CA SCA 5
introducedA resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Section 16 to Article XIIIB thereof, and by amending Section 8 of, and adding Section 8.7 to, Article XVI thereof, relating to education finance.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SCA 5 pass?
Not yet. CA SCA 5 has been introduced but has not advanced to a vote. Latest recorded action (2026-08-11): In Assembly. Held at Desk.
What is CA SCA 5 about?
The Classroom Instructional Improvement and Accountability Act, an initiative approved by the voters as Proposition 98 at the November 8, 1988, statewide general election, amended the California Constitution to, among other things, set forth a formula for computing the minimum amount of revenues that the state is required to appropriate for the support of school districts and community college districts in any given fiscal year. The California Constitution creates the Public School System Stabilization Account in the General Fund and requires the Controller to transfer, pursuant to a schedule provided by the Director of Finance, a specified amount from the General Fund to the account in each fiscal year, except as provided. The California Constitution generally prohibits the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the state and each local government from exceeding the appropriations limit of the entity of government for the prior fiscal year, adjusted for the change in the cost of living and the change in population. The California Constitution defines "appropriations subject to limitation" for these purposes. Existing law establishes a public school financing system that requires state funding for county superintendents of schools, school districts, and charter schools to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula (LCFF) , as specified. Under existing law, school districts that do not receive an apportionment of state funds under the LCFF because their local revenues exceed the amount calculated pursuant to the LCFF are considered "basic aid school districts" or "excess tax entities." This measure would establish the Equalization Reserve Account in the General Fund. The measure would require the Controller, in any fiscal year in which there is an increase over the preceding fiscal year in the minimum amount of revenues the state is required to appropriate for the support of school districts and community college districts, to transfer from the General Fund to the Equalization Reserve Account an amount equal to the total amount transferred from the General Fund to the Public School System Stabilization Account in that fiscal year, as provided. The measure would require interest earned on funds in the Equalization Reserve Account to be deposited in the account and would require the Legislature, in each fiscal year, to allocate at least 80% of that interest to increase per-pupil funding in non-basic aid school districts. The measure would define non-basic aid school districts as school districts that received an apportionment of state funds under the LCFF in any of the preceding 3 fiscal years. The measure would authorize the Legislature to suspend the required transfers from the General Fund in any fiscal year in which average per-pupil funding in non-basic aid school districts equals or exceeds the average per-pupil funding in basic aid school districts. The measure would prohibit the allocation of funds transferred to the account from the General Fund. The measure would exclude funds transferred to or allocated from the account from computations of the minimum amount of revenues that the state is required to appropriate for the support of school districts and community college districts, from the moneys allocated for purposes of meeting that minimum funding obligation, and from the total annual state appropriations subject to the limitation described above.
Who sponsors CA SCA 5?
Cortese is the primary sponsor of CA SCA 5.
Description
The Classroom Instructional Improvement and Accountability Act, an initiative approved by the voters as Proposition 98 at the November 8, 1988, statewide general election, amended the California Constitution to, among other things, set forth a formula for computing the minimum amount of revenues that the state is required to appropriate for the support of school districts and community college districts in any given fiscal year. The California Constitution creates the Public School System Stabilization Account in the General Fund and requires the Controller to transfer, pursuant to a schedule provided by the Director of Finance, a specified amount from the General Fund to the account in each fiscal year, except as provided. The California Constitution generally prohibits the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the state and each local government from exceeding the appropriations limit of the entity of government for the prior fiscal year, adjusted for the change in the cost of living and the change in population. The California Constitution defines "appropriations subject to limitation" for these purposes. Existing law establishes a public school financing system that requires state funding for county superintendents of schools, school districts, and charter schools to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula (LCFF) , as specified. Under existing law, school districts that do not receive an apportionment of state funds under the LCFF because their local revenues exceed the amount calculated pursuant to the LCFF are considered "basic aid school districts" or "excess tax entities." This measure would establish the Equalization Reserve Account in the General Fund. The measure would require the Controller, in any fiscal year in which there is an increase over the preceding fiscal year in the minimum amount of revenues the state is required to appropriate for the support of school districts and community college districts, to transfer from the General Fund to the Equalization Reserve Account an amount equal to the total amount transferred from the General Fund to the Public School System Stabilization Account in that fiscal year, as provided. The measure would require interest earned on funds in the Equalization Reserve Account to be deposited in the account and would require the Legislature, in each fiscal year, to allocate at least 80% of that interest to increase per-pupil funding in non-basic aid school districts. The measure would define non-basic aid school districts as school districts that received an apportionment of state funds under the LCFF in any of the preceding 3 fiscal years. The measure would authorize the Legislature to suspend the required transfers from the General Fund in any fiscal year in which average per-pupil funding in non-basic aid school districts equals or exceeds the average per-pupil funding in basic aid school districts. The measure would prohibit the allocation of funds transferred to the account from the General Fund. The measure would exclude funds transferred to or allocated from the account from computations of the minimum amount of revenues that the state is required to appropriate for the support of school districts and community college districts, from the moneys allocated for purposes of meeting that minimum funding obligation, and from the total annual state appropriations subject to the limitation described above.
- Introduced
- 2026-05-07
- Latest action
- 2026-08-11 — In Assembly. Held at Desk.
- Bill type
- constitutional amendment
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Corteseauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-08-11
In Assembly. Held at Desk.
2026-08-10
Read. Adopted. (Ayes 27. Noes 9.) Ordered to the Assembly.
2026-08-10
Read. Adopted. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 5325.) Ordered to the Assembly.
amendment-passage,passage,reading-1
2026-06-16
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-06-15
From committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4761.) (June 15).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage
2026-06-15
From committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 15).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage
2026-06-10
Set for hearing June 15.
2026-06-09
From committee: Be adopted and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4643.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage,referral-committee
2026-06-09
From committee: Be adopted and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage,referral-committee
2026-06-04
From committee: Be adopted and re-refer to Com. on E. & C.A. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 4572.) (June 3). Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage,referral-committee
2026-05-29
Set for hearing June 9 in E. & C.A. pending receipt.
2026-05-26
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-05-21
Set for hearing June 3.
2026-05-20
Referred to Coms. on ED. and E. & C.A.
referral-committee
2026-05-07
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Be adopted, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Elections and Constitutional Amendments]
2026-06-03 · pass · 6-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Choi: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: other
Be adopted, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-06-09 · pass · 5-0
Member-level votes (5)
- Cervantes: yes
- Allen: yes
- Choi: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Umberg: yes
Be adopted
2026-06-15 · pass · 4-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Richardson: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Seyarto: other
- Dahle: other
- Cabaldon: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-29T21:07:59.383161Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SCA 5. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.