Bill Commons

CA SB 1359

enacted

Natural Gas Ratepayer Protection Act.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1359 pass?

Yes. CA SB 1359 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-30): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1026, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA SB 1359 about?

Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including gas corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law requires, until at least December 31, 2029, each gas corporation to submit to the commission a map that includes, among other things, the location of all potential gas distribution line replacement projects identified in its distribution integrity management plan and any foreseeable gas distribution pipeline replacements, as provided. This bill would require each gas corporation to submit an annual report to the commission that describes its expenditures associated with gas distribution infrastructure replacement and upgrade projects, as provided. The bill would require the commission, as part of its long-term gas planning rulemaking or a successor proceeding, to consider a framework for the depreciation of gas distribution infrastructure that reflects reasonably foreseeable changes in gas demand and is designed to minimize future ratepayer exposure to stranded asset costs, and would authorize the commission to apply the framework in evaluating the depreciation of, and cost recovery for, gas distribution infrastructure replacements and upgrades. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above provisions would be part of the Public Utilities Act and a violation of a commission action implementing this bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA SB 1359?

Stern is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1359.

Description

Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including gas corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law requires, until at least December 31, 2029, each gas corporation to submit to the commission a map that includes, among other things, the location of all potential gas distribution line replacement projects identified in its distribution integrity management plan and any foreseeable gas distribution pipeline replacements, as provided. This bill would require each gas corporation to submit an annual report to the commission that describes its expenditures associated with gas distribution infrastructure replacement and upgrade projects, as provided. The bill would require the commission, as part of its long-term gas planning rulemaking or a successor proceeding, to consider a framework for the depreciation of gas distribution infrastructure that reflects reasonably foreseeable changes in gas demand and is designed to minimize future ratepayer exposure to stranded asset costs, and would authorize the commission to apply the framework in evaluating the depreciation of, and cost recovery for, gas distribution infrastructure replacements and upgrades. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above provisions would be part of the Public Utilities Act and a violation of a commission action implementing this bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2026-02-20
Latest action
2026-09-30 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1026, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Sternauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-30

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1026, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-30

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-09-08

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-08-30

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 10.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. 2026-08-27

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. 2026-08-26

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  7. 2026-08-26

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 20. Page 6622.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2026-08-21

    Assembly Rule 69(b)(1) suspended.

  9. 2026-08-21

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2026-08-21

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  11. 2026-08-21

    Assembly Rule 69(b)(1) suspended. (Ayes 55. Noes 17. Page 6296.)

  12. 2026-08-06

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  13. 2026-08-05

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (August 5).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  14. 2026-06-29

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  15. 2026-06-25

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (June 24).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  16. 2026-06-15

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  17. 2026-06-04

    Referred to Com. on U. & E.

    referral-committee

  18. 2026-05-27

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  19. 2026-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 4484.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  20. 2026-05-18

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  21. 2026-05-14

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  22. 2026-05-14

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4274.) (May 14).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  23. 2026-05-08

    Set for hearing May 14.

  24. 2026-05-04

    May 4 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  25. 2026-04-24

    Set for hearing May 4.

  26. 2026-04-22

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 4. Page 3974.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  27. 2026-04-16

    Set for hearing April 21.

  28. 2026-04-13

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  29. 2026-04-08

    Re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.

    referral-committee

  30. 2026-03-25

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  31. 2026-03-04

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  32. 2026-02-23

    Read first time.

    reading-1

  33. 2026-02-23

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  34. 2026-02-20

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/20/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-20Compare
  • 03/25/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-03-25Compare
  • 04/13/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-13Compare
  • 05/14/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-05-14Compare
  • 06/15/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-15Compare
  • 06/29/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-29Compare
  • 08/21/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-08-21Compare
  • 09/02/26 - Enrolled — 2026-09-02Compare
  • 09/30/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-30Compare
  • SB1359Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-21 · pass · 10-4

    Member-level votes (17)
    • Becker: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Dahle: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Grove: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Caballero: other
    • Richardson: other
    • Rubio: other
  • Placed on suspense file

    2026-05-04 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Grayson: yes
  • Do pass as amended

    2026-05-14 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: no
    • Seyarto: no
  • 3rd Reading

    2026-05-27 · pass · 23-13

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Limón: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Grayson: no
    • Niello: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Hurtado: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Choi: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Grove: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Jones: no
    • Caballero: no
    • Rubio: no
    • Richardson: other
    • Durazo: other
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: other
    • Dahle: other
  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-24 · pass · 12-5

    Member-level votes (18)
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Patterson: no
    • Chen: no
    • Davies: no
    • Wallis: no
    • Ta: no
    • Mark González: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-03T08:12:59.620695Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1359. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.