CO SB 174
enactedProhibit Lead Generation Legal Marketing
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO SB 174 pass?
Yes. CO SB 174 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-04-21): Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
What is CO SB 174 about?
The act establishes that the practice of lead generation marketing for legal services is a deceptive trade practice that is subject to enforcement under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act'. 'Lead generation legal marketing' is defined in the act as a form of marketing in which a lawyer, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional pays money or other compensation to a third party to receive information about a potential client or case, including the potential client's contact information or information about the potential client's legal issue or case. Unless a person meets certain criteria, the act prohibits a person from paying money or other compensation for lead generation legal marketing services, engaging in the practice of lead generation legal marketing, or selling leads to an attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional. A person may solicit or market for legal services in Colorado only if the person is:Authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado;Working on behalf of a person authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado and that person is clearly identified in any advertisement, marketing materials, information, or resources; orA nonprofit organization that engages in legal services. The act establishes that a person that engages in the practice of lead generation legal marketing may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors CO SB 174?
L. García, M. Soper, M. Carter and 1 others are the primary sponsors of CO SB 174, joined by 18 cosponsors.
Description
The act establishes that the practice of lead generation marketing for legal services is a deceptive trade practice that is subject to enforcement under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act'. 'Lead generation legal marketing' is defined in the act as a form of marketing in which a lawyer, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional pays money or other compensation to a third party to receive information about a potential client or case, including the potential client's contact information or information about the potential client's legal issue or case. Unless a person meets certain criteria, the act prohibits a person from paying money or other compensation for lead generation legal marketing services, engaging in the practice of lead generation legal marketing, or selling leads to an attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional. A person may solicit or market for legal services in Colorado only if the person is:Authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado;Working on behalf of a person authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado and that person is clearly identified in any advertisement, marketing materials, information, or resources; orA nonprofit organization that engages in legal services. The act establishes that a person that engages in the practice of lead generation legal marketing may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Introduced
- 2026-04-21
- Latest action
- 2026-04-21 — Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- L. Garcíasponsor
- M. Sopersponsor
- M. Cartersponsor
- D. Robertssponsor
- M. Lindsaycosponsor
- E. Hamrickcosponsor
- C. Cliffordcosponsor
- K. Wallacecosponsor
- M. Snydercosponsor
- R. Rodriguezcosponsor
- C. Kippcosponsor
- M. Rutinelcosponsor
- L. Daughertycosponsor
- L. Cuttercosponsor
- J. Colemancosponsor
- J. Bridgescosponsor
- A. Benavidezcosponsor
- M. Ballcosponsor
- T. Exumcosponsor
- J. Phillipscosponsor
- K. Nguyencosponsor
- J. Mabreycosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-06-03
Governor Signed
executive-signature
2026-05-27
Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt
2026-05-26
Signed by the President of the Senate
passage
2026-05-26
Signed by the Speaker of the House
passage
2026-05-07
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-05-06
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
2026-05-05
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-04-30
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-04-30
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
introduction
2026-04-29
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
2026-04-27
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-04-21
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment A)
2026-04-27 · pass · 0-0
Adopt amendment L.003 (Attachment B)
2026-04-27 · pass · 0-0
Refer Senate Bill 26-174, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-04-27 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (7)
- John Carson: no
- Lindsey Daugherty: yes
- Nick Hinrichsen: excused
- Katie Wallace: yes
- Lynda Zamora Wilson: no
- Dylan Roberts: yes
- Mike Weissman: yes
Refer Senate Bill 26-174 to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-05-05 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (11)
- Jennifer Bacon: yes
- Chad Clifford: excused
- Cecelia Espenoza: yes
- Ava Flanell: yes
- Lorena Garcia: yes
- Scott Slaugh: yes
- Matt Soper: yes
- Yara Zokaie: yes
- Michael Carter: yes
- Javier Mabrey: yes
- Rebecca Keltie: yes
BILL
2026-05-07 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: yes
- Barron: yes
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: no
- Bradfield: yes
- Bradley: no
- Brooks: no
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: yes
- Camacho: yes
- Carter: yes
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: no
- Duran: yes
- English: yes
- Espenoza: yes
- Feret: excused
- Flanell: yes
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: no
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: yes
- Gonzalez R.: yes
- Hamrick: yes
- Hartsook: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Johnson: no
- Joseph: yes
- Keltie: yes
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: no
- Lukens: yes
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: yes
- McCormick: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Richardson: no
- Ricks: yes
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: no
- Smith: yes
- Soper: yes
- Stewart K.: yes
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: no
- Taggart: yes
- Titone: yes
- Valdez: yes
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: no
- Willford: yes
- Winter T.: no
- Woodrow: yes
- Woog: no
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-08-21T21:01:01.173542Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=SB 174. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.