Bill Commons

FL HB 139

dead

Adverse Personnel Actions and Ethics Complaints

Florida · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did FL HB 139 pass?

No. FL HB 139 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-03-13): Died on Second Reading Calendar

What is FL HB 139 about?

Adverse Personnel Actions and Ethics Complaints; Prohibits agencies & independent contractors from taking specified actions against employees for disclosing certain information to Commission on Ethics; requires that information disclosed include specified violations or alleged violations; requires disclosure of specified information to commission; provides that specified provisions protect employees who submit written complaints to commission or provide information to investigator during investigation of complaint or referral; authorizes certain employees to file complaints in accordance with specified provisions; authorizes such employees to pursue specified administrative remedy or civil action within specified timeframe; authorizes local public employees to file complaint with appropriate local governmental authority; specifies requirements for administrative procedures created by local governmental authorities; authorizes such employees to bring civil actions in court of competent jurisdiction under specified conditions; provides that it is affirmative defense to certain actions that adverse personnel action was predicated on grounds other than exercising of certain protected rights; requires commission to deliver complaints & any amendment thereto to agency conducting certain investigation, upon agency's written request; provides that such delivery does not affect specified exemptions in regard to complaint & amendments; requires that such delivery be within reasonable timeframe; requires that commission redact certain information under specified conditions; requires commission to deliver complaints & any amendment thereto to certain persons upon notarized written request.

Who sponsors FL HB 139?

Maney, State Affairs Committee are the primary sponsors of FL HB 139, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Description

Adverse Personnel Actions and Ethics Complaints; Prohibits agencies & independent contractors from taking specified actions against employees for disclosing certain information to Commission on Ethics; requires that information disclosed include specified violations or alleged violations; requires disclosure of specified information to commission; provides that specified provisions protect employees who submit written complaints to commission or provide information to investigator during investigation of complaint or referral; authorizes certain employees to file complaints in accordance with specified provisions; authorizes such employees to pursue specified administrative remedy or civil action within specified timeframe; authorizes local public employees to file complaint with appropriate local governmental authority; specifies requirements for administrative procedures created by local governmental authorities; authorizes such employees to bring civil actions in court of competent jurisdiction under specified conditions; provides that it is affirmative defense to certain actions that adverse personnel action was predicated on grounds other than exercising of certain protected rights; requires commission to deliver complaints & any amendment thereto to agency conducting certain investigation, upon agency's written request; provides that such delivery does not affect specified exemptions in regard to complaint & amendments; requires that such delivery be within reasonable timeframe; requires that commission redact certain information under specified conditions; requires commission to deliver complaints & any amendment thereto to certain persons upon notarized written request.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-03-13 — Died on Second Reading Calendar
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Maneyprimary
  • State Affairs Committeeprimary
  • Benarrochcosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-03-13

    Died on Second Reading Calendar

    failure

  2. 2026-03-02

    Added to Second Reading Calendar

  3. 2026-03-02

    1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)

    reading-1

  4. 2026-03-02

    Bill referred to House Calendar

  5. 2026-02-27

    CS Filed

    filing

  6. 2026-02-27

    Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)

    deferral

  7. 2026-02-27

    Reported out of State Affairs Committee

  8. 2026-02-26

    Favorable with CS by State Affairs Committee

    committee-passage-favorable

  9. 2026-02-24

    Added to State Affairs Committee agenda

  10. 2026-02-19

    Now in State Affairs Committee

  11. 2026-02-19

    Reported out of Rules & Ethics Committee

  12. 2026-02-19

    Favorable by Rules & Ethics Committee

    committee-passage-favorable

  13. 2026-02-17

    Added to Rules & Ethics Committee agenda

  14. 2026-02-11

    Now in Rules & Ethics Committee

  15. 2026-02-11

    Reported out of Government Operations Subcommittee

  16. 2026-02-11

    Favorable by Government Operations Subcommittee

    committee-passage-favorable

  17. 2026-02-09

    Added to Government Operations Subcommittee agenda

  18. 2026-01-13

    1st Reading (Original Filed Version)

    filing,reading-1

  19. 2025-10-21

    Now in Government Operations Subcommittee

  20. 2025-10-21

    Referred to State Affairs Committee

    referral-committee

  21. 2025-10-21

    Referred to Rules & Ethics Committee

    referral-committee

  22. 2025-10-21

    Referred to Government Operations Subcommittee

    referral-committee

  23. 2025-10-09

    Filed

    filing

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Favorable (Government Operations Subcommittee)

    2026-02-11 · pass · 18-0

    Member-level votes (18)
    • Alvarez, J.: yes
    • Aristide: yes
    • Basabe: yes
    • Campbell: yes
    • Chaney: yes
    • Conerly: yes
    • Gentry: yes
    • Greco: yes
    • Griffitts: yes
    • Holcomb: yes
    • Nix: yes
    • Plasencia: yes
    • Rosenwald: yes
    • Sapp: yes
    • Stark: yes
    • Valdés: yes
    • Weinberger: yes
    • Young: yes
  • Favorable (Rules & Ethics Committee)

    2026-02-19 · pass · 14-0

    Member-level votes (17)
    • Bankson: yes
    • Borrero: yes
    • Canady: yes
    • Esposito: yes
    • Fabricio: not voting
    • Garrison: yes
    • Gottlieb: yes
    • Hart-Lowman: yes
    • Hunschofsky: not voting
    • Plasencia: not voting
    • Salzman: yes
    • Sirois: yes
    • Smith: yes
    • Tant: yes
    • Trabulsy: yes
    • Tramont: yes
    • Woodson: yes
  • Favorable With Committee Substitute (State Affairs Committee)

    2026-02-26 · pass · 26-0

    Member-level votes (27)
    • Basabe: yes
    • Blanco: yes
    • Botana: yes
    • Boyles: yes
    • Chaney: yes
    • Cobb: yes
    • Cross: yes
    • Driskell: yes
    • Duggan: yes
    • Eskamani: yes
    • Gantt: yes
    • Gentry: yes
    • Giallombardo: yes
    • Gonzalez Pittman: yes
    • Griffitts: yes
    • Holcomb: yes
    • Jacques: yes
    • Maggard: yes
    • McFarland: yes
    • Mooney: yes
    • Nixon: yes
    • Owen: yes
    • Robinson, W.: yes
    • Spencer: yes
    • Tendrich: yes
    • Weinberger: yes
    • Young: not voting

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-08-21T20:48:03.558590Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=FL&identifier=HB 139. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.