CA SB 988
enactedCalifornia Motor Vehicle Glass Act.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 988 pass?
Yes. CA SB 988 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-27): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 666, Statutes of 2026.
What is CA SB 988 about?
Existing law enacts the California Combating Auto Retail Scams (CARS) Act, commencing October 1, 2026, that makes it a violation of the act for a dealer to, among other things, make any misrepresentation regarding material information about specified matters relating to the vehicle sale, including the costs or terms of purchasing, financing, or leasing a vehicle, the availability of vehicles at a total price communicated by the dealer, and the remedy available if a dealer fails to sell or lease a vehicle at the total price. Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including automobile insurance. Existing law requires an insurer that issues a policy providing automobile collision coverage, or automobile physical damage coverage, to pay to the repairer or to the named insured and the repairer, jointly, for repairs in a specified manner if a covered automobile is damaged by collision or otherwise and the insurer knows that the automobile will be repaired. Existing law prohibits an insurer from withholding the payment of reasonable repair cost benefits that are otherwise payable under the policy if the insured decides not to have the vehicle repaired. Existing law states that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer from restricting payment in cases of suspected fraud or from including a named loss payee or lienholder as an additional payee on the claims payment check or draft, as described. Existing law states that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer from requiring that a damaged vehicle be repaired as a condition for payment if the damage to the vehicle is sufficiently serious that safety features that are part of the vehicle's operating systems are compromised. This bill, the California Motor Vehicle Glass Act, would prohibit an insured under a motor vehicle insurance policy that covers windshield and calibration repair or replacement from, either before or after a claimed or covered loss, assigning, delegating, or otherwise transferring, in whole or in part, to any other person the insured's duties under the policy or rights or benefits under the policy, and would make a contract entered into, on and after January 1, 2027, under these circumstances void and unenforceable. The bill would require a motor vehicle glass repair shop (repair shop) , before providing service to a person for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass, to notify the person, among other things, whether the motor vehicle has an advanced driver assistance system, and if it does, whether calibration or recalibration of the motor vehicle's advanced driver assistance system is needed after a windshield repair or replacement as recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. The bill would require the repair shop to provide written notice to the person whether the calibration or recalibration was successful or not successful, as specified, and would require the repair shop to provide an itemized invoice and receipt upon completion of a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass. This bill would prohibit a repair shop from contracting with a person for repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass that would be paid by a first-party insurance policy until specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the person has made a first-party claim for the repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass under a motor vehicle insurance policy and that the repair shop has received a claim or referral number for the claim. The bill would require a repair shop to, among other things, provide the person a good faith estimate of the fees and costs that are anticipated to be charged to the person by the repair shop for the repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass. This bill would prohibit a repair shop, or any other person who is compensated for the solicitation of insurance claims, from offering a rebate, gift, gift card, cash, coupon, fee, prize, bonus, payment, incentive, inducement, or any other thing of value to any insured, insurance producer, or other person in exchange for directing or making a claim under a motor vehicle insurance policy for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass. The bill would also prohibit a repair shop from, among other things, submitting false, misleading, or incomplete documentation or information to an insured or an insured's insurer, including any agent of the insured or insurer, for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass or state that a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass will be paid for entirely by an insurer and at no cost to the insured unless the coverage has been verified by the insurer or the insurer's agent. This bill would state that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer, insurance producer, insurance adjuster, or any person acting on behalf of an insurer, insurance producer, or insurance adjuster from recommending a repair shop or providing an explanation to an insured of the coverage available, and any applicable liability limit, under any insurance policy. The bill would make a violation of these provisions punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed $500 for the first violation and not to exceed $2,000 for each subsequent violation.
Who sponsors CA SB 988?
Grayson is the primary sponsor of CA SB 988.
