FL SB 434
deadAssessment of Property Used for Residential Purposes
Florida · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did FL SB 434 pass?
No. FL SB 434 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-03-13): Died in Messages
What is FL SB 434 about?
Assessment of Property Used for Residential Purposes; Defining the term “changes or improvements made to improve the property’s resistance to wind damage”; prohibiting the consideration of the increase in just value of a property which is attributable to changes or improvements made to improve the property’s resistance to wind damage in determinations of the assessed value of certain property, etc.
Who sponsors FL SB 434?
Leek is the primary sponsor of FL SB 434, joined by 1 cosponsor.
Description
Assessment of Property Used for Residential Purposes; Defining the term “changes or improvements made to improve the property’s resistance to wind damage”; prohibiting the consideration of the increase in just value of a property which is attributable to changes or improvements made to improve the property’s resistance to wind damage in determinations of the assessed value of certain property, etc.
- Introduced
- 2026-01-13
- Latest action
- 2026-03-13 — Died in Messages
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Leekprimary
- Gaetzcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-13
Died in Messages
failure
2026-02-19
In Messages
2026-02-19
Immediately certified
2026-02-19
Passed; YEAS 38 NAYS 0
passage
2026-02-19
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2026-02-19
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2026-02-18
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 02/19/26
2026-02-18
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
2026-02-17
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 24 NAYS 0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-12
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/17/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
2026-02-05
Now in Rules
2026-02-05
Favorable by Appropriations; YEAS 16 NAYS 0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-02
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 02/05/26, 9:00 am, 110 Senate Building
2026-01-29
Now in Appropriations
2026-01-28
Favorable by Finance and Tax; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
committee-passage-favorable
2026-01-23
On Committee agenda-- Finance and Tax, 01/28/26, 3:45 pm, 301 Senate Building
2026-01-13
Introduced
introduction
2025-12-01
Referred to Finance and Tax; Appropriations; Rules
referral-committee
2025-11-07
Filed
filing
Versions
Documents
Votes
Favorable
2026-01-28 · pass · 8-0
Member-level votes (8)
- Bernard: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Jones: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Passidomo: yes
- Rouson: yes
- Gaetz: yes
- Avila: yes
Favorable
2026-02-05 · pass · 16-0
Member-level votes (18)
- Berman: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Burgess: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Grall: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Massullo: yes
- McClain: yes
- Pizzo: yes
- Polsky: yes
- Sharief: yes
- Smith: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Wright: yes
- Rouson: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Garcia: other
- Martin: other
Favorable
2026-02-17 · pass · 24-0
Member-level votes (24)
- Avila: yes
- Berman: yes
- Boyd: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Burgess: yes
- Burton: yes
- Davis: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Gaetz: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Grall: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Martin: yes
- Osgood: yes
- Pizzo: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Rouson: yes
- Simon: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Wright: yes
- Jones: yes
- Passidomo: yes
Third Reading
2026-02-19 · pass · 38-0
Member-level votes (39)
- Arrington: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Polsky: yes
- Avila: yes
- Grall: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Berman: yes
- Gruters: excused
- Rouson: yes
- Bernard: yes
- Harrell: yes
- Sharief: yes
- Boyd: yes
- Hooper: yes
- Simon: yes
- Bracy Davis: yes
- Jones: yes
- Smith: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Leek: yes
- Truenow: yes
- Brodeur: yes
- Martin: yes
- Trumbull: yes
- Burgess: yes
- Massullo: yes
- Wright: yes
- Burton: yes
- Mayfield: yes
- Yarborough: yes
- Calatayud: yes
- McClain: yes
- Albritton: yes
- Davis: yes
- Osgood: yes
- DiCeglie: yes
- Passidomo: yes
- Gaetz: yes
- Pizzo: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:19:20.677932Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=FL&identifier=SB 434. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.