Bill Commons

CA SB 986

withdrawn

Major regulations.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 986 pass?

No. CA SB 986 was withdrawn and is no longer under consideration. Latest recorded action (2026-05-14): May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

What is CA SB 986 about?

(1) Existing law, known as the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) , governs the procedures for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) . The APA requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal an administrative regulation to, among other things, assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals, and requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to prepare and submit to the Department of Finance for review, a standardized regulatory impact analysis, as provided. The APA defines "major regulation," for purposes of the act, to mean any proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation subject to review by the OAL that will have an economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals in an amount exceeding $50,000,000, as provided. The APA provides exceptions for emergency regulations in the case of a situation that calls for immediate action to avoid serious harm to the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. This bill would prohibit a major regulation from taking effect until submission to, and expiration of a 60-day review period by, the Legislature, except as provided for emergency regulations. The bill would, prior to the expiration of the 60-day review period, require the Legislature to hold an informational hearing on the major regulation. The bill would authorize the Legislature to reject a major regulation during the review period by adoption of a concurrent resolution, and would prohibit a major regulation that has been rejected from taking effect, as specified. If the Legislature does not adopt a concurrent resolution rejecting the regulation within the 60-day review period, the bill would require that the regulation become effective. (2) The APA requires every agency subject to its provisions to prepare, submit to the OAL with the notice of proposed action, as specified, and make available to the public upon request, specified information, including an initial statement of reasons for proposing the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation. The APA requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to satisfy additional requirements, including by requiring the state agency to prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis in the manner prescribed by the Department of Finance, as specified. The APA requires the OAL to review all regulations adopted, amended, or repealed and submitted to it for publication in the California Code of Regulations Supplement and for transmittal to the Secretary of State and make determinations using all of the specified standards, including necessity. This bill would require every agency subject to its provisions to also submit the above-described specified information to the Legislature and would remove the condition that the information be prepared, submitted, and made available upon request. The bill would require the notice of proposed action to include a determination of whether the regulation is a major regulation, as specified, and would require the standardized regulatory impact analysis for a major regulation to address, among other things, the estimated effect on state revenue.

Who sponsors CA SB 986?

Seyarto is the primary sponsor of CA SB 986, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Description

(1) Existing law, known as the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) , governs the procedures for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) . The APA requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal an administrative regulation to, among other things, assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals, and requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to prepare and submit to the Department of Finance for review, a standardized regulatory impact analysis, as provided. The APA defines "major regulation," for purposes of the act, to mean any proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation subject to review by the OAL that will have an economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals in an amount exceeding $50,000,000, as provided. The APA provides exceptions for emergency regulations in the case of a situation that calls for immediate action to avoid serious harm to the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. This bill would prohibit a major regulation from taking effect until submission to, and expiration of a 60-day review period by, the Legislature, except as provided for emergency regulations. The bill would, prior to the expiration of the 60-day review period, require the Legislature to hold an informational hearing on the major regulation. The bill would authorize the Legislature to reject a major regulation during the review period by adoption of a concurrent resolution, and would prohibit a major regulation that has been rejected from taking effect, as specified. If the Legislature does not adopt a concurrent resolution rejecting the regulation within the 60-day review period, the bill would require that the regulation become effective. (2) The APA requires every agency subject to its provisions to prepare, submit to the OAL with the notice of proposed action, as specified, and make available to the public upon request, specified information, including an initial statement of reasons for proposing the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation. The APA requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to satisfy additional requirements, including by requiring the state agency to prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis in the manner prescribed by the Department of Finance, as specified. The APA requires the OAL to review all regulations adopted, amended, or repealed and submitted to it for publication in the California Code of Regulations Supplement and for transmittal to the Secretary of State and make determinations using all of the specified standards, including necessity. This bill would require every agency subject to its provisions to also submit the above-described specified information to the Legislature and would remove the condition that the information be prepared, submitted, and made available upon request. The bill would require the notice of proposed action to include a determination of whether the regulation is a major regulation, as specified, and would require the standardized regulatory impact analysis for a major regulation to address, among other things, the estimated effect on state revenue.

Introduced
2026-02-05
Latest action
2026-05-14 — May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Seyartoauthor
  • Stricklandcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-05-14

    May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

  2. 2026-05-08

    Set for hearing May 14.

  3. 2026-04-27

    April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  4. 2026-04-17

    Set for hearing April 27.

  5. 2026-04-16

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  6. 2026-04-16

    Withdrawn from committee.

    withdrawal

  7. 2026-04-15

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  8. 2026-04-14

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 14. Noes 0. Page 3865.) (April 14).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  9. 2026-03-26

    Set for hearing April 14.

  10. 2026-03-26

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  11. 2026-02-18

    Referred to Coms. on G.O. and JUD.

    referral-committee

  12. 2026-02-09

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8.

  13. 2026-02-05

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/05/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-05Compare
  • 03/26/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-03-26Compare
  • 04/15/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-15Compare
  • SB986Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]

    2026-04-14 · pass · 14-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Padilla: other
  • Placed on suspense file

    2026-04-27 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Richardson: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-30T08:20:40.105386Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 986. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.