Description
Existing law enacts the California Combating Auto Retail Scams (CARS) Act, commencing October 1, 2026, that makes it a violation of the act for a dealer to, among other things, make any misrepresentation regarding material information about specified matters relating to the vehicle sale, including the costs or terms of purchasing, financing, or leasing a vehicle, the availability of vehicles at a total price communicated by the dealer, and the remedy available if a dealer fails to sell or lease a vehicle at the total price. Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including automobile insurance. Existing law requires an insurer that issues a policy providing automobile collision coverage, or automobile physical damage coverage, to pay to the repairer or to the named insured and the repairer, jointly, for repairs in a specified manner if a covered automobile is damaged by collision or otherwise and the insurer knows that the automobile will be repaired. Existing law prohibits an insurer from withholding the payment of reasonable repair cost benefits that are otherwise payable under the policy if the insured decides not to have the vehicle repaired. Existing law states that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer from restricting payment in cases of suspected fraud or from including a named loss payee or lienholder as an additional payee on the claims payment check or draft, as described. Existing law states that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer from requiring that a damaged vehicle be repaired as a condition for payment if the damage to the vehicle is sufficiently serious that safety features that are part of the vehicle's operating systems are compromised. This bill, the California Motor Vehicle Glass Act, would prohibit an insured under a motor vehicle insurance policy that covers windshield and calibration repair or replacement from, either before or after a claimed or covered loss, assigning, delegating, or otherwise transferring, in whole or in part, to any other person the insured's duties under the policy or rights or benefits under the policy, and would make a contract entered into, on and after January 1, 2027, under these circumstances void and unenforceable. The bill would require a motor vehicle glass repair shop (repair shop) , before providing service to a person for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass, to notify the person, among other things, whether the motor vehicle has an advanced driver assistance system, and if it does, whether calibration or recalibration of the motor vehicle's advanced driver assistance system is needed after a windshield repair or replacement as recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. The bill would require the repair shop to provide written notice to the person whether the calibration or recalibration was successful or not successful, as specified, and would require the repair shop to provide an itemized invoice and receipt upon completion of a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass. This bill would prohibit a repair shop from contracting with a person for repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass that would be paid by a first-party insurance policy until specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the person has made a first-party claim for the repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass under a motor vehicle insurance policy and that the repair shop has received a claim or referral number for the claim. The bill would require a repair shop to, among other things, provide the person a good faith estimate of the fees and costs that are anticipated to be charged to the person by the repair shop for the repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass. This bill would prohibit a repair shop, or any other person who is compensated for the solicitation of insurance claims, from offering a rebate, gift, gift card, cash, coupon, fee, prize, bonus, payment, incentive, inducement, or any other thing of value to any insured, insurance producer, or other person in exchange for directing or making a claim under a motor vehicle insurance policy for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass. The bill would also prohibit a repair shop from, among other things, submitting false, misleading, or incomplete documentation or information to an insured or an insured's insurer, including any agent of the insured or insurer, for a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass or state that a repair or replacement of damaged motor vehicle glass will be paid for entirely by an insurer and at no cost to the insured unless the coverage has been verified by the insurer or the insurer's agent. This bill would state that these provisions do not prohibit an insurer, insurance producer, insurance adjuster, or any person acting on behalf of an insurer, insurance producer, or insurance adjuster from recommending a repair shop or providing an explanation to an insured of the coverage available, and any applicable liability limit, under any insurance policy. The bill would make a violation of these provisions punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed $500 for the first violation and not to exceed $2,000 for each subsequent violation.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-05
- Latest action
- 2026-09-27 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 666, Statutes of 2026.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Graysonauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-09-27
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 666, Statutes of 2026.
became-law
2026-09-27
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2026-08-31
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 6 p.m.
executive-receipt
2026-08-26
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-26
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5874.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-08-24
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-08-24
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
2026-08-24
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6391.) Ordered to the Senate.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-08-19
Read third time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-08-19
Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-3
2026-08-13
Assembly Rule 63 suspended.
2026-08-13
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-08-13
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 13).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-06-24
June 24 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
2026-06-09
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-06-04
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-06-03
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-05-26
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2026-05-20
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1
2026-05-19
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4344.) Ordered to the Assembly.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-14
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-05-14
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4260.) (May 14).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-05-08
Set for hearing May 14.
2026-04-27
April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
2026-04-21
Set for hearing April 27.
2026-04-16
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-04-15
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3868.) (April 14).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-04-09
Set for hearing April 14.
2026-04-08
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2026-03-24
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
referral-committee
2026-03-24
Withdrawn from committee.
withdrawal
2026-03-23
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-02-18
Referred to Com. on INS.
referral-committee
2026-02-09
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8.
2026-02-05
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
- 02/05/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-05Compare
- 03/23/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-03-23Compare
- 04/16/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-16Compare
- 06/03/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-03Compare
- 06/04/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-04Compare
- 08/19/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-08-19Compare
- 08/28/26 - Enrolled — 2026-08-28Compare
- 09/27/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-27Compare
- (document, no version)Compare
- SB988Compare
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
Votes
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-04-14 · pass · 11-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Wahab: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Allen: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Stern: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Valladares: other
- Niello: other
Placed on suspense file
2026-04-27 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Wahab: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Richardson: yes
Do pass
2026-05-14 · pass · 5-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Wahab: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Dahle: other
- Seyarto: other
3rd Reading
2026-05-19 · pass · 35-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Allen: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Limón: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Becker: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Rubio: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Stern: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Alvarado-Gil: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Laird: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Richardson: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Grove: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: other
- Jones: other
- Choi: other
- Valladares: other
- Niello: other
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-06-09 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (12)
- Stefani: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Papan: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Harabedian: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-30T07:35:46.414591Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 988. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.