CA SB 943
in committeePublic utilities: electricity: retail transmission rates: industrial transition usage.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 943 pass?
Not yet. CA SB 943 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-08-13): August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
What is CA SB 943 about?
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. This bill would require each electrical corporation to obtain the commission's approval for the terms of its retail transmission rates, as specified. This bill would authorize the commission to direct an electrical corporation with more than 100,000 service connections in California, when billing a large commercial or industrial customer for separately metered new load to provide industrial heat, to apply an adjustment factor to the per kilowatthour rate for each volumetrically determined surcharge on energy use to limit the surcharge ratio, as defined, to no more than 25% or an alternative maximum ratio determined by the commission to be just and reasonable and in furtherance of facilitating electrification of industrial energy use. The bill would prohibit an eligible industrial transition customer that pays a reduced surcharge from receiving an incentive funded by that surcharge in an amount that exceeds the amount of the surcharge paid by the eligible industrial transition customer. The bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2032, and every 5 years thereafter, to evaluate and report to the Legislature on the adjustment factor, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above provision would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing that provision would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law establishes the Independent System Operator as a nonprofit, public benefit corporation and requires the Independent System Operator, among other duties, to ensure the efficient use and reliable operation of the electrical transmission grid consistent with the achievement of planning and operating reserve criteria, as provided. This bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2028, to request the Independent System Operator to reconsider issues raised in its transmission access charge structure enhancements proceeding as potential reforms to its high-voltage transmission access charges. The bill would require the commission to develop recommendations for changes to high voltage transmission access charges that would improve consistency with the commission's causation principles, and to submit the recommendations to the Independent System Operator within a proceeding considering changes to the high-voltage transmission access charge structure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors CA SB 943?
Becker is the primary sponsor of CA SB 943, joined by 1 cosponsor.
Description
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. This bill would require each electrical corporation to obtain the commission's approval for the terms of its retail transmission rates, as specified. This bill would authorize the commission to direct an electrical corporation with more than 100,000 service connections in California, when billing a large commercial or industrial customer for separately metered new load to provide industrial heat, to apply an adjustment factor to the per kilowatthour rate for each volumetrically determined surcharge on energy use to limit the surcharge ratio, as defined, to no more than 25% or an alternative maximum ratio determined by the commission to be just and reasonable and in furtherance of facilitating electrification of industrial energy use. The bill would prohibit an eligible industrial transition customer that pays a reduced surcharge from receiving an incentive funded by that surcharge in an amount that exceeds the amount of the surcharge paid by the eligible industrial transition customer. The bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2032, and every 5 years thereafter, to evaluate and report to the Legislature on the adjustment factor, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above provision would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing that provision would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law establishes the Independent System Operator as a nonprofit, public benefit corporation and requires the Independent System Operator, among other duties, to ensure the efficient use and reliable operation of the electrical transmission grid consistent with the achievement of planning and operating reserve criteria, as provided. This bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2028, to request the Independent System Operator to reconsider issues raised in its transmission access charge structure enhancements proceeding as potential reforms to its high-voltage transmission access charges. The bill would require the commission to develop recommendations for changes to high voltage transmission access charges that would improve consistency with the commission's causation principles, and to submit the recommendations to the Independent System Operator within a proceeding considering changes to the high-voltage transmission access charge structure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-02
- Latest action
- 2026-08-13 — August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Beckerauthor
- Sterncoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-08-13
August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
2026-08-05
August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
2026-06-15
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-06-11
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 10).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-05-27
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-05-26
Referred to Com. on U. & E.
referral-committee
2026-05-20
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1
2026-05-19
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 3. Page 4363.) Ordered to the Assembly.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-14
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-05-14
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4258.) (May 14).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-05-08
Set for hearing May 14.
2026-04-13
April 13 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
2026-03-27
Set for hearing April 13.
2026-03-23
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-03-19
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0. Page 3588.) (March 17).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-03-09
Set for hearing March 17.
2026-02-11
Referred to Com. on E., U & C.
referral-committee
2026-02-03
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 5.
2026-02-02
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-03-17 · pass · 15-0
Member-level votes (17)
- Gonzalez: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Stern: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Allen: yes
- Becker: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Grove: other
- Caballero: other
Placed on suspense file
2026-04-13 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Dahle: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Grayson: yes
Do pass
2026-05-14 · pass · 5-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Wahab: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Dahle: other
- Seyarto: other
3rd Reading SB943 Becker et al.
2026-05-19 · pass · 33-3
Member-level votes (40)
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Allen: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Limón: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Becker: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Rubio: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Stern: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Laird: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Richardson: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Jones: no
- Grove: no
- Alvarado-Gil: no
- Choi: other
- Valladares: other
- Seyarto: other
- Niello: other
Do pass as amended, and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2026-06-10 · pass · 18-0
Member-level votes (18)
- Boerner: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Chen: yes
- Hart: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Davies: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Ta: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Papan: yes
- Harabedian: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 943. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.