Bill Commons

CO HB 1009

enacted

Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act

Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CO HB 1009 pass?

Yes. CO HB 1009 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-06-03): Governor Signed

What is CO HB 1009 about?

The act creates the 'Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act', which requires peace officers to conduct a lethality assessment when responding to a domestic violence incident and include the completed lethality assessment in the incident report. A peace officer is not required to administer a lethality assessment if a victim is unavailable, not at the scene, incapacitated, or if circumstances otherwise make the administration of the lethality assessment impossible or impracticable. If the lethality assessment indicates that an individual is a high-risk victim, or if the lethality assessment does not indicate a victim is high-risk but a peace officer determines an individual is a high-risk victim based on the totality of the circumstances, the peace officer is required to immediately contact a community-based victim's advocate either by phone or in person and provide the high-risk victim the opportunity to speak with the advocate.     The act requires the attorney general's office, in consultation with a Colorado-based coalition that advocates for survivors of domestic violence, to develop a mandatory training for peace officers to learn how to administer the lethality assessment and provide victim referrals. No later than June 1, 2027, the attorney general is required to make the training available and offer assistance to law enforcement agencies in providing the training. Beginning July 1, 2027, the act requires each law enforcement agency to ensure that each peace officer employed by the agency has completed the mandatory training; except that a law enforcement agency that has provided training on the administration of lethality assessments prior to July 1, 2027, is not required to provide additional training.     Beginning January 2028, and each January thereafter, the act requires the attorney general's office to report to the general assembly certain information related to lethality assessments conducted in the previous calendar year. No later than January 31, 2030, the domestic violence fatality review board shall evaluate the effectiveness of mandatory lethality assessments and referrals to resources and submit the evaluation to the general assembly.     The act does not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person for an act or omission made in good faith related to administering a lethality assessment.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Who sponsors CO HB 1009?

K. Wallace, B. Pelton, R. Gonzalez and 1 others are the primary sponsors of CO HB 1009, joined by 58 cosponsors.

Description

The act creates the 'Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act', which requires peace officers to conduct a lethality assessment when responding to a domestic violence incident and include the completed lethality assessment in the incident report. A peace officer is not required to administer a lethality assessment if a victim is unavailable, not at the scene, incapacitated, or if circumstances otherwise make the administration of the lethality assessment impossible or impracticable. If the lethality assessment indicates that an individual is a high-risk victim, or if the lethality assessment does not indicate a victim is high-risk but a peace officer determines an individual is a high-risk victim based on the totality of the circumstances, the peace officer is required to immediately contact a community-based victim's advocate either by phone or in person and provide the high-risk victim the opportunity to speak with the advocate.     The act requires the attorney general's office, in consultation with a Colorado-based coalition that advocates for survivors of domestic violence, to develop a mandatory training for peace officers to learn how to administer the lethality assessment and provide victim referrals. No later than June 1, 2027, the attorney general is required to make the training available and offer assistance to law enforcement agencies in providing the training. Beginning July 1, 2027, the act requires each law enforcement agency to ensure that each peace officer employed by the agency has completed the mandatory training; except that a law enforcement agency that has provided training on the administration of lethality assessments prior to July 1, 2027, is not required to provide additional training.     Beginning January 2028, and each January thereafter, the act requires the attorney general's office to report to the general assembly certain information related to lethality assessments conducted in the previous calendar year. No later than January 31, 2030, the domestic violence fatality review board shall evaluate the effectiveness of mandatory lethality assessments and referrals to resources and submit the evaluation to the general assembly.     The act does not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person for an act or omission made in good faith related to administering a lethality assessment.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Introduced
2026-01-14
Latest action
2026-06-03 — Governor Signed
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • K. Wallacesponsor
  • B. Peltonsponsor
  • R. Gonzalezsponsor
  • M. Duransponsor
  • K. Nguyencosponsor
  • K. McCormickcosponsor
  • J. McCluskiecosponsor
  • T. Maurocosponsor
  • B. Marshallcosponsor
  • J. Mabreycosponsor
  • M. Lukenscosponsor
  • M. Lindsaycosponsor
  • S. Liedercosponsor
  • R. Keltiecosponsor
  • J. Jacksoncosponsor
  • E. Hamrickcosponsor
  • L. Goldsteincosponsor
  • L. Garcíacosponsor
  • M. Froelichcosponsor
  • C. Cliffordcosponsor
  • S. Camachocosponsor
  • J. Caldwellcosponsor
  • K. Browncosponsor
  • M. Brookscosponsor
  • B. Bradleycosponsor
  • C. Barroncosponsor
  • M. Weissmancosponsor
  • T. Sullivancosponsor
  • M. Snydercosponsor
  • C. Simpsoncosponsor
  • R. Rodriguezcosponsor
  • D. Robertscosponsor
  • J. Richcosponsor
  • R. Peltoncosponsor
  • K. Mullicacosponsor
  • J. Marchmancosponsor
  • W. Lindstedtcosponsor
  • C. Kolkercosponsor
  • B. Kirkmeyercosponsor
  • C. Kippcosponsor
  • I. Jodehcosponsor
  • N. Hinrichsencosponsor
  • J. Gonzalescosponsor
  • L. Frizellcosponsor
  • T. Exumcosponsor
  • L. Daughertycosponsor
  • L. Cuttercosponsor
  • J. Colemancosponsor
  • J. Bridgescosponsor
  • A. Benavidezcosponsor
  • M. Ballcosponsor
  • J. Amabilecosponsor
  • T. Wintercosponsor
  • B. Titonecosponsor
  • T. Storycosponsor
  • R. Stewartcosponsor
  • K. Stewartcosponsor
  • E. Sirotacosponsor
  • L. Smithcosponsor
  • G. Rydincosponsor
  • M. Rutinelcosponsor
  • A. Paschalcosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-03

