FL SB 4D
deadPublic Records/Investigations by the Department of Legal Affairs
Florida · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did FL SB 4D pass?
No. FL SB 4D did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-04-29): Died in Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee
What is FL SB 4D about?
Public Records/Investigations by the Department of Legal Affairs; Providing an exemption from public records requirements for information held by the Department of Legal Affairs relating to notifications or investigations of certain companion chatbot violations; providing an exemption from public records requirements for information held by the department relating to notifications or investigations of certain bot-related consumer protection violations; requiring that certain information remain confidential and exempt upon the completion or cessation of an investigation; providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemption; providing a statement of public necessity, etc.
Who sponsors FL SB 4D?
Brodeur is the primary sponsor of FL SB 4D.
Description
Public Records/Investigations by the Department of Legal Affairs; Providing an exemption from public records requirements for information held by the Department of Legal Affairs relating to notifications or investigations of certain companion chatbot violations; providing an exemption from public records requirements for information held by the department relating to notifications or investigations of certain bot-related consumer protection violations; requiring that certain information remain confidential and exempt upon the completion or cessation of an investigation; providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemption; providing a statement of public necessity, etc.
- Introduced
- 2026-04-28
- Latest action
- 2026-04-29 — Died in Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Brodeurprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-29
Died in Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee
failure
2026-04-28
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
filing,reading-1
2026-04-28
Now in Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee
2026-04-28
Referred to Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee
referral-committee
2026-04-28
In Messages
2026-04-28
Passed; YEAS 33 NAYS 4
passage
2026-04-28
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2026-04-28
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2026-04-28
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
2026-04-28
Withdrawn from Rules
withdrawal
2026-04-28
Introduced
introduction
2026-04-28
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/28/26, 2:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
2026-04-24
Referred to Rules
referral-committee
2026-04-24
Filed
filing
Versions
Documents
Votes
Third Reading
2026-04-28 · pass · 33-4
Member-level votes (40)
- Arrington: yes
- Garcia: no
- Pizzo: yes
- Avila: yes
- Grall: no
- Berman: no
- Gruters: excused
- Rodriguez: yes
- Bernard: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Rouson: yes
- Boyd: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Sharief: yes
- Bracy Davis: yes
- Jones: yes
- Simon: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Leek: excused
- Smith: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Martin: yes
- Truenow: yes
- Burgess: yes
- Massullo: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Burton: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Wright: yes
- Calatayud: yes
- McClain: yes
- Yarborough: yes
- Davis: yes
- Nathan: yes
- Albritton: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Osgood: yes
- Gaetz: no
- Passidomo: yes
- Polsky: not voting
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:19:32.455430Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=FL&identifier=SB 4D. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.