Bill Commons

CA SB 308

enacted

Community colleges: audits: reports.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 308 pass?

Yes. CA SB 308 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-27): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 644, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA SB 308 about?

Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. Existing law requires the board of governors to adopt criteria and standards for periodic assessment of the fiscal condition of community college districts. In so doing, existing law requires the board of governors to develop, by regulation, appropriate procedures and actions for community college districts that fail to achieve fiscal stability or that fail to comply with the board of governors' recommendations, and to report to the chairs of the educational policy and fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature, the Director of Finance, and the Governor, related corrective actions taken by the community college district and related actions taken against the community college district. This bill would instead require the office of the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to report the above-described information, as needed, and to additionally report the information to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee. Beginning in the 2027–28 fiscal year, the bill would also require any information reported to be included with the below-described report related to community college district audits. Existing law requires the board of governors to annually submit a report to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee on the number and nature of audit exceptions and estimated amount of funds involved in the exceptions, a list of community college districts that failed to file their audits under existing law, and the actions taken by the State Department of Education to eliminate audit exceptions and comply with management improvement recommendations. This bill would revise the contents of the report to instead include actions taken by the chancellor's office to eliminate audit exceptions and comply with management improvement recommendations. The bill would instead require the chancellor's office to report that information, and to additionally report that information to the educational policy and fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature, the Director of Finance, and the Governor. Beginning in the 2027–28 fiscal year, the bill would also require the report to include any of the above-described information related to corrective actions taken by, and actions taken against, a community college district.

Who sponsors CA SB 308?

Seyarto is the primary sponsor of CA SB 308, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. Existing law requires the board of governors to adopt criteria and standards for periodic assessment of the fiscal condition of community college districts. In so doing, existing law requires the board of governors to develop, by regulation, appropriate procedures and actions for community college districts that fail to achieve fiscal stability or that fail to comply with the board of governors' recommendations, and to report to the chairs of the educational policy and fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature, the Director of Finance, and the Governor, related corrective actions taken by the community college district and related actions taken against the community college district. This bill would instead require the office of the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to report the above-described information, as needed, and to additionally report the information to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee. Beginning in the 2027–28 fiscal year, the bill would also require any information reported to be included with the below-described report related to community college district audits. Existing law requires the board of governors to annually submit a report to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee on the number and nature of audit exceptions and estimated amount of funds involved in the exceptions, a list of community college districts that failed to file their audits under existing law, and the actions taken by the State Department of Education to eliminate audit exceptions and comply with management improvement recommendations. This bill would revise the contents of the report to instead include actions taken by the chancellor's office to eliminate audit exceptions and comply with management improvement recommendations. The bill would instead require the chancellor's office to report that information, and to additionally report that information to the educational policy and fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature, the Director of Finance, and the Governor. Beginning in the 2027–28 fiscal year, the bill would also require the report to include any of the above-described information related to corrective actions taken by, and actions taken against, a community college district.

Introduced
2025-02-10
Latest action
2026-09-27 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 644, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Seyartoauthor
  • Rubiocoauthor
  • Patelcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-27

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 644, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-27

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-08-21

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. 2026-08-18

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. 2026-08-18

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  6. 2026-08-18

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 5514.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2026-08-13

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.

  8. 2026-08-13

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  9. 2026-08-13

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 6147.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2026-06-29

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  11. 2026-06-25

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  12. 2026-06-24

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 24).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  13. 2026-06-10

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  14. 2026-06-10

    Coauthors revised.

  15. 2026-05-11

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  16. 2026-05-04

    Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

    referral-committee

  17. 2026-01-26

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  18. 2026-01-26

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3286.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  19. 2026-01-21

    Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  20. 2026-01-20

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  21. 2026-01-15

    Set for hearing January 20.

  22. 2026-01-14

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3224.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  23. 2026-01-06

    Set for hearing January 14.

  24. 2026-01-05

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  25. 2025-04-01

    April 9 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  26. 2025-03-28

    Set for hearing April 9.

  27. 2025-02-19

    Referred to Com. on ED.

    referral-committee

  28. 2025-02-11

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.

  29. 2025-02-10

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/10/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-10Compare
  • 01/05/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-01-05Compare
  • 05/11/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-05-11Compare
  • 06/25/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-25Compare
  • 08/19/26 - Enrolled — 2026-08-19Compare
  • 09/27/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-27Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare
  • SB308Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2026-01-14 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Pérez: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
  • Consent Calendar 2nd

    2026-01-26 · pass · 39-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Grayson: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Gonzalez: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2026-06-09 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Jackson: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Patel: yes
  • Do pass as amended.

    2026-06-24 · pass · 15-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Wicks: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Krell: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-29T21:07:59.383161Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 308. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.