CA SB 972
in committeeCalifornia Financing Law: commercial loans: investment advisers.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 972 pass?
Not yet. CA SB 972 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-14): May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
What is CA SB 972 about?
Existing law, the California Financing Law, generally regulates the business of finance lenders and brokers and prohibits any person from engaging in those businesses without obtaining a license from the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation. Existing law also imposes various requirements on licensees who offer or sell commercial loans, as defined. This bill would authorize an investment adviser that is registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, known as an "SEC-registered investment adviser," to apply for and obtain a finance lender license to act on its own behalf and on behalf of any client account if all lending activity conducted pursuant to the license is limited to commercial loans, in accordance with certain requirements. The bill would provide that a license obtained by an SEC-registered investment adviser to act as a finance lender covers any affiliate of the SEC-registered investment adviser that is also an SEC-registered investment adviser. The bill would require the SEC-registered investment adviser to maintain and file with the commissioner an appendix to its license application and renewals, listing each client account, as defined. Under the bill, as a condition of licensure, the SEC-registered investment adviser would be required to obtain and maintain a surety bond, complete background checks, meet minimum net worth and commercial loan threshold requirements, and file specified information with the commissioner under oath, subject to penalty of perjury. The bill also would authorize the commissioner to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to implement and administer these provisions. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution prohibits usury, which is the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things at a rate of interest in excess of specified rates, but exempts certain transactions and lenders from these provisions, and allows the Legislature to exempt additional classes of persons by statute. Existing law, the California Financing Law, establishes a class of exempt persons pursuant to the constitutional provision on usury that includes personal property brokers and specified lenders. This bill would provide that the class of exempt persons under the California Financing Law includes each person within the meaning of client account, as defined, to which the above-described provision on investment advisors applies. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors CA SB 972?
Grayson is the primary sponsor of CA SB 972.
Description
Existing law, the California Financing Law, generally regulates the business of finance lenders and brokers and prohibits any person from engaging in those businesses without obtaining a license from the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation. Existing law also imposes various requirements on licensees who offer or sell commercial loans, as defined. This bill would authorize an investment adviser that is registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, known as an "SEC-registered investment adviser," to apply for and obtain a finance lender license to act on its own behalf and on behalf of any client account if all lending activity conducted pursuant to the license is limited to commercial loans, in accordance with certain requirements. The bill would provide that a license obtained by an SEC-registered investment adviser to act as a finance lender covers any affiliate of the SEC-registered investment adviser that is also an SEC-registered investment adviser. The bill would require the SEC-registered investment adviser to maintain and file with the commissioner an appendix to its license application and renewals, listing each client account, as defined. Under the bill, as a condition of licensure, the SEC-registered investment adviser would be required to obtain and maintain a surety bond, complete background checks, meet minimum net worth and commercial loan threshold requirements, and file specified information with the commissioner under oath, subject to penalty of perjury. The bill also would authorize the commissioner to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to implement and administer these provisions. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution prohibits usury, which is the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things at a rate of interest in excess of specified rates, but exempts certain transactions and lenders from these provisions, and allows the Legislature to exempt additional classes of persons by statute. Existing law, the California Financing Law, establishes a class of exempt persons pursuant to the constitutional provision on usury that includes personal property brokers and specified lenders. This bill would provide that the class of exempt persons under the California Financing Law includes each person within the meaning of client account, as defined, to which the above-described provision on investment advisors applies. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-04
- Latest action
- 2026-05-14 — May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Graysonauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-05-14
May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
2026-05-08
Set for hearing May 14.
2026-04-20
April 20 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
2026-04-10
Set for hearing April 20.
2026-04-08
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 3757.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-03-25
Set for hearing April 7.
2026-03-18
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3599.) (March 18). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-02-24
Set for hearing March 18.
2026-02-11
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
referral-committee
2026-02-05
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 7.
2026-02-04
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
2026-03-18 · pass · 6-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Strickland: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Niello: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Hurtado: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2026-04-07 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Wahab: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Allen: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Stern: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Niello: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Laird: other
Placed on suspense file
2026-04-20 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Cervantes: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Seyarto: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 972. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.