CO SB 57
died on adjournmentSchool Board Elections Director District Residents
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO SB 57 pass?
No. CO SB 57 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-02-24): Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Postpone Indefinitely
What is CO SB 57 about?
Under current law, local school board members are voted on at large by the eligible electors of the school district, with exceptions.The bill requires that local school board members be voted on by the eligible electors residing within the director district and creates an exclusion of this requirement for school districts that enroll fewer than 6,500 students.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Who sponsors CO SB 57?
B. Marshall, M. Baisley are the primary sponsors of CO SB 57.
Description
Under current law, local school board members are voted on at large by the eligible electors of the school district, with exceptions.The bill requires that local school board members be voted on by the eligible electors residing within the director district and creates an exclusion of this requirement for school districts that enroll fewer than 6,500 students.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
- Introduced
- 2026-01-28
- Latest action
- 2026-02-24 — Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Postpone Indefinitely
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- B. Marshallsponsor
- M. Baisleysponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-02-24
Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Postpone Indefinitely
2026-01-28
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Postpone Senate Bill 26-057 indefinitely using a reversal of the previous roll call. There was no objection to the use of the reverse roll call, therefore, the bill was postponed indefinitely.
2026-02-24 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (5)
- William Lindstedt: yes
- Mark Baisley: no
- Lynda Zamora Wilson: no
- Tom Sullivan: yes
- Katie Wallace: yes
Refer Senate Bill 26-057 to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-02-24 · fail · 0-0
Member-level votes (5)
- Mark Baisley: yes
- William Lindstedt: no
- Lynda Zamora Wilson: yes
- Tom Sullivan: no
- Katie Wallace: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T03:52:26.466301Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=SB 57. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.