CA SB 1290
Status unknownCartwright Act: public procurement of goods and services: Department of Justice: examination of public entity records.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 1290 pass?
The current status of CA SB 1290 is not known from the official record. Latest recorded action (2026-04-16): April 22 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
What is CA SB 1290 about?
Existing law establishes the Attorney General as the head of the Department of Justice, with charge of all legal matters in which the state is interested, except as specified. Existing law imposes various requirements on the Attorney General related to consumer protection, including, among others, the supervision of charitable trusts and the enforcement of antitrust laws. Existing law, commonly known as the Cartwright Act, identifies certain acts that are unlawful restraints of trade and unlawful trusts. This bill would authorize the Department of Justice to request to examine contract records, as defined, held by a public entity if the request seeks information that is reasonably related to an investigation initiated by the Attorney General to identify bid rigging and other violations of California law concerning the public procurement of goods and services, and the contract amount exceeds $100,000. The bill would require a public entity to permit the examination and, upon demand, produce within 30 days, in complete and unredacted form, copies of all contract records. The bill would require information and documents obtained under the bill's provisions to only be used for the purpose described above, and would exempt documents or information protected by the attorney-client privilege, as specified. The bill would define "public entity" to include the state, local agencies, and any other political subdivision or public corporation. By imposing new duties on local public entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the department to pay a fee to the public entity limited to the direct cost of duplication under these provisions, or a statutory fee, if applicable. The bill would require the department to maintain the confidentiality of the documents or information received to the greatest extent required by law, as specified. The bill would prohibit information obtained in response to a request under these provisions from being provided in response to a request pursuant to the California Public Records Act, as described. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors CA SB 1290?
Hurtado is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1290.
Description
Existing law establishes the Attorney General as the head of the Department of Justice, with charge of all legal matters in which the state is interested, except as specified. Existing law imposes various requirements on the Attorney General related to consumer protection, including, among others, the supervision of charitable trusts and the enforcement of antitrust laws. Existing law, commonly known as the Cartwright Act, identifies certain acts that are unlawful restraints of trade and unlawful trusts. This bill would authorize the Department of Justice to request to examine contract records, as defined, held by a public entity if the request seeks information that is reasonably related to an investigation initiated by the Attorney General to identify bid rigging and other violations of California law concerning the public procurement of goods and services, and the contract amount exceeds $100,000. The bill would require a public entity to permit the examination and, upon demand, produce within 30 days, in complete and unredacted form, copies of all contract records. The bill would require information and documents obtained under the bill's provisions to only be used for the purpose described above, and would exempt documents or information protected by the attorney-client privilege, as specified. The bill would define "public entity" to include the state, local agencies, and any other political subdivision or public corporation. By imposing new duties on local public entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the department to pay a fee to the public entity limited to the direct cost of duplication under these provisions, or a statutory fee, if applicable. The bill would require the department to maintain the confidentiality of the documents or information received to the greatest extent required by law, as specified. The bill would prohibit information obtained in response to a request under these provisions from being provided in response to a request pursuant to the California Public Records Act, as described. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-20
- Latest action
- 2026-04-16 — April 22 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Hurtadoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-16
April 22 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
2026-04-15
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3869.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-04-15
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-04-14
Set for hearing April 22 in L. GOV. pending receipt.
2026-04-09
Set for hearing April 14.
2026-04-08
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.
referral-committee
2026-03-23
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-03-04
Referred to Com. on RLS.
referral-committee
2026-02-23
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
2026-02-23
Read first time.
reading-1
2026-02-20
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]
2026-04-14 · pass · 11-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Wahab: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Allen: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Stern: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Valladares: other
- Niello: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-30T23:55:54.487026Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1290. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.