CO SB 11
enactedSearch Warrants Provided to Covered Platforms
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO SB 11 pass?
Yes. CO SB 11 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-01-14): Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
What is CO SB 11 about?
The act requires operators of certain websites, online services, online applications, or mobile applications (covered platforms) to ensure that each covered platform provides a streamlined process to allow Colorado law enforcement agencies to contact the covered platform at all times. The process must, at a minimum, make available a staffed hotline for Colorado law enforcement agencies for the purposes of:Receiving and responding to questions about search warrants;Acknowledging the receipt of a search warrant within 8 hours after receipt; andProviding status updates on search warrant compliance to a requesting Colorado law enforcement agency. An operator must comply with a search warrant within 72 hours after receiving the search warrant if certain conditions apply. A court may reasonably extend this time if the court makes a written finding that the operator or covered platform has shown good cause for the extension and that an extension would not cause an adverse result. The failure of an operator or a covered platform to comply with the requirements of a court-ordered search warrant supports a finding of contempt of court. The attorney general or a district attorney with jurisdiction may enforce the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors CO SB 11?
D. Roberts, L. Frizell, J. Rich and 7 others are the primary sponsors of CO SB 11, joined by 30 cosponsors.
Description
The act requires operators of certain websites, online services, online applications, or mobile applications (covered platforms) to ensure that each covered platform provides a streamlined process to allow Colorado law enforcement agencies to contact the covered platform at all times. The process must, at a minimum, make available a staffed hotline for Colorado law enforcement agencies for the purposes of:Receiving and responding to questions about search warrants;Acknowledging the receipt of a search warrant within 8 hours after receipt; andProviding status updates on search warrant compliance to a requesting Colorado law enforcement agency. An operator must comply with a search warrant within 72 hours after receiving the search warrant if certain conditions apply. A court may reasonably extend this time if the court makes a written finding that the operator or covered platform has shown good cause for the extension and that an extension would not cause an adverse result. The failure of an operator or a covered platform to comply with the requirements of a court-ordered search warrant supports a finding of contempt of court. The attorney general or a district attorney with jurisdiction may enforce the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Introduced
- 2026-01-14
- Latest action
- 2026-01-14 — Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- D. Robertssponsor
- L. Frizellsponsor
- J. Richsponsor
- R. Peltonsponsor
- B. Peltonsponsor
- L. Listonsponsor
- M. Catlinsponsor
- J. Carsonsponsor
- J. Caldwellsponsor
- A. Boeseneckersponsor
- W. Lindstedtcosponsor
- C. Kolkercosponsor
- B. Kirkmeyercosponsor
- C. Kippcosponsor
- I. Jodehcosponsor
- J. Gonzalescosponsor
- T. Exumcosponsor
- L. Cuttercosponsor
- J. Colemancosponsor
- J. Bridgescosponsor
- M. Ballcosponsor
- J. Amabilecosponsor
- S. Woodrowcosponsor
- M. Rutinelcosponsor
- K. Nguyencosponsor
- J. McCluskiecosponsor
- B. Marshallcosponsor
- M. Lindsaycosponsor
- E. Hamrickcosponsor
- C. Espenozacosponsor
- M. Froelichcosponsor
- M. Durancosponsor
- C. Cliffordcosponsor
- J. Baconcosponsor
- M. Weissmancosponsor
- K. Wallacecosponsor
- M. Snydercosponsor
- C. Simpsoncosponsor
- K. Mullicacosponsor
- J. Marchmancosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-30
Governor Signed
executive-signature
2026-03-20
Signed by the President of the Senate
passage
2026-03-20
Signed by the Speaker of the House
passage
2026-03-20
Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt
2026-03-18
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
2026-03-16
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-13
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Floor
2026-03-10
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-02-18
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-02-18
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
introduction
2026-02-17
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
reading-2
2026-02-11
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
committee-passage
2026-01-14
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Refer Senate Bill 26-011, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole and with a recommendation that it be placed on the consent calendar.
2026-02-11 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (7)
- John Carson: yes
- Lisa Frizell: yes
- Nick Hinrichsen: yes
- Marc Snyder: yes
- Katie Wallace: yes
- Dylan Roberts: yes
- Mike Weissman: yes
Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment C)
2026-02-11 · pass · 0-0
Adopt amendment L.005 (Attachment F)
2026-02-11 · pass · 0-0
Adopt amendment L.004 (Attachment E)
2026-02-11 · pass · 0-0
Adopt amendment L.003 (Attachment D)
2026-02-11 · pass · 0-0
BILL
2026-02-18 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (36)
- Amabile: yes
- Baisley: no
- Ball: yes
- Bridges: yes
- Bright: yes
- Carson: yes
- Catlin: yes
- Cutter: yes
- Danielson: yes
- Daugherty: excused
- District 21: other
- Exum: yes
- Frizell: yes
- Gonzales J.: yes
- Hinrichsen: yes
- Jodeh: yes
- Kipp: yes
- Kirkmeyer: yes
- Kolker: yes
- Lindstedt: yes
- Liston: yes
- Marchman: yes
- Mullica: yes
- Pelton B.: yes
- Pelton R.: yes
- Rich: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Snyder: yes
- Sullivan: yes
- Wallace: yes
- Weissman: yes
- Zamora Wilson: no
- Coleman: yes
- President: yes
Refer Senate Bill 26-011 to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-03-10 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (11)
- Jennifer Bacon: yes
- Chad Clifford: yes
- Cecelia Espenoza: yes
- Ava Flanell: yes
- Lorena Garcia: yes
- Rebecca Keltie: yes
- Scott Slaugh: yes
- Matt Soper: yes
- Yara Zokaie: yes
- Michael Carter: yes
- Javier Mabrey: yes
REPASS
2026-03-18 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (36)
- Amabile: yes
- Baisley: no
- Ball: yes
- Benavidez: yes
- Bridges: yes
- Bright: yes
- Carson: yes
- Catlin: yes
- Cutter: yes
- Danielson: excused
- Daugherty: yes
- Exum: yes
- Frizell: yes
- Gonzales J.: yes
- Hinrichsen: yes
- Jodeh: yes
- Kipp: yes
- Kirkmeyer: yes
- Kolker: yes
- Lindstedt: yes
- Liston: yes
- Marchman: yes
- Mullica: yes
- Pelton B.: yes
- Pelton R.: yes
- Rich: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Snyder: yes
- Sullivan: yes
- Wallace: yes
- Weissman: yes
- Zamora Wilson: no
- Coleman: yes
- President: yes
CONCUR
2026-03-18 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (36)
- Amabile: yes
- Baisley: yes
- Ball: yes
- Benavidez: yes
- Bridges: yes
- Bright: yes
- Carson: yes
- Catlin: yes
- Cutter: yes
- Danielson: excused
- Daugherty: yes
- Exum: yes
- Frizell: yes
- Gonzales J.: yes
- Hinrichsen: yes
- Jodeh: yes
- Kipp: yes
- Kirkmeyer: yes
- Kolker: yes
- Lindstedt: yes
- Liston: yes
- Marchman: yes
- Mullica: yes
- Pelton B.: yes
- Pelton R.: yes
- Rich: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Snyder: yes
- Sullivan: yes
- Wallace: yes
- Weissman: yes
- Zamora Wilson: yes
- Coleman: yes
- President: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-08-08T01:57:41.193191Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=SB 11. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.