CO HB 1135
enactedTransparency of Chemicals Used in Hair Products
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO HB 1135 pass?
Yes. CO HB 1135 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-05-29): Governor Signed
What is CO HB 1135 about?
On and after July 1, 2027, a manufacturer of a hair relaxer product or a hairpiece product (covered hair product) is prohibited from selling or distributing a covered hair product in the state that contains an intentionally added carcinogen or reproductive toxicant unless the covered hair product has a warning label that notifies the consumer that the covered hair product contains an intentionally added carcinogen or reproductive toxicant, which warning label must comply with certain requirements depending on whether the covered hair product contains an intentionally added carcinogen, an intentionally added reproductive toxicant, or both (warning label requirement). The warning label requirement does not apply to a covered hair product that is sold or distributed to a commercial entity for professional use. On and after July 1, 2028, the attorney general may adopt rules updating the warning label requirement. A violation of the warning label requirement constitutes a deceptive trade practice.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors CO HB 1135?
J. Marchman, A. Benavidez, J. Joseph and 1 others are the primary sponsors of CO HB 1135, joined by 27 cosponsors.
Description
On and after July 1, 2027, a manufacturer of a hair relaxer product or a hairpiece product (covered hair product) is prohibited from selling or distributing a covered hair product in the state that contains an intentionally added carcinogen or reproductive toxicant unless the covered hair product has a warning label that notifies the consumer that the covered hair product contains an intentionally added carcinogen or reproductive toxicant, which warning label must comply with certain requirements depending on whether the covered hair product contains an intentionally added carcinogen, an intentionally added reproductive toxicant, or both (warning label requirement). The warning label requirement does not apply to a covered hair product that is sold or distributed to a commercial entity for professional use. On and after July 1, 2028, the attorney general may adopt rules updating the warning label requirement. A violation of the warning label requirement constitutes a deceptive trade practice.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Introduced
- 2026-02-04
- Latest action
- 2026-05-29 — Governor Signed
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- J. Marchmansponsor
- A. Benavidezsponsor
- J. Josephsponsor
- R. Englishsponsor
- C. Kippcosponsor
- I. Jodehcosponsor
- N. Hinrichsencosponsor
- T. Exumcosponsor
- J. Danielsoncosponsor
- L. Cuttercosponsor
- J. Colemancosponsor
- J. Amabilecosponsor
- A. Valdezcosponsor
- E. Sirotacosponsor
- M. Rutinelcosponsor
- M. Weissmancosponsor
- J. Phillipscosponsor
- K. Nguyencosponsor
- J. Mabreycosponsor
- M. Lindsaycosponsor
- S. Liedercosponsor
- J. Jacksoncosponsor
- L. Goldsteincosponsor
- M. Durancosponsor
- M. Cartercosponsor
- K. Browncosponsor
- J. Baconcosponsor
- N. Rickscosponsor
- M. Snydercosponsor
- R. Rodriguezcosponsor
- C. Kolkercosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-29
Governor Signed
executive-signature
2026-05-12
Signed by the Speaker of the House
passage
2026-05-12
Signed by the President of the Senate
passage
2026-05-12
Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt
2026-04-14
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
2026-04-08
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
2026-04-07
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-04-06
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
reading-2
2026-03-31
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
committee-passage
2026-03-06
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
introduction
2026-03-03
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-02
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
2026-02-26
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-02-04
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Adopt amendment L.002
2026-02-26 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (2)
- Brandi Bradley: excused
- Sean Camacho: excused
Refer House Bill 26-1135, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-02-26 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Brandi Bradley: yes
- Max Brooks: no
- Regina English: yes
- Rebecca Keltie: yes
- Sheila Lieder: yes
- Javier Mabrey: yes
- Bob Marshall: yes
- Tisha Mauro: yes
- Chris Richardson: yes
- Larry Don Suckla: yes
- Yara Zokaie: yes
- Sean Camacho: excused
- Naquetta Ricks: yes
Adopt amendment L.001
2026-02-26 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (2)
- Brandi Bradley: excused
- Sean Camacho: excused
BILL
2026-03-03 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: yes
- Barron: no
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: no
- Bradfield: no
- Bradley: excused
- Brooks: no
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: no
- Camacho: yes
- Carter: yes
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: no
- Duran: yes
- English: yes
- Espenoza: yes
- Feret: yes
- Flanell: no
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: no
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: yes
- Gonzalez R.: no
- Hamrick: yes
- Hartsook: no
- Jackson: yes
- Johnson: no
- Joseph: yes
- Keltie: yes
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: no
- Lukens: yes
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: yes
- McCormick: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Richardson: no
- Ricks: excused
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: no
- Smith: yes
- Soper: no
- Stewart K.: yes
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: no
- Taggart: no
- Titone: yes
- Valdez: excused
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: no
- Willford: yes
- Winter T.: no
- Woodrow: yes
- Woog: no
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
Adopt amendment L.004
2026-03-31 · pass · 0-0
Adopt amendment L.003
2026-03-31 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (1)
- Iman Jodeh: excused
Refer House Bill 26-1135, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole and with a recommendation that it be placed on the consent calendar.
2026-03-31 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (5)
- Iman Jodeh: yes
- Larry Liston: yes
- Rod Pelton: yes
- Nick Hinrichsen: yes
- Jessie Danielson: yes
REPASS
2026-04-14 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: yes
- Barron: no
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: no
- Bradfield: no
- Bradley: no
- Brooks: no
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: no
- Camacho: yes
- Carter: yes
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: no
- Duran: yes
- English: yes
- Espenoza: yes
- Feret: yes
- Flanell: no
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: excused
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: yes
- Gonzalez R.: no
- Hamrick: yes
- Hartsook: no
- Jackson: yes
- Johnson: no
- Joseph: yes
- Keltie: yes
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: no
- Lukens: yes
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: yes
- McCormick: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Ricks: yes
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: no
- Smith: yes
- Soper: no
- Stewart K.: yes
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: no
- Taggart: no
- Titone: yes
- Valdez: yes
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: no
- Willford: yes
- Winter T.: no
- Woodrow: excused
- Woog: no
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
CONCUR
2026-04-14 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (65)
- Bacon: yes
- Barron: no
- Boesenecker: yes
- Bottoms: no
- Bradfield: yes
- Bradley: no
- Brooks: yes
- Brown: yes
- Caldwell: no
- Camacho: yes
- Carter: yes
- Clifford: yes
- DeGraaf: no
- Duran: yes
- English: yes
- Espenoza: yes
- Feret: yes
- Flanell: no
- Froelich: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Garcia Sander: excused
- Gilchrist: yes
- Goldstein: yes
- Gonzalez R.: no
- Hamrick: yes
- Hartsook: no
- Jackson: yes
- Johnson: no
- Joseph: yes
- Keltie: no
- Lieder: yes
- Lindsay: yes
- Luck: no
- Lukens: yes
- Mabrey: yes
- Marshall: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Mauro: yes
- McCormick: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Paschal: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Ricks: yes
- Rutinel: yes
- Rydin: yes
- Sirota: yes
- Slaugh: no
- Smith: yes
- Soper: no
- Stewart K.: yes
- Stewart R.: yes
- Story: yes
- Suckla: no
- Taggart: no
- Titone: yes
- Valdez: yes
- Velasco: yes
- Weinberg: no
- Willford: yes
- Winter T.: no
- Woodrow: excused
- Woog: no
- Zokaie: yes
- McCluskie: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T03:52:26.466301Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=HB 1135. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.