Bill Commons

CA SB 739

in committee

Transportation network companies: California Clean Miles Standard and Incentive Program.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 739 pass?

Not yet. CA SB 739 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-08-30): Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Garcia.

What is CA SB 739 about?

The Passenger Charter-party Carriers' Act provides for the regulation of charter-party carriers of passengers by the Public Utilities Commission and includes specific requirements applicable to transportation network companies, which are defined as certain organizations that, using an online-enabled application or platform, connect passengers with drivers using a personal vehicle. The act establishes the California Clean Miles Standard and Incentive Program, which requires, by January 1, 2020, that the State Air Resources Board establish a baseline for emissions of greenhouse gases for vehicles used on the online-enabled applications or platforms by transportation network companies on a per-passenger-mile basis, as provided. The act requires, by January 1, 2021, that the state board establish, and the commission implement, annual targets and goals, in accordance with specified requirements, starting in 2023 for the reduction under that baseline for emissions of greenhouse gases per passenger mile driven on behalf of a transportation network company. The act makes a violation of the act, or an order or direction of the commission pursuant to the act, a crime. This bill would require, by January 1, 2028, the state board to adopt, and the commission to implement, updated annual targets and goals starting in 2029 for the reduction under that baseline for emissions of greenhouse gases per passenger mile driven on behalf of a transportation network company in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would prohibit the commission from finding a transportation network company in violation of the program under specified circumstances. The bill would prohibit the commission from adopting or enforcing any penalties against transportation network companies for the failure to meet the targets or goals adopted under the program by the state board applicable before the 2029 calendar year. However, the bill would require a transportation network company to meet specified targets for passenger miles traveled using a zero-emission vehicle in the 2027 and 2028 calendars years. The act requires the state board to delay adoption, and the commission to delay implementation, of the targets and goals adopted pursuant to the program if the state board or commission finds that unanticipated barriers exist to expanding the usage of zero-emission vehicles by transportation network companies. The act requires the state board and commission to review the available data related to barriers to expanding the usage of zero-emission vehicles by transportation network companies no less often than every 2 years. This bill would instead require the state board to adjust the targets and goals, and the commission to delay implementation of those targets and goals, if the state board or the commission makes specified findings, including that barriers exist to expanding the usage of zero-emission vehicles by transportation network companies at the rates established by the state board. The bill would revise the above-described review requirement to instead require the state board and commission, no less often than every 2 years, to review the targets and goals adopted under the program and the available data necessary to make any of those specified findings.

Who sponsors CA SB 739?

Arreguín is the primary sponsor of CA SB 739, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Description

The Passenger Charter-party Carriers' Act provides for the regulation of charter-party carriers of passengers by the Public Utilities Commission and includes specific requirements applicable to transportation network companies, which are defined as certain organizations that, using an online-enabled application or platform, connect passengers with drivers using a personal vehicle. The act establishes the California Clean Miles Standard and Incentive Program, which requires, by January 1, 2020, that the State Air Resources Board establish a baseline for emissions of greenhouse gases for vehicles used on the online-enabled applications or platforms by transportation network companies on a per-passenger-mile basis, as provided. The act requires, by January 1, 2021, that the state board establish, and the commission implement, annual targets and goals, in accordance with specified requirements, starting in 2023 for the reduction under that baseline for emissions of greenhouse gases per passenger mile driven on behalf of a transportation network company. The act makes a violation of the act, or an order or direction of the commission pursuant to the act, a crime. This bill would require, by January 1, 2028, the state board to adopt, and the commission to implement, updated annual targets and goals starting in 2029 for the reduction under that baseline for emissions of greenhouse gases per passenger mile driven on behalf of a transportation network company in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would prohibit the commission from finding a transportation network company in violation of the program under specified circumstances. The bill would prohibit the commission from adopting or enforcing any penalties against transportation network companies for the failure to meet the targets or goals adopted under the program by the state board applicable before the 2029 calendar year. However, the bill would require a transportation network company to meet specified targets for passenger miles traveled using a zero-emission vehicle in the 2027 and 2028 calendars years. The act requires the state board to delay adoption, and the commission to delay implementation, of the targets and goals adopted pursuant to the program if the state board or commission finds that unanticipated barriers exist to expanding the usage of zero-emission vehicles by transportation network companies. The act requires the state board and commission to review the available data related to barriers to expanding the usage of zero-emission vehicles by transportation network companies no less often than every 2 years. This bill would instead require the state board to adjust the targets and goals, and the commission to delay implementation of those targets and goals, if the state board or the commission makes specified findings, including that barriers exist to expanding the usage of zero-emission vehicles by transportation network companies at the rates established by the state board. The bill would revise the above-described review requirement to instead require the state board and commission, no less often than every 2 years, to review the targets and goals adopted under the program and the available data necessary to make any of those specified findings.

Introduced
2025-02-21
Latest action
2026-08-30 — Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Garcia.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Arreguínauthor
  • Jacksoncoauthor
  • Ahrenscoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-08-30

    Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Garcia.

  2. 2026-08-13

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  3. 2026-08-13

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 13).

  4. 2026-08-13

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  5. 2026-08-05

    August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  6. 2026-07-02

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  7. 2026-07-02

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 1).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  8. 2026-06-30

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on C. & C. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  9. 2026-06-30

    Coauthors revised.

  10. 2026-06-25

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  11. 2026-06-18

    Assembly Rule 56 suspended.

  12. 2026-06-11

    Re-referred to Coms. on TRANS., C. & C., and APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

    referral-committee

  13. 2026-06-10

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  14. 2026-06-10

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  15. 2026-05-12

    From inactive file.

  16. 2026-05-12

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  17. 2026-05-11

    Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry.

  18. 2025-08-18

    Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry.

  19. 2025-07-17

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  20. 2025-07-16

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 16).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  21. 2025-07-02

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  22. 2025-06-05

    Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

    referral-committee

  23. 2025-05-29

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  24. 2025-05-29

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1329.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  25. 2025-05-27

    Ordered to special consent calendar.

  26. 2025-05-23

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  27. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1211.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  28. 2025-05-16

    Set for hearing May 23.

  29. 2025-04-21

    April 21 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  30. 2025-04-09

    Set for hearing April 21.

  31. 2025-04-08

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 682.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  32. 2025-03-13

    Set for hearing April 7.

  33. 2025-03-12

    Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

    referral-committee

  34. 2025-02-24

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  35. 2025-02-24

    Read first time.

    reading-1

  36. 2025-02-21

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/21/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-21Compare
  • 06/10/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-10Compare
  • 06/25/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-25Compare
  • 07/02/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-07-02Compare
  • SB739Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2025-04-07 · pass · 5-0

    Member-level votes (5)
    • Pérez: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Limón: yes
  • Placed on suspense file

    2025-04-21 · pass · 6-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Grayson: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Dahle: other
  • Do pass

    2025-05-23 · pass · 6-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Caballero: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: other
  • Special Consent

    2025-05-29 · pass · 38-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Limón: other
    • Reyes: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-01 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Castillo: yes
  • Do pass.

    2025-07-16 · pass · 13-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Wicks: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Pellerin: other
    • Arambula: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Communications and Conveyance]

    2026-06-29 · pass · 15-0

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Lackey: other
  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-07-01 · pass · 9-0

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Hoover: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Bonta: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 739. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.