Bill Commons

CO HB 1023

enacted

Political Party Liability for Accessibility Requirements

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CO HB 1023 pass?

Yes. CO HB 1023 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-04-27): Governor Signed

What is CO HB 1023 about?

Under current law, a political party must ensure that any person, upon request, is able to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly with the use of a video conferencing platform or alternative means of participation. The failure of any political party to make a reasonable effort to comply with these accessibility requirements constitutes discrimination on the basis of disability in a place of public accommodation.     The act clarifies that only a person who is otherwise eligible pursuant to statute to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly may request video conferencing or another alternative means of participation. The act also clarifies that a person who is subjected to a violation of a political party's duties regarding these accessibility requirements may file suit only against the central committee of the political party holding the caucus or assembly. An individual, including a member of the central committee of the political party or a volunteer for a political party, may not be held liable for a violation of these accessibility requirements. Upon a finding of a violation of these accessibility requirements, a court may require compliance with the applicable accessibility requirement and either actual monetary damages or a statutory fine of $3,500 for each violation.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Who sponsors CO HB 1023?

L. Zamora Wilson, R. Rodriguez, M. Baisley and 2 others are the primary sponsors of CO HB 1023, joined by 36 cosponsors.

Description

Under current law, a political party must ensure that any person, upon request, is able to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly with the use of a video conferencing platform or alternative means of participation. The failure of any political party to make a reasonable effort to comply with these accessibility requirements constitutes discrimination on the basis of disability in a place of public accommodation.     The act clarifies that only a person who is otherwise eligible pursuant to statute to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly may request video conferencing or another alternative means of participation. The act also clarifies that a person who is subjected to a violation of a political party's duties regarding these accessibility requirements may file suit only against the central committee of the political party holding the caucus or assembly. An individual, including a member of the central committee of the political party or a volunteer for a political party, may not be held liable for a violation of these accessibility requirements. Upon a finding of a violation of these accessibility requirements, a court may require compliance with the applicable accessibility requirement and either actual monetary damages or a statutory fine of $3,500 for each violation.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Introduced
2026-01-14
Latest action
2026-04-27 — Governor Signed
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • L. Zamora Wilsonsponsor
  • R. Rodriguezsponsor
  • M. Baisleysponsor
  • S. Woodrowsponsor
  • S. Lucksponsor
  • C. Kippcosponsor
  • I. Jodehcosponsor
  • J. Gonzalescosponsor
  • L. Frizellcosponsor
  • T. Exumcosponsor
  • L. Daughertycosponsor
  • L. Cuttercosponsor
  • J. Colemancosponsor
  • J. Carsoncosponsor
  • A. Benavidezcosponsor
  • T. Wintercosponsor
  • R. Weinbergcosponsor
  • E. Velascocosponsor
  • R. Taggartcosponsor
  • L. Sucklacosponsor
  • T. Storycosponsor
  • S. Slaughcosponsor
  • C. Richardsoncosponsor
  • J. Phillipscosponsor
  • M. Martinezcosponsor
  • M. Lindsaycosponsor
  • A. Hartsookcosponsor
  • L. Goldsteincosponsor
  • C. Espenozacosponsor
  • M. Durancosponsor
  • K. DeGraafcosponsor
  • C. Cliffordcosponsor
  • J. Caldwellcosponsor
  • M. Brookscosponsor
  • B. Bradleycosponsor
  • K. Wallacecosponsor
  • S. Bottomscosponsor
  • R. Peltoncosponsor
  • K. Mullicacosponsor
  • J. Marchmancosponsor
  • C. Kolkercosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-04-27

    Governor Signed

    executive-signature

  2. 2026-04-16

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

    passage

  3. 2026-04-16

    Signed by the President of the Senate

    passage

  4. 2026-04-16

    Sent to the Governor

    executive-receipt

  5. 2026-04-01

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

    passage,reading-3

  6. 2026-03-31

    Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

    reading-2

  7. 2026-03-26

    Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole

    committee-passage

  8. 2026-03-04

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs

    introduction

  9. 2026-02-26

    House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

    passage,reading-3

  10. 2026-02-25

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  11. 2026-02-24

    House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  12. 2026-02-19

    House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

    committee-passage,referral-committee

  13. 2026-01-14

    Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs

    introduction

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Adopt amendment L.001 (Attachment C).

    2026-02-19 · pass · 0-0

  • Refer House Bill 26-1023, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.

    2026-02-19 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Scott Bottoms: yes
    • Brandi Bradley: yes
    • Michael Carter: yes
    • Cecelia Espenoza: yes
    • Lisa Feret: yes
    • Meg Froelich: no
    • Stephanie Luck: yes
    • Naquetta Ricks: yes
    • Chad Clifford: yes
    • Jenny Willford: yes
    • Kenny Nguyen: yes
  • Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment D).

    2026-02-19 · pass · 0-0

  • Refer House Bill 26-1023 to the Committee of the Whole and with a recommendation that it be placed on the consent calendar.

    2026-03-26 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (5)
    • William Lindstedt: yes
    • Rod Pelton: yes
    • Lynda Zamora Wilson: yes
    • Tom Sullivan: yes
    • Katie Wallace: yes
  • BILL

    2026-04-01 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (36)
    • Amabile: yes
    • Baisley: yes
    • Ball: yes
    • Benavidez: yes
    • Bridges: yes
    • Bright: yes
    • Carson: yes
    • Catlin: yes
    • Cutter: yes
    • Danielson: yes
    • Daugherty: yes
    • Exum: yes
    • Frizell: yes
    • Gonzales J.: yes
    • Hinrichsen: yes
    • Jodeh: yes
    • Kipp: yes
    • Kirkmeyer: yes
    • Kolker: yes
    • Lindstedt: yes
    • Liston: yes
    • Marchman: yes
    • Mullica: yes
    • Pelton B.: yes
    • Pelton R.: yes
    • Rich: yes
    • Roberts: yes
    • Rodriguez: yes
    • Simpson: yes
    • Snyder: yes
    • Sullivan: yes
    • Wallace: yes
    • Weissman: yes
    • Zamora Wilson: yes
    • Coleman: yes
    • President: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T03:52:26.466301Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=HB 1023. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.