Bill Commons

CO SB 174

enacted

Prohibit Lead Generation Legal Marketing

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CO SB 174 pass?

Yes. CO SB 174 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-04-21): Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

What is CO SB 174 about?

The act establishes that the practice of lead generation marketing for legal services is a deceptive trade practice that is subject to enforcement under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act'.     'Lead generation legal marketing' is defined in the act as a form of marketing in which a lawyer, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional pays money or other compensation to a third party to receive information about a potential client or case, including the potential client's contact information or information about the potential client's legal issue or case.     Unless a person meets certain criteria, the act prohibits a person from paying money or other compensation for lead generation legal marketing services, engaging in the practice of lead generation legal marketing, or selling leads to an attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional.     A person may solicit or market for legal services in Colorado only if the person is:Authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado;Working on behalf of a person authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado and that person is clearly identified in any advertisement, marketing materials, information, or resources; orA nonprofit organization that engages in legal services.     The act establishes that a person that engages in the practice of lead generation legal marketing may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Who sponsors CO SB 174?

L. García, M. Soper, M. Carter and 1 others are the primary sponsors of CO SB 174, joined by 18 cosponsors.

Description

The act establishes that the practice of lead generation marketing for legal services is a deceptive trade practice that is subject to enforcement under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act'.     'Lead generation legal marketing' is defined in the act as a form of marketing in which a lawyer, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional pays money or other compensation to a third party to receive information about a potential client or case, including the potential client's contact information or information about the potential client's legal issue or case.     Unless a person meets certain criteria, the act prohibits a person from paying money or other compensation for lead generation legal marketing services, engaging in the practice of lead generation legal marketing, or selling leads to an attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional.     A person may solicit or market for legal services in Colorado only if the person is:Authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado;Working on behalf of a person authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado and that person is clearly identified in any advertisement, marketing materials, information, or resources; orA nonprofit organization that engages in legal services.     The act establishes that a person that engages in the practice of lead generation legal marketing may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Introduced
2026-04-21
Latest action
2026-04-21 — Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • L. Garcíasponsor
  • M. Sopersponsor
  • M. Cartersponsor
  • D. Robertssponsor
  • M. Lindsaycosponsor
  • E. Hamrickcosponsor
  • C. Cliffordcosponsor
  • K. Wallacecosponsor
  • M. Snydercosponsor
  • R. Rodriguezcosponsor
  • C. Kippcosponsor
  • M. Rutinelcosponsor
  • L. Daughertycosponsor
  • L. Cuttercosponsor
  • J. Colemancosponsor
  • J. Bridgescosponsor
  • A. Benavidezcosponsor
  • M. Ballcosponsor
  • T. Exumcosponsor
  • J. Phillipscosponsor
  • K. Nguyencosponsor
  • J. Mabreycosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-03

    Governor Signed

    executive-signature

  2. 2026-05-27

    Sent to the Governor

    executive-receipt

  3. 2026-05-26

    Signed by the President of the Senate

    passage

  4. 2026-05-26

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

    passage

  5. 2026-05-07

    House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

    passage,reading-3

  6. 2026-05-06

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  7. 2026-05-05

    House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

    committee-passage,referral-committee

  8. 2026-04-30

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

    passage,reading-3

  9. 2026-04-30

    Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

    introduction

  10. 2026-04-29

    Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

  11. 2026-04-27

    Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

    committee-passage,referral-committee

  12. 2026-04-21

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

    introduction

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment A)

    2026-04-27 · pass · 0-0

  • Adopt amendment L.003 (Attachment B)

    2026-04-27 · pass · 0-0

  • Refer Senate Bill 26-174, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.

    2026-04-27 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • John Carson: no
    • Lindsey Daugherty: yes
    • Nick Hinrichsen: excused
    • Katie Wallace: yes
    • Lynda Zamora Wilson: no
    • Dylan Roberts: yes
    • Mike Weissman: yes
  • Refer Senate Bill 26-174 to the Committee of the Whole.

    2026-05-05 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Jennifer Bacon: yes
    • Chad Clifford: excused
    • Cecelia Espenoza: yes
    • Ava Flanell: yes
    • Lorena Garcia: yes
    • Scott Slaugh: yes
    • Matt Soper: yes
    • Yara Zokaie: yes
    • Michael Carter: yes
    • Javier Mabrey: yes
    • Rebecca Keltie: yes
  • BILL

    2026-05-07 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (65)
    • Bacon: yes
    • Barron: yes
    • Boesenecker: yes
    • Bottoms: no
    • Bradfield: yes
    • Bradley: no
    • Brooks: no
    • Brown: yes
    • Caldwell: yes
    • Camacho: yes
    • Carter: yes
    • Clifford: yes
    • DeGraaf: no
    • Duran: yes
    • English: yes
    • Espenoza: yes
    • Feret: excused
    • Flanell: yes
    • Froelich: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Garcia Sander: no
    • Gilchrist: yes
    • Goldstein: yes
    • Gonzalez R.: yes
    • Hamrick: yes
    • Hartsook: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Johnson: no
    • Joseph: yes
    • Keltie: yes
    • Lieder: yes
    • Lindsay: yes
    • Luck: no
    • Lukens: yes
    • Mabrey: yes
    • Marshall: yes
    • Martinez: yes
    • Mauro: yes
    • McCormick: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Paschal: yes
    • Phillips: yes
    • Richardson: no
    • Ricks: yes
    • Rutinel: yes
    • Rydin: yes
    • Sirota: yes
    • Slaugh: no
    • Smith: yes
    • Soper: yes
    • Stewart K.: yes
    • Stewart R.: yes
    • Story: yes
    • Suckla: no
    • Taggart: yes
    • Titone: yes
    • Valdez: yes
    • Velasco: yes
    • Weinberg: no
    • Willford: yes
    • Winter T.: no
    • Woodrow: yes
    • Woog: no
    • Zokaie: yes
    • McCluskie: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-08-21T21:01:01.173542Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=SB 174. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.