CO SB 87
died on adjournmentCreate Legislative Leave Job Protection for General Assembly Members
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO SB 87 pass?
No. CO SB 87 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-04-08): Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Adhere
What is CO SB 87 about?
The bill authorizes legislative leave and job protection for qualified members of the general assembly (qualified members) who are engaged in employment outside of their duties related to the general assembly. More specifically, the bill states that , beginning January 1, 2027 :A qualified member can take a leave of absence from their outside employment during regular and special legislative sessions;A qualified member's outside employer has discretion to grant legislative leave as paid, unpaid, or partially paid;A qualified member's outside employer cannot terminate the qualified member's outside employment on the basis that the qualified member requests or takes legislative leave; andWhen a qualified member returns to their outside employment following legislative leave, the qualified member is entitled to be restored to the same or an equivalent employment position. The bill excepts that qualified members actively serving a 4-year term at the time the bill takes effect are only eligible to take legislative leave beginning January 1, 2029.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Who sponsors CO SB 87?
K. Nguyen, M. Lindsay, K. Wallace and 1 others are the primary sponsors of CO SB 87, joined by 9 cosponsors.
Description
The bill authorizes legislative leave and job protection for qualified members of the general assembly (qualified members) who are engaged in employment outside of their duties related to the general assembly. More specifically, the bill states that , beginning January 1, 2027 :A qualified member can take a leave of absence from their outside employment during regular and special legislative sessions;A qualified member's outside employer has discretion to grant legislative leave as paid, unpaid, or partially paid;A qualified member's outside employer cannot terminate the qualified member's outside employment on the basis that the qualified member requests or takes legislative leave; andWhen a qualified member returns to their outside employment following legislative leave, the qualified member is entitled to be restored to the same or an equivalent employment position. The bill excepts that qualified members actively serving a 4-year term at the time the bill takes effect are only eligible to take legislative leave beginning January 1, 2029.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Introduced
- 2026-02-10
- Latest action
- 2026-04-08 — Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Adhere
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- K. Nguyensponsor
- M. Lindsaysponsor
- K. Wallacesponsor
- B. Peltonsponsor
- C. Kippcosponsor
- I. Jodehcosponsor
- R. Stewartcosponsor
- J. Gonzalescosponsor
- J. Colemancosponsor
- N. Hinrichsencosponsor
- M. Weissmancosponsor
- J. Marchmancosponsor
- W. Lindstedtcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-08
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Adhere
2026-04-02
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-31
House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
2026-03-30
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Floor
2026-03-26
House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-03-16
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-16
Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs
introduction
2026-03-16
Senate Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
passage,reading-3
2026-03-13
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
reading-2
2026-03-10
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/13/2026 - No Amendments
2026-03-09
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/10/2026 - No Amendments
2026-03-06
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/09/2026 - No Amendments
2026-03-03
Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-02-10
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Refer Senate Bill 26-087 to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-03-03 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (5)
- William Lindstedt: yes
- Rod Pelton: no
- Janice Rich: no
- Tom Sullivan: yes
- Katie Wallace: yes
Refer Senate Bill 26-087 to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-03-26 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (11)
- Scott Bottoms: no
- Brandi Bradley: no
- Michael Carter: no
- Cecelia Espenoza: no
- Lisa Feret: yes
- Meg Froelich: yes
- Stephanie Luck: no
- Kenny Nguyen: yes
- Naquetta Ricks: yes
- Chad Clifford: yes
- Jenny Willford: yes
BILL
2026-04-02 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: yes
- Barron: no
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: no
- Bradfield: no
- Bradley: no
- Brooks: no
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: no
- Camacho: yes
- Carter: no
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: no
- Duran: no
- English: excused
- Espenoza: yes
- Feret: yes
- Flanell: no
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: no
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: yes
- Gonzalez R.: no
- Hamrick: yes
- Hartsook: no
- Jackson: yes
- Johnson: no
- Joseph: yes
- Keltie: no
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: no
- Lukens: no
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: no
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: no
- McCormick: no
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: no
- Phillips: no
- Richardson: no
- Ricks: yes
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: no
- Smith: yes
- Soper: no
- Stewart K.: yes
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: no
- Taggart: no
- Titone: yes
- Valdez: no
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: no
- Willford: yes
- Winter T.: no
- Woodrow: yes
- Woog: no
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
RECEDE
2026-05-07 · fail · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: yes
- Barron: no
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: no
- Bradfield: no
- Bradley: no
- Brooks: no
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: no
- Camacho: no
- Carter: no
- Clifford: no
- DeGraaf: no
- Duran: no
- English: no
- Espenoza: no
- Feret: excused
- Flanell: no
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: no
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: no
- Gonzalez R.: no
- Hamrick: no
- Hartsook: no
- Jackson: no
- Johnson: no
- Joseph: no
- Keltie: no
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: no
- Lukens: no
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: no
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: no
- McCormick: no
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: no
- Phillips: no
- Richardson: no
- Ricks: no
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: no
- Smith: yes
- Soper: no
- Stewart K.: no
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: no
- Taggart: no
- Titone: yes
- Valdez: no
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: no
- Willford: yes
- Winter T.: no
- Woodrow: yes
- Woog: no
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T03:52:26.466301Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=SB 87. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.