Bill Commons

FL HB 95

died on adjournment

Security Services on Religious Premises

Florida · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did FL HB 95 pass?

No. FL HB 95 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-11): Laid on Table; Companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 52 (Ch. 2026-46)

What is FL HB 95 about?

Security Services on Religious Premises; Exempts certain persons providing voluntary armed security services at churches or ecclesiastical or denominational organizations from specified requirements; provides requirements such persons must meet to qualify for exemption.

Who sponsors FL HB 95?

Blanco, Grow are the primary sponsors of FL HB 95, joined by 18 cosponsors.

Description

Security Services on Religious Premises; Exempts certain persons providing voluntary armed security services at churches or ecclesiastical or denominational organizations from specified requirements; provides requirements such persons must meet to qualify for exemption.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-03-11 — Laid on Table; Companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 52 (Ch. 2026-46)
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Blancoprimary
  • Growprimary
  • Steelecosponsor
  • Salzmancosponsor
  • Plasenciacosponsor
  • Plakoncosponsor
  • Partingtoncosponsor
  • Nixcosponsor
  • Millercosponsor
  • López, J.cosponsor
  • Yeagercosponsor
  • Fabriciocosponsor
  • Buchanancosponsor
  • Boylescosponsor
  • Benarrochcosponsor
  • Barnabycosponsor
  • Banksoncosponsor
  • Andersoncosponsor
  • Hinsoncosponsor
  • Yarkoskycosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-03-11

    Laid on Table, refer to CS/SB 52

    deferral

  2. 2026-03-11

    Laid on Table; Companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 52 (Ch. 2026-46)

    deferral

  3. 2026-02-10

    Added to Second Reading Calendar

  4. 2026-02-10

    Bill released to House Calendar

  5. 2026-02-10

    Reported out of Judiciary Committee

  6. 2026-02-10

    Favorable by Judiciary Committee

    committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2026-02-06

    Added to Judiciary Committee agenda

  8. 2026-02-05

    Now in Judiciary Committee

  9. 2026-02-05

    Reported out of Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee

  10. 2026-02-05

    Favorable by Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee

    committee-passage-favorable

  11. 2026-02-03

    Added to Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee agenda

  12. 2026-01-28

    Now in Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee

  13. 2026-01-28

    Reported out of Criminal Justice Subcommittee

  14. 2026-01-28

    Favorable by Criminal Justice Subcommittee

    committee-passage-favorable

  15. 2026-01-26

    Added to Criminal Justice Subcommittee agenda

  16. 2026-01-13

    1st Reading (Original Filed Version)

    filing,reading-1

  17. 2025-10-14

    Now in Criminal Justice Subcommittee

  18. 2025-10-14

    Referred to Judiciary Committee

    referral-committee

  19. 2025-10-14

    Referred to Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee

    referral-committee

  20. 2025-10-14

    Referred to Criminal Justice Subcommittee

    referral-committee

  21. 2025-10-07

    Filed

    filing

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Favorable (Criminal Justice Subcommittee)

    2026-01-28 · pass · 17-0

    Member-level votes (17)
    • Alvarez, D.: yes
    • Baker: yes
    • Bankson: yes
    • Barnaby: yes
    • Bartleman: yes
    • Brackett: yes
    • Fabricio: yes
    • Gottlieb: yes
    • Greco: yes
    • Grow: yes
    • Hart-Lowman: yes
    • López, J.: yes
    • Partington: yes
    • Plakon: yes
    • Skidmore: yes
    • Steele: yes
    • Yarkosky: yes
  • Favorable (Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee)

    2026-02-05 · pass · 16-0

    Member-level votes (18)
    • Antone: yes
    • Benarroch: yes
    • Boyles: yes
    • Cross: yes
    • Eskamani: yes
    • Gentry: yes
    • Giallombardo: yes
    • Hinson: yes
    • McFarland: yes
    • Miller: yes
    • Nixon: not voting
    • Oliver: yes
    • Overdorf: yes
    • Porras: not voting
    • Sapp: yes
    • Spencer: yes
    • Valdés: yes
    • Yeager: yes
  • Favorable (Judiciary Committee)

    2026-02-10 · pass · 17-0

    Member-level votes (21)
    • Albert: yes
    • Alvarez, D.: yes
    • Anderson: yes
    • Antone: yes
    • Baker: yes
    • Barnaby: not voting
    • Borrero: yes
    • Brannan: yes
    • Cassel: not voting
    • Chambliss: not voting
    • Daley: yes
    • Fabricio: yes
    • Gottlieb: yes
    • Joseph: not voting
    • Koster: yes
    • López, J.: yes
    • Maney: yes
    • Plakon: yes
    • Porras: yes
    • Salzman: yes
    • Steele: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-08-04T00:47:57.419537Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=FL&identifier=HB 95. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.