CA SB 992
enactedCounty auditors: special districts: annual audit exceptions.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 992 pass?
Yes. CA SB 992 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-08-27): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 150, Statutes of 2026.
What is CA SB 992 about?
Existing law requires a county auditor to make or contract with a certified public accountant or public accountant to make an annual audit of the accounts and records of every special district within the county for which an audit is not otherwise provided, as specified. Existing law authorizes a special district to replace this annual audit with a financial review, or, until January 1, 2027, an agreed-upon procedures engagement or an annual financial compilation of the special district, if specified conditions are met, including that the special district's annual revenues do not exceed $150,000. Until January 1, 2027, upon receipt of the financial review, agreed-upon procedures engagement, or financial compilation, existing law authorizes a county auditor to appoint a certified public accountant or a public accountant to conduct an audit of the special district, as specified. Existing law prohibits a special district from replacing the annual audit requirement with an annual financial compilation for more than 5 consecutive years, after which existing law requires the special district to use specified procedures. This bill would extend the January 1, 2027, repeal date referenced above to January 1, 2037, and would increase the revenue cap described above to $250,000. After replacing the annual audit requirement with an annual financial compilation for 5 years, the bill would authorize a special district with annual revenues of less than $50,000 to replace the annual audit with a financial review, as described above.
Who sponsors CA SB 992?
Niello is the primary sponsor of CA SB 992.
Description
Existing law requires a county auditor to make or contract with a certified public accountant or public accountant to make an annual audit of the accounts and records of every special district within the county for which an audit is not otherwise provided, as specified. Existing law authorizes a special district to replace this annual audit with a financial review, or, until January 1, 2027, an agreed-upon procedures engagement or an annual financial compilation of the special district, if specified conditions are met, including that the special district's annual revenues do not exceed $150,000. Until January 1, 2027, upon receipt of the financial review, agreed-upon procedures engagement, or financial compilation, existing law authorizes a county auditor to appoint a certified public accountant or a public accountant to conduct an audit of the special district, as specified. Existing law prohibits a special district from replacing the annual audit requirement with an annual financial compilation for more than 5 consecutive years, after which existing law requires the special district to use specified procedures. This bill would extend the January 1, 2027, repeal date referenced above to January 1, 2037, and would increase the revenue cap described above to $250,000. After replacing the annual audit requirement with an annual financial compilation for 5 years, the bill would authorize a special district with annual revenues of less than $50,000 to replace the annual audit with a financial review, as described above.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-05
- Latest action
- 2026-08-27 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 150, Statutes of 2026.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Nielloauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-08-27
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 150, Statutes of 2026.
became-law
2026-08-27
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2026-08-18
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
executive-receipt
2026-08-10
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-10
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-10
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5317.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-06
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-08-06
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
2026-08-06
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 6087.) Ordered to the Senate.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-08-03
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2026-07-02
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 1).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-06-23
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-06-17
June 17 hearing postponed by committee.
2026-06-01
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
referral-committee
2026-05-26
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1
2026-05-26
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4453.) Ordered to the Assembly.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-04-30
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-04-29
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4095.) (April 29).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-09
Set for hearing April 29.
2026-03-18
March 18 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
2026-03-05
Set for hearing March 18.
2026-02-18
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
referral-committee
2026-02-09
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8.
2026-02-05
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
Votes
Do pass
2026-04-29 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Choi: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Laird: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Ashby: yes
3rd Reading
2026-05-26 · pass · 38-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Cabaldon: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Niello: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Wiener: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Stern: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Laird: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Grove: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Allen: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Becker: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Jones: yes
- Choi: yes
- Alvarado-Gil: yes
- Limón: yes
- Dahle: other
- Gonzalez: other
Do pass. To Consent Calendar.
2026-07-01 · pass · 9-0
Member-level votes (10)
- Ransom: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Ward: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Ta: yes
- Johnson: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-04T05:21:06.318908Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 992. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.