FL SB 838
deadElectronic Payments of Retail Installment Contracts
Florida · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did FL SB 838 pass?
No. FL SB 838 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-03-13): Died in Messages
What is FL SB 838 about?
Electronic Payments of Retail Installment Contracts; Defining the terms “ACH payment” and “electronic payment”; authorizing holders of retail installment contracts and their agents to collect fees for processing electronic payments made by motor vehicle retail buyers under certain circumstances, etc.
Who sponsors FL SB 838?
Yarborough, Commerce and Tourism are the primary sponsors of FL SB 838.
Description
Electronic Payments of Retail Installment Contracts; Defining the terms “ACH payment” and “electronic payment”; authorizing holders of retail installment contracts and their agents to collect fees for processing electronic payments made by motor vehicle retail buyers under certain circumstances, etc.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-13
- Latest action
- 2026-03-13 — Died in Messages
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Yarboroughprimary
- Commerce and Tourismprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-13
Died in Messages
failure
2026-02-19
In Messages
2026-02-19
Immediately certified
2026-02-19
CS passed as amended; YEAS 38 NAYS 0
passage
2026-02-19
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2026-02-19
Amendment(s) adopted (794450)
2026-02-19
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2026-02-18
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 02/19/26
2026-02-18
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
2026-02-17
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 24 NAYS 0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-12
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/17/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
2026-02-04
Now in Rules
2026-02-04
Favorable by Banking and Insurance; YEAS 10 NAYS 0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-01-30
On Committee agenda-- Banking and Insurance, 02/04/26, 10:30 am, 412 Knott Building
2026-01-14
CS by Commerce and Tourism read 1st time
2026-01-14
Now in Banking and Insurance
2026-01-14
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
2026-01-13
Introduced
introduction
2026-01-13
CS by Commerce and Tourism; YEAS 10 NAYS 0
2026-01-08
On Committee agenda-- Commerce and Tourism, 01/13/26, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
2025-12-16
Referred to Commerce and Tourism; Banking and Insurance; Rules
referral-committee
2025-12-09
Filed
filing
Versions
Documents
Votes
Favorable with Committee Substitute
2026-01-13 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (10)
- Bracy Davis: yes
- Davis: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- McClain: yes
- Smith: yes
- Wright: yes
- Yarborough: yes
- Arrington: yes
- Leek: yes
Favorable
2026-02-04 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (10)
- Boyd: yes
- Burton: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Martin: yes
- Osgood: yes
- Passidomo: yes
- Pizzo: yes
- Truenow: yes
- Sharief: yes
- Gruters: yes
Favorable
2026-02-17 · pass · 24-0
Member-level votes (24)
- Avila: yes
- Berman: yes
- Boyd: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Burgess: yes
- Burton: yes
- Davis: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Gaetz: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Grall: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Martin: yes
- Osgood: yes
- Pizzo: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Rouson: yes
- Simon: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Wright: yes
- Jones: yes
- Passidomo: yes
Third Reading
2026-02-19 · pass · 38-0
Member-level votes (39)
- Arrington: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Polsky: yes
- Avila: yes
- Grall: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Berman: yes
- Gruters: excused
- Rouson: yes
- Bernard: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Sharief: yes
- Boyd: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Simon: yes
- Bracy Davis: yes
- Jones: yes
- Smith: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Leek: yes
- Truenow: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Martin: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Burgess: yes
- Massullo: yes
- Wright: yes
- Burton: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Yarborough: yes
- Calatayud: yes
- McClain: yes
- Albritton: yes
- Davis: yes
- Osgood: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Passidomo: yes
- Gaetz: yes
- Pizzo: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:19:20.677932Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=FL&identifier=SB 838. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.