FL HB 1139
deadImpact Fees
Florida · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did FL HB 1139 pass?
No. FL HB 1139 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-03-13): Died in Rules, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 1329 (Ch. 2026-161)
What is FL HB 1139 about?
Impact Fees; Provides requirements for coordination mechanisms that are required for certain agreements required as part of intergovernmental coordination element of comprehensive plan; requires that plan-based methodology used for certain interlocal agreements be consistent with certain comprehensive plan requirements; requires that demonstrated-need study use plan-based methodology; prohibits local governments, school districts, & special districts from including certain deductions in certain impact fee increases & from increasing impact fee rates beyond certain phase-in limitations by more than specified percentage; provides that prevailing petitioner is entitled to impact fee overpayment refund, with interest; provides that certain prevailing petitioners are entitled to reasonable attorney fees & costs.
Who sponsors FL HB 1139?
Basabe, Gentry, Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee and 1 others are the primary sponsors of FL HB 1139.
Description
Impact Fees; Provides requirements for coordination mechanisms that are required for certain agreements required as part of intergovernmental coordination element of comprehensive plan; requires that plan-based methodology used for certain interlocal agreements be consistent with certain comprehensive plan requirements; requires that demonstrated-need study use plan-based methodology; prohibits local governments, school districts, & special districts from including certain deductions in certain impact fee increases & from increasing impact fee rates beyond certain phase-in limitations by more than specified percentage; provides that prevailing petitioner is entitled to impact fee overpayment refund, with interest; provides that certain prevailing petitioners are entitled to reasonable attorney fees & costs.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-03-13 — Died in Rules, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 1329 (Ch. 2026-161)
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Basabeprimary
- Gentryprimary
- Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommitteeprimary
- State Affairs Committeeprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-13
Died in Rules, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 1329 (Ch. 2026-161)
failure
2026-03-04
Received
enrolled
2026-03-04
Referred to Rules
referral-committee
2026-03-04
In Messages
2026-03-04
CS passed; YEAS 109, NAYS 2
passage
2026-03-04
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2026-03-04
Added to Third Reading Calendar
2026-03-04
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2026-02-26
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (3/4/2026)
2026-02-11
Added to Second Reading Calendar
2026-02-11
Bill referred to House Calendar
2026-02-10
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
reading-1
2026-02-10
CS Filed
filing
2026-02-10
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
deferral
2026-02-10
Reported out of State Affairs Committee
2026-02-10
Favorable with CS by State Affairs Committee
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-06
Added to State Affairs Committee agenda
2026-02-05
Now in State Affairs Committee
2026-02-05
Reported out of Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
2026-02-05
Favorable by Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
committee-passage-favorable
2026-02-03
Added to Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee agenda
2026-01-29
Now in Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
2026-01-29
Referred to State Affairs Committee
referral-committee
2026-01-29
Referred to Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
referral-committee
2026-01-28
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
reading-1
2026-01-28
CS Filed
filing
2026-01-28
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
deferral
2026-01-28
Reported out of Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
2026-01-28
Favorable with CS by Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
committee-passage-favorable
2026-01-26
Added to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee agenda
2026-01-13
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
filing,reading-1
2026-01-12
Now in Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
2026-01-12
Referred to State Affairs Committee
referral-committee
2026-01-12
Referred to Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
referral-committee
2026-01-12
Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
referral-committee
2026-01-07
Filed
filing
Versions
Documents
Votes
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee)
2026-01-28 · pass · 12-0
Favorable (Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee)
2026-02-05 · pass · 16-0
Favorable With Committee Substitute (State Affairs Committee)
2026-02-10 · pass · 25-0
Passage, Third Reading
2026-03-04 · pass · 109-2
Member-level votes (117)
- Abbott: yes
- Eskamani: yes
- Oliver: yes
- Albert: yes
- Esposito: yes
- Overdorf: yes
- Alvarez, D.: yes
- Fabricio: yes
- Owen: yes
- Alvarez, J.: yes
- Franklin: yes
- Partington: yes
- Anderson: yes
- Gantt: no
- Perez: yes
- Andrade: yes
- Garrison: yes
- Persons-Mulicka: yes
- Antone: no
- Gentry: yes
- Plakon: yes
- Aristide: yes
- Gerwig: yes
- Plasencia: yes
- Baker: yes
- Giallombardo: yes
- Porras: yes
- Bankson: yes
- Gonzalez Pittman: yes
- Rayner: yes
- Barnaby: yes
- Gossett-Seidman: yes
- Redondo: yes
- Bartleman: yes
- Gottlieb: yes
- Rizo: yes
- Basabe: yes
- Greco: yes
- Robinson, F.: yes
- Benarroch: yes
- Griffitts: yes
- Robinson, W.: yes
- Berfield: yes
- Grow: yes
- Rosenwald: yes
- Black: yes
- Harris: yes
- Salzman: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Hart-Lowman: yes
- Sapp: yes
- Booth: yes
- Hinson: yes
- Shoaf: yes
- Borrero: yes
- Hodgers: yes
- Sirois: yes
- Botana: yes
- Holcomb: yes
- Skidmore: yes
- Boyles: yes
- Hunschofsky: yes
- Smith: yes
- Brackett: yes
- Jacques: yes
- Snyder: yes
- Brannan: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Spencer: yes
- Buchanan: yes
- Stark: yes
- Busatta: yes
- Kendall: yes
- Steele: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Kincart Jonsson: yes
- Tant: yes
- Canady: yes
- Koster: yes
- Tendrich: yes
- Cassel: yes
- LaMarca: yes
- Tomkow: yes
- Chamberlin: yes
- Long: yes
- Trabulsy: yes
- Chambliss: yes
- López, J.: yes
- Tramont: yes
- Chaney: yes
- Maggard: yes
- Tuck: yes
- Cobb: yes
- Maney: yes
- Valdés: yes
- Conerly: yes
- McClure: yes
- Weinberger: yes
- McFarland: yes
- Woodson: yes
- Daley: yes
- Melo: yes
- Yarkosky: yes
- Daniels: yes
- Driskell: yes
- Miller: yes
- Young: yes
- Duggan: yes
- Mooney: yes
- Dunkley: yes
- Nix: yes
- Joseph: not voting
- Cross: not voting
- Michael: not voting
- Yeager: not voting
- Edmonds: not voting
- Nixon: not voting
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:19:20.677932Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=FL&identifier=HB 1139. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.