Bill Commons

CA SB 883

enacted

Hazardous materials: reactive chemicals: methyl methacrylate: facilities.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 883 pass?

Yes. CA SB 883 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-27): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 658, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA SB 883 about?

(1) Existing law requires the Secretary for Environmental Protection to implement a unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program, known as the unified program. Existing law requires every county to apply to the secretary to be certified to implement the unified program, and authorizes a city or local agency that meets specified requirements to apply to the secretary to be certified to implement the unified program, as a certified unified program agency. Existing law authorizes a state or local agency that has a written agreement with a certified unified program agency, and is approved by the secretary, to implement or enforce one or more of the unified program elements as a participating agency. Existing law requires the certified unified program agency in each jurisdiction, in conjunction with participating agencies, to develop and implement a single, unified inspection and enforcement program to ensure coordinated, efficient, and effective enforcement of the unified program and any local ordinance or regulation pertaining to the handling of hazardous waste or hazardous materials. Existing law requires the secretary to establish a statewide information management system capable of receiving all data collected by the unified program agencies and reported by regulated businesses and to make all nonconfidential data available on the internet. This bill would prohibit a city or county, or city and county, from approving a building permit for a new reactive chemical storage facility, as defined, with the potential for an explosion, including, but not limited to, due to thermal runaway reaction, that may cause injury or death, unless the proposed facility has a backup cooling system or other contingency system approved by the unified program agency and is not adjacent to a home. The bill would require a city council or county board of supervisors, before approving a building permit for that purpose, to provide the public with notice and the opportunity to comment. If a city or county, or city and county, approves a building permit for that purpose, the bill would require the city or county, or city and county, to notify the Office of Emergency Services and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. The bill would make the approval of a building permit for certain reactive chemical storage facilities ineligible for a specified exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act. The bill would require a city, county, or city and county to include in the next revision of its emergency operations plan a specific designation for which emergency response department will serve as the lead agency for responding to hazardous materials incidents. By imposing additional requirements on cities and counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment to consider reactive chemical storage facilities as a factor in identifying disadvantaged communities for various purposes under existing law. This bill would revise the requirement for the secretary to make available on the internet all nonconfidential data collected by the unified program agencies and reported by regulated businesses to specifically authorize the secretary to determine the form and manner of making that data available on the internet. This bill would require the unified program agency in each jurisdiction to routinely conduct an inspection of each reactive chemical storage facility in its jurisdiction no less than once every 3 years. The bill would require the unified program agency to report the results of the inspection to the California Environmental Protection Agency, the Office of the State Fire Marshal, and the Office of Emergency Services. By imposing additional requirements on unified program agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires the California Environmental Protection Agency to obtain and maintain state delegation of, and to implement, the federal accidental release prevention program, with certain amendments specific to the state. Pursuant to these provisions, a stationary source, as defined, with a process that has a regulated substance present in more than a threshold quantity is required to prepare and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the unified program agency a risk management plan, unless the unified program agency makes a specified determination to exempt the stationary source from the program. Existing law imposes criminal penalties upon a stationary source that knowingly violates the requirements of the program. This bill would expand the program's definition of "regulated substance" to include methyl methacrylate and would require the California Environmental Protection Agency to adopt a state threshold quantity applicable to methyl methacrylate through regulation. By adding an additional substance to the program, the bill would expand the scope of a crime and impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide that a stationary source that stores or uses methyl methacrylate is not eligible for exemption from the program. Because the bill would make changes to provisions enforced by unified program agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA SB 883?

Umberg is the primary sponsor of CA SB 883, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Description

