Bill Commons

CO SB 169

enacted

Revisor's Bill

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CO SB 169 pass?

Yes. CO SB 169 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-06-02): Governor Signed

What is CO SB 169 about?

To improve the clarity and certainty of the statutes, the bill amends, repeals, and reconstructs various statutory provisions of law that are obsolete, imperfect, or inoperative. The specific reasons for each amendment or repeal are set forth in the appendix to the bill. The amendments made by the bill are not intended to change the meaning or intent of the statutes.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Who sponsors CO SB 169?

S. Woodrow, M. Soper, M. Weissman and 5 others are the primary sponsors of CO SB 169, joined by 13 cosponsors.

Description

To improve the clarity and certainty of the statutes, the bill amends, repeals, and reconstructs various statutory provisions of law that are obsolete, imperfect, or inoperative. The specific reasons for each amendment or repeal are set forth in the appendix to the bill. The amendments made by the bill are not intended to change the meaning or intent of the statutes.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Introduced
2026-04-17
Latest action
2026-06-02 — Governor Signed
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • S. Woodrowsponsor
  • M. Sopersponsor
  • M. Weissmansponsor
  • L. Frizellsponsor
  • S. Lucksponsor
  • S. Camachosponsor
  • D. Robertssponsor
  • J. Carsonsponsor
  • B. Kirkmeyercosponsor
  • J. Colemancosponsor
  • R. Weinbergcosponsor
  • S. Brightcosponsor
  • J. Bridgescosponsor
  • M. Catlincosponsor
  • N. Rickscosponsor
  • K. Nguyencosponsor
  • L. Goldsteincosponsor
  • K. DeGraafcosponsor
  • J. Caldwellcosponsor
  • C. Barroncosponsor
  • J. Baconcosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-02

    Governor Signed

    executive-signature

  2. 2026-05-22

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

    passage

  3. 2026-05-22

    Sent to the Governor

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-05-22

    Signed by the President of the Senate

    passage

  5. 2026-05-13

    House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

    passage,reading-3

  6. 2026-05-13

    Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass

  7. 2026-05-12

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

  8. 2026-05-07

    House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  9. 2026-05-05

    House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

    committee-passage,referral-committee

  10. 2026-04-27

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

    passage,reading-3

  11. 2026-04-27

    Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

    introduction

  12. 2026-04-24

    Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

    reading-2

  13. 2026-04-22

    Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole

    committee-passage

  14. 2026-04-17

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

    introduction

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Refer Senate Bill 26-169 to the Committee of the Whole and with a recommendation that it be placed on the consent calendar.

    2026-04-22 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • John Carson: yes
    • Lindsey Daugherty: yes
    • Nick Hinrichsen: yes
    • Katie Wallace: yes
    • Lynda Zamora Wilson: yes
    • Dylan Roberts: yes
    • Mike Weissman: yes
  • Adopt amendment L.001 (Attachment C).

    2026-05-05 · pass · 0-0

  • Refer Senate Bill 26-169, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.

    2026-05-05 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Jennifer Bacon: yes
    • Chad Clifford: excused
    • Cecelia Espenoza: yes
    • Ava Flanell: yes
    • Lorena Garcia: yes
    • Rebecca Keltie: yes
    • Scott Slaugh: yes
    • Matt Soper: yes
    • Yara Zokaie: excused
    • Michael Carter: yes
    • Javier Mabrey: yes
  • BILL

    2026-05-13 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (65)
    • Bacon: yes
    • Barron: yes
    • Boesenecker: yes
    • Bottoms: yes
    • Bradfield: yes
    • Bradley: yes
    • Brooks: yes
    • Brown: yes
    • Caldwell: yes
    • Camacho: yes
    • Carter: yes
    • Clifford: yes
    • DeGraaf: yes
    • Duran: yes
    • English: yes
    • Espenoza: yes
    • Feret: yes
    • Flanell: yes
    • Froelich: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Garcia Sander: yes
    • Gilchrist: yes
    • Goldstein: yes
    • Gonzalez R.: yes
    • Hamrick: yes
    • Hartsook: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Joseph: yes
    • Keltie: yes
    • Lieder: yes
    • Lindsay: yes
    • Luck: yes
    • Lukens: yes
    • Mabrey: yes
    • Marshall: yes
    • Martinez: yes
    • Mauro: yes
    • McCormick: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Paschal: yes
    • Phillips: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Ricks: yes
    • Rutinel: yes
    • Rydin: yes
    • Sirota: yes
    • Slaugh: yes
    • Smith: yes
    • Soper: yes
    • Stewart K.: yes
    • Stewart R.: yes
    • Story: yes
    • Suckla: yes
    • Taggart: yes
    • Titone: yes
    • Valdez: yes
    • Velasco: yes
    • Weinberg: yes
    • Willford: yes
    • Winter T.: yes
    • Woodrow: yes
    • Woog: yes
    • Zokaie: yes
    • McCluskie: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-10T12:58:18.203161Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=SB 169. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.