CO SB 98
died on adjournmentState & Local Noise Abatement Authority
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO SB 98 pass?
No. CO SB 98 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-04-14): House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Postpone Indefinitely
What is CO SB 98 about?
Under current law, there are statewide standards for noise level limits for various time periods and areas, and noise in excess of those limits is a public nuisance. The statewide noise level limits do not apply to the use of property for certain purposes. The bill states that the statewide noise level limits also do not apply to the following:The use of property owned or controlled by the state or a political subdivision of the state;The use of property pursuant to a permit or license that addresses sound emitted and that is issued by a local government; andThe use of property owned or controlled by a nonprofit entity for a cultural, entertainment, athletic, or patriotic event.(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Who sponsors CO SB 98?
M. Ball, M. Lindsay, M. Brooks and 1 others are the primary sponsors of CO SB 98, joined by 4 cosponsors.
Description
Under current law, there are statewide standards for noise level limits for various time periods and areas, and noise in excess of those limits is a public nuisance. The statewide noise level limits do not apply to the use of property for certain purposes. The bill states that the statewide noise level limits also do not apply to the following:The use of property owned or controlled by the state or a political subdivision of the state;The use of property pursuant to a permit or license that addresses sound emitted and that is issued by a local government; andThe use of property owned or controlled by a nonprofit entity for a cultural, entertainment, athletic, or patriotic event.(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Introduced
- 2026-02-11
- Latest action
- 2026-04-14 — House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Postpone Indefinitely
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- M. Ballsponsor
- M. Lindsaysponsor
- M. Brookssponsor
- L. Listonsponsor
- R. Rodriguezcosponsor
- J. Marchmancosponsor
- W. Lindstedtcosponsor
- J. Colemancosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-14
House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Postpone Indefinitely
2026-04-07
House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed
2026-03-19
Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government
introduction
2026-03-18
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-17
Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments
reading-2
2026-03-12
Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-02-11
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Refer Senate Bill 26-098 to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-03-12 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Mark Baisley: yes
- Matt Ball: yes
- William Lindstedt: yes
- Larry Liston: yes
- Janice Rich: yes
- Marc Snyder: no
- Tony Exum: no
Adopt amendment L.013 (Attachment B)
2026-04-14 · pass · 0-0
Adopt amendment L.012 (Attachment A)
2026-04-14 · pass · 0-0
Refer Senate Bill 26-098, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-04-14 · fail · 0-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Andrew Boesenecker: yes
- Max Brooks: yes
- Jamie Jackson: no
- Mandy Lindsay: yes
- Kenny Nguyen: yes
- Amy Paschal: no
- Jacque Phillips: no
- Chris Richardson: no
- Larry Don Suckla: no
- Elizabeth Velasco: no
- Ron Weinberg: yes
- Rebekah Stewart: yes
- Meg Froelich: no
Postpone Senate Bill 26-098 indefinitely using a reversal of the previous roll call. There was no objection to the use of the reverse roll call, therefore, the bill was postponed indefinitely.
2026-04-14 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Andrew Boesenecker: no
- Max Brooks: no
- Jamie Jackson: yes
- Mandy Lindsay: no
- Kenny Nguyen: no
- Amy Paschal: yes
- Jacque Phillips: yes
- Chris Richardson: yes
- Larry Don Suckla: yes
- Elizabeth Velasco: yes
- Ron Weinberg: no
- Rebekah Stewart: no
- Meg Froelich: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T03:52:26.466301Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=SB 98. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.