    Governor Signed

    executive-signature

  2. 2026-05-20

    Signed by the Speaker of the House

    passage

  3. 2026-05-20

    Signed by the President of the Senate

    passage

  4. 2026-05-20

    Sent to the Governor

    executive-receipt

  5. 2026-04-27

    Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

    passage,reading-3

  6. 2026-04-24

    Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

    committee-passage,referral-committee

  7. 2026-04-24

    Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  8. 2026-03-16

    Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations

    referral-committee

  9. 2026-03-12

    Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

    introduction

  10. 2026-03-09

    House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

    passage,reading-3

  11. 2026-03-06

    House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

    committee-passage,referral-committee

  12. 2026-03-06

    House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  13. 2026-02-18

    House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations

    referral-committee

  14. 2026-01-14

    Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

    introduction

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Refer House Bill 26-1009, as amended, to the Committee on Appropriations.

    2026-02-18 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Jennifer Bacon: yes
    • Chad Clifford: yes
    • Cecelia Espenoza: yes
    • Ava Flanell: yes
    • Lorena Garcia: yes
    • Rebecca Keltie: yes
    • Scott Slaugh: yes
    • Ty Winter: yes
    • Yara Zokaie: yes
    • Michael Carter: yes
    • Javier Mabrey: yes
  • Adopt amendment L.001 (Attachment A).

    2026-02-18 · pass · 0-0

  • Adopt amendment L.004 (Attachment J).

    2026-02-18 · pass · 0-0

  • Adopt amendment L.002 (Attachment B).

    2026-02-18 · pass · 0-0

  • Adopt amendment L.003 (Attachment C).

    2026-02-18 · pass · 0-0

  • Refer House Bill 26-1009 to the Committee of the Whole.

    2026-03-06 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Andrew Boesenecker: yes
    • Scott Bottoms: no
    • Junie Joseph: yes
    • Karen McCormick: yes
    • Matt Soper: excused
    • Rick Taggart: yes
    • Brianna Titone: yes
    • Elizabeth Velasco: yes
    • Yara Zokaie: yes
    • Emily Sirota: yes
    • Kyle Brown: yes
  • Refer House Bill 26-1009 to the Committee on Appropriations.

    2026-03-16 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • John Carson: yes
    • Lindsey Daugherty: yes
    • Nick Hinrichsen: yes
    • Katie Wallace: yes
    • Lynda Zamora Wilson: no
    • Dylan Roberts: yes
    • Mike Weissman: yes
  • Refer House Bill 26-1009 to the Committee of the Whole.

    2026-04-24 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Julie Gonzales: yes
    • Barbara Kirkmeyer: yes
    • Chris Kolker: yes
    • Larry Liston: yes
    • Byron Pelton: yes
    • Jeff Bridges: yes
    • Judy Amabile: yes
  • BILL

    2026-04-27 · pass · 0-0

    Member-level votes (36)
    • Amabile: yes
    • Baisley: no
    • Ball: yes
    • Benavidez: yes
    • Bridges: yes
    • Bright: yes
    • Carson: yes
    • Catlin: yes
    • Cutter: yes
    • Danielson: yes
    • Daugherty: yes
    • Exum: yes
    • Frizell: yes
    • Gonzales J.: yes
    • Hinrichsen: yes
    • Jodeh: yes
    • Kipp: yes
    • Kirkmeyer: yes
    • Kolker: yes
    • Lindstedt: yes
    • Liston: excused
    • Marchman: yes
    • Mullica: yes
    • Pelton B.: yes
    • Pelton R.: yes
    • Rich: yes
    • Roberts: yes
    • Rodriguez: yes
    • Simpson: yes
    • Snyder: yes
    • Sullivan: yes
    • Wallace: yes
    • Weissman: yes
    • Zamora Wilson: no
    • President: yes
    • Coleman: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T03:52:26.466301Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=HB 1009. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.