Bill Commons

CA SB 1257

in committee

Federal immigration enforcement: report.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1257 pass?

Not yet. CA SB 1257 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-08-13): August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

What is CA SB 1257 about?

Existing law, the California Values Act, requires the Attorney General, by October 1, 2018, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, courthouses, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement facilities, the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, the Division of Workers' Compensation, and shelters and ensure that they remain safe and accessible to all California residents, regardless of immigration status. The act requires all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses to implement the model policy or an equivalent policy. This bill would require the Attorney General, on or before October 30, 2027, and annually thereafter, to submit to the Legislature and the Governor, and post on its internet website, a report that includes, among other things, a summary of all immigration enforcement incidents and activities occurring on or after September 1, 2025, conducted by a person at a designated location that have been reported by the designated location or a person who witnessed the activity to the Attorney General, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to request representatives of a designated location to furnish any reported immigration enforcement incidents and activities as part of compiling its annual report and would authorize the Attorney General to issue civil penalties or conduct other enforcement activity to ensure compliance with these provisions. The bill would prohibit the report from including any personally identifiable information regarding an individual stopped, detained, or arrested by an individual conducting an immigration enforcement activity. The bill would define "designated location" to mean schoolsites, health care provider entities, shelters, polling places, state courthouses, public transportation access points, and state and local government property. The bill would define "immigration enforcement" for these purposes to mean an effort to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of a federal civil or criminal immigration lawsuit. To the extent the bill would impose duties on locals, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA SB 1257?

Arreguín is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1257, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law, the California Values Act, requires the Attorney General, by October 1, 2018, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, courthouses, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement facilities, the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, the Division of Workers' Compensation, and shelters and ensure that they remain safe and accessible to all California residents, regardless of immigration status. The act requires all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses to implement the model policy or an equivalent policy. This bill would require the Attorney General, on or before October 30, 2027, and annually thereafter, to submit to the Legislature and the Governor, and post on its internet website, a report that includes, among other things, a summary of all immigration enforcement incidents and activities occurring on or after September 1, 2025, conducted by a person at a designated location that have been reported by the designated location or a person who witnessed the activity to the Attorney General, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to request representatives of a designated location to furnish any reported immigration enforcement incidents and activities as part of compiling its annual report and would authorize the Attorney General to issue civil penalties or conduct other enforcement activity to ensure compliance with these provisions. The bill would prohibit the report from including any personally identifiable information regarding an individual stopped, detained, or arrested by an individual conducting an immigration enforcement activity. The bill would define "designated location" to mean schoolsites, health care provider entities, shelters, polling places, state courthouses, public transportation access points, and state and local government property. The bill would define "immigration enforcement" for these purposes to mean an effort to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of a federal civil or criminal immigration lawsuit. To the extent the bill would impose duties on locals, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
2026-02-19
Latest action
2026-08-13 — August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Arreguínauthor
  • Pérezcoauthor
  • Weber Piersoncoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-08-13

    August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

  2. 2026-08-05

    August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  3. 2026-07-01

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  4. 2026-06-24

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2026-06-24

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  6. 2026-06-08

    Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.

    referral-committee

  7. 2026-05-26

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  8. 2026-05-26

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 8. Page 4441.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2026-05-14

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4271.) (May 14).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  10. 2026-05-14

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  11. 2026-05-08

    Set for hearing May 14.

  12. 2026-04-27

    April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  13. 2026-04-21

    Set for hearing April 27.

  14. 2026-04-16

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  15. 2026-04-15

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 3869.) (April 14).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  16. 2026-04-06

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  17. 2026-03-27

    Set for hearing April 14.

  18. 2026-03-25

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  19. 2026-03-24

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3661.) (March 24).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  20. 2026-03-10

    Set for hearing March 24.

  21. 2026-03-04

    Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.

    referral-committee

  22. 2026-02-20

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  23. 2026-02-19

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/19/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-19Compare
  • 03/25/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-03-25Compare
  • 04/06/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-06Compare
  • 04/16/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-16Compare
  • 06/24/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-24Compare
  • SB1257Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]

    2026-03-24 · pass · 4-1

    Member-level votes (6)
    • Wiener: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Seyarto: no
    • Cortese: other
  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-14 · pass · 11-1

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Niello: no
    • Valladares: other
  • Placed on suspense file

    2026-04-27 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Richardson: yes
  • Do pass

    2026-05-14 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: no
    • Seyarto: no
  • 3rd Reading SB1257 Arreguín et al.

    2026-05-26 · pass · 29-8

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Strickland: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Jones: no
    • Choi: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Grove: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Dahle: other
    • Niello: other
    • Gonzalez: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

    2026-06-23 · pass · 7-1

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Lackey: no
    • Alanis: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-30 · pass · 9-3

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Bryan: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Dixon: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Macedo: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-08-07T01:47:39.892548Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1257. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.