yes
- Wright: yes
- Burton: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Yarborough: yes
- Calatayud: yes
- McClain: yes
- Albritton: yes
- Davis: yes
- Osgood: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Passidomo: yes
- Gaetz: yes
- Pizzo: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:19:20.677932Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=FL&identifier=SB 856. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.