(1) Existing law requires the Secretary for Environmental Protection to implement a unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program, known as the unified program. Existing law requires every county to apply to the secretary to be certified to implement the unified program, and authorizes a city or local agency that meets specified requirements to apply to the secretary to be certified to implement the unified program, as a certified unified program agency. Existing law authorizes a state or local agency that has a written agreement with a certified unified program agency, and is approved by the secretary, to implement or enforce one or more of the unified program elements as a participating agency. Existing law requires the certified unified program agency in each jurisdiction, in conjunction with participating agencies, to develop and implement a single, unified inspection and enforcement program to ensure coordinated, efficient, and effective enforcement of the unified program and any local ordinance or regulation pertaining to the handling of hazardous waste or hazardous materials. Existing law requires the secretary to establish a statewide information management system capable of receiving all data collected by the unified program agencies and reported by regulated businesses and to make all nonconfidential data available on the internet. This bill would prohibit a city or county, or city and county, from approving a building permit for a new reactive chemical storage facility, as defined, with the potential for an explosion, including, but not limited to, due to thermal runaway reaction, that may cause injury or death, unless the proposed facility has a backup cooling system or other contingency system approved by the unified program agency and is not adjacent to a home. The bill would require a city council or county board of supervisors, before approving a building permit for that purpose, to provide the public with notice and the opportunity to comment. If a city or county, or city and county, approves a building permit for that purpose, the bill would require the city or county, or city and county, to notify the Office of Emergency Services and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. The bill would make the approval of a building permit for certain reactive chemical storage facilities ineligible for a specified exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act. The bill would require a city, county, or city and county to include in the next revision of its emergency operations plan a specific designation for which emergency response department will serve as the lead agency for responding to hazardous materials incidents. By imposing additional requirements on cities and counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment to consider reactive chemical storage facilities as a factor in identifying disadvantaged communities for various purposes under existing law. This bill would revise the requirement for the secretary to make available on the internet all nonconfidential data collected by the unified program agencies and reported by regulated businesses to specifically authorize the secretary to determine the form and manner of making that data available on the internet. This bill would require the unified program agency in each jurisdiction to routinely conduct an inspection of each reactive chemical storage facility in its jurisdiction no less than once every 3 years. The bill would require the unified program agency to report the results of the inspection to the California Environmental Protection Agency, the Office of the State Fire Marshal, and the Office of Emergency Services. By imposing additional requirements on unified program agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires the California Environmental Protection Agency to obtain and maintain state delegation of, and to implement, the federal accidental release prevention program, with certain amendments specific to the state. Pursuant to these provisions, a stationary source, as defined, with a process that has a regulated substance present in more than a threshold quantity is required to prepare and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the unified program agency a risk management plan, unless the unified program agency makes a specified determination to exempt the stationary source from the program. Existing law imposes criminal penalties upon a stationary source that knowingly violates the requirements of the program. This bill would expand the program's definition of "regulated substance" to include methyl methacrylate and would require the California Environmental Protection Agency to adopt a state threshold quantity applicable to methyl methacrylate through regulation. By adding an additional substance to the program, the bill would expand the scope of a crime and impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide that a stationary source that stores or uses methyl methacrylate is not eligible for exemption from the program. Because the bill would make changes to provisions enforced by unified program agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
2026-01-13
Latest action
2026-09-27 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 658, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Umbergauthor
  • Bennettcoauthor
  • Connollycoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-27

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 658, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-27

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-09-09

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-08-31

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.

  5. 2026-08-31

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. 2026-08-31

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  7. 2026-08-31

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 13. Page 6979.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2026-08-27

    Joint Rule 61(b)(16) suspended.

  9. 2026-08-27

    Read third time and amended.

  10. 2026-08-27

    Ordered to third reading.

  11. 2026-08-27

    Joint Rule 61(b)(16) suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 1. Page 6727.)

  12. 2026-08-21

    Assembly Rule 69(b)(1) suspended.

  13. 2026-08-21

    Read third time and amended.

  14. 2026-08-21

    Ordered to third reading.

  15. 2026-08-21

    Assembly Rule 69(b)(1) suspended. (Ayes 55. Noes 17. Page 6296.)

  16. 2026-08-17

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. 2026-08-13

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  18. 2026-08-13

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (August 13).

  19. 2026-08-13

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  20. 2026-08-05

    August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  21. 2026-07-02

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  22. 2026-07-01

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 30).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  23. 2026-06-30

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.S & T.M. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  24. 2026-06-22

    Assembly Rule 56 suspended.

  25. 2026-06-18

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.M.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  26. 2026-06-18

    Referred to Coms. on E.M and E.S & T.M.

    referral-committee

  27. 2026-06-18

    Pursuant to Assembly Rule 51.

  28. 2026-04-23

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  29. 2026-04-23

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4033.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  30. 2026-04-16

    Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  31. 2026-04-15

    From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 3867.) (April 14).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  32. 2026-04-09

    Set for hearing April 14.

  33. 2026-04-08

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  34. 2026-03-23

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  35. 2026-02-11

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  36. 2026-01-14

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 13.

  37. 2026-01-13

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 01/13/26 - Introduced — 2026-01-13Compare
  • 03/23/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-03-23Compare
  • 06/18/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-18Compare
  • 07/02/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-07-02Compare
  • 08/13/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-08-13Compare
  • 08/21/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-08-21Compare
  • 08/27/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-08-27Compare
  • 09/04/26 - Enrolled — 2026-09-04Compare
  • 09/27/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-27Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare
  • SB883Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

    2026-04-14 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Valladares: other
  • Consent Calendar 2nd

    2026-04-23 · pass · 37-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Wiener: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Wahab: other
    • Reyes: other
    • Ochoa Bogh: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials]

    2026-06-29 · pass · 4-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Arambula: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Hadwick: no
    • DeMaio: no
    • Bains: other
  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-30 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Connolly: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Castillo: no
    • Ellis: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-30T09:43:53.541144Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 883. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.