CO HB 1258
died on adjournmentChanges to Practices Relating to Death
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO HB 1258 pass?
No. CO HB 1258 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-05-04): House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Not Concur - Request Conference Committee
What is CO HB 1258 about?
The bill makes changes to death-care related practices, including changes to:The practices of professionals licensed and establishments registered pursuant to the 'Mortuary Science Code';The licensure options for professionals seeking licensure pursuant to the 'Mortuary Science Code';The powers and duties of the director of the division of professions and occupations in connection with regulating professionals licensed and establishments registered pursuant to the 'Mortuary Science Code';The provisions concerning nontransplant tissue banks and the discipline of a person that has an interest in a nontransplant tissue bank;The abuse of a corpse as a criminal offense in regard to transporting human remains ;The timeline for regulatory review of certain death-care related entities and provisions; andThe process by which a licensed individual initiates, completes, responds to, or files a death certificate.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Who sponsors CO HB 1258?
D. Roberts, R. Pelton, B. Titone and 1 others are the primary sponsors of CO HB 1258, joined by 24 cosponsors.
Description
The bill makes changes to death-care related practices, including changes to:The practices of professionals licensed and establishments registered pursuant to the 'Mortuary Science Code';The licensure options for professionals seeking licensure pursuant to the 'Mortuary Science Code';The powers and duties of the director of the division of professions and occupations in connection with regulating professionals licensed and establishments registered pursuant to the 'Mortuary Science Code';The provisions concerning nontransplant tissue banks and the discipline of a person that has an interest in a nontransplant tissue bank;The abuse of a corpse as a criminal offense in regard to transporting human remains ;The timeline for regulatory review of certain death-care related entities and provisions; andThe process by which a licensed individual initiates, completes, responds to, or files a death certificate.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Introduced
- 2026-02-19
- Latest action
- 2026-05-04 — House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Not Concur - Request Conference Committee
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- D. Robertssponsor
- R. Peltonsponsor
- B. Titonesponsor
- M. Sopersponsor
- L. Listoncosponsor
- B. Kirkmeyercosponsor
- C. Kippcosponsor
- N. Hinrichsencosponsor
- J. Gonzalescosponsor
- J. Danielsoncosponsor
- J. Colemancosponsor
- J. Bridgescosponsor
- M. Ballcosponsor
- K. Nguyencosponsor
- K. Wallacecosponsor
- B. Marshallcosponsor
- M. Lindsaycosponsor
- S. Liedercosponsor
- R. Keltiecosponsor
- E. Hamrickcosponsor
- L. Garcíacosponsor
- C. Espenozacosponsor
- M. Durancosponsor
- A. Boeseneckercosponsor
- J. McCluskiecosponsor
- R. Rodriguezcosponsor
- B. Peltoncosponsor
- J. Marchmancosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-04
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Not Concur - Request Conference Committee
2026-05-01
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
2026-04-30
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-04-29
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
2026-04-28
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-03-31
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended to Appropriations
referral-committee
2026-03-16
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
introduction
2026-03-11
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-10
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
2026-03-05
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-03-04
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed
2026-02-19
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Refer House Bill 26-1258, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-03-05 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Max Brooks: yes
- Regina English: yes
- Lorena Garcia: yes
- Ryan Gonzalez: yes
- Rebecca Keltie: yes
- Sheila Lieder: yes
- Bob Marshall: yes
- Tisha Mauro: yes
- Chris Richardson: excused
- Gretchen Rydin: yes
- Larry Don Suckla: yes
- Sean Camacho: yes
- Naquetta Ricks: yes
Adopt amendment L.001
2026-03-05 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (3)
- Regina English: excused
- Chris Richardson: excused
- Sean Camacho: excused
Adopt amendment L.002
2026-03-05 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (2)
- Chris Richardson: excused
- Sean Camacho: excused
Adopt amendment L.003
2026-03-05 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (2)
- Chris Richardson: excused
- Sean Camacho: excused
AMD (H.002)
2026-03-10 · fail · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: no
- Barron: no
- Boesenecker: no
- Bottoms: no
- Bradfield: no
- Bradley: no
- Brooks: no
- Brown: excused
- Caldwell: no
- Camacho: no
- Carter: no
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: yes
- Duran: no
- English: excused
- Espenoza: no
- Feret: no
- Flanell: no
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: no
- Gilchrist: no
- Goldstein: no
- Gonzalez R.: no
- Hamrick: no
- Hartsook: no
- Jackson: no
- Johnson: no
- Joseph: no
- Keltie: no
- Lieder: no
- Lindsay: no
- Luck: no
- Lukens: no
- Mabrey: no
- Marshall: no
- Martinez: no
- Mauro: no
- McCormick: no
- Nguyen: no
- Paschal: no
- Phillips: no
- Richardson: no
- Ricks: no
- Rutinel: no
- Rydin: no
- Sirota: excused
- Slaugh: no
- Smith: no
- Soper: no
- Stewart K.: no
- Stewart R.: no
- Story: no
- Suckla: yes
- Taggart: excused
- Titone: no
- Valdez: excused
- Velasco: excused
- Weinberg: excused
- Willford: no
- Winter T.: no
- Woodrow: yes
- Woog: no
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: excused
BILL
2026-03-11 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: yes
- Barron: yes
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: yes
- Bradfield: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: yes
- Camacho: yes
- Carter: yes
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: yes
- Duran: yes
- English: yes
- Espenoza: yes
- Feret: yes
- Flanell: yes
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: yes
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: yes
- Gonzalez R.: yes
- Hamrick: yes
- Hartsook: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Joseph: yes
- Keltie: yes
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: yes
- Lukens: yes
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: yes
- McCormick: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Ricks: yes
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: yes
- Smith: yes
- Soper: yes
- Stewart K.: yes
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: yes
- Taggart: yes
- Titone: yes
- Valdez: yes
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: yes
- Willford: yes
- Winter T.: excused
- Woodrow: yes
- Woog: yes
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
Refer House Bill 26-1258, as amended, to the Committee on Appropriations.
2026-03-31 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (5)
- Iman Jodeh: yes
- Larry Liston: yes
- Rod Pelton: yes
- Nick Hinrichsen: yes
- Jessie Danielson: yes
Adopt amendment L.009
2026-03-31 · pass · 0-0
Refer House Bill 26-1258, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-04-28 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Julie Gonzales: yes
- Barbara Kirkmeyer: yes
- Chris Kolker: yes
- Larry Liston: yes
- Byron Pelton: yes
- Jeff Bridges: yes
- Judy Amabile: yes
Adopt amendment L.011
2026-04-28 · pass · 0-0
NOT CNCR
2026-05-04 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: excused
- Barron: no
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: yes
- Bradfield: yes
- Bradley: yes
- Brooks: yes
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: yes
- Camacho: yes
- Carter: yes
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: yes
- Duran: yes
- English: yes
- Espenoza: yes
- Feret: yes
- Flanell: yes
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: yes
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: yes
- Gonzalez R.: yes
- Hamrick: yes
- Hartsook: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Joseph: yes
- Keltie: yes
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: yes
- Lukens: yes
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: yes
- McCormick: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Ricks: yes
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: yes
- Smith: yes
- Soper: yes
- Stewart K.: yes
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: yes
- Taggart: yes
- Titone: yes
- Valdez: yes
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: no
- Willford: yes
- Winter T.: excused
- Woodrow: yes
- Woog: yes
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T03:52:26.466301Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=HB 1258. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.