Bill Commons

CA SB 1242

enacted

Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1242 pass?

Yes. CA SB 1242 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-27): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 687, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA SB 1242 about?

Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes specified individuals to file a petition to commence the CARE process, including, but not limited to, a spouse, parent, sibling, child, grandparent, or an individual who stands in loco parentis to the respondent. Existing law requires the court to issue an order relieving the original petitioner if the petitioner is someone other than the director of a county behavioral health agency or their designee and appoint the director or their designee as the successor petitioner. Existing law requires the original petitioner to have specified rights to notice of proceedings if the petitioner is a parent or specified family member or the person with whom the respondent resides. Existing law authorizes the court to allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondent's CARE proceedings to the extent the respondent consents. This bill would authorize the original petitioner to provide specified information regarding the respondent, including the respondent's condition, treatment history, and housing status. The bill would require the CARE team to review specified parts of the provided information, including that relevant to the respondent's care and treatment, and would authorize the court to consider that information in evaluating the respondent's progress and compliance, among other things. The bill would specify that the respondent's consent is not required to receive this information from the original petitioner and that submission of this information does not confer party status on the original petitioner or create a right to direct treatment decisions, obtain discovery, access confidential records, receive protected health information, attend confidential proceedings, or otherwise participate in the proceedings without the respondent's consent, except as expressly provided by law.

Who sponsors CA SB 1242?

Choi is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1242, joined by 2 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law, the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act, authorizes specified adult persons to petition a civil court to create a voluntary CARE agreement or a court-ordered CARE plan and implement services, to be provided by county behavioral health agencies, to provide behavioral health care, including stabilization medication, housing, and other enumerated services, to adults who are currently experiencing a severe mental illness and have a diagnosis identified in the disorder class schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and who meet other specified criteria. Existing law authorizes specified individuals to file a petition to commence the CARE process, including, but not limited to, a spouse, parent, sibling, child, grandparent, or an individual who stands in loco parentis to the respondent. Existing law requires the court to issue an order relieving the original petitioner if the petitioner is someone other than the director of a county behavioral health agency or their designee and appoint the director or their designee as the successor petitioner. Existing law requires the original petitioner to have specified rights to notice of proceedings if the petitioner is a parent or specified family member or the person with whom the respondent resides. Existing law authorizes the court to allow the original petitioner to participate in the respondent's CARE proceedings to the extent the respondent consents. This bill would authorize the original petitioner to provide specified information regarding the respondent, including the respondent's condition, treatment history, and housing status. The bill would require the CARE team to review specified parts of the provided information, including that relevant to the respondent's care and treatment, and would authorize the court to consider that information in evaluating the respondent's progress and compliance, among other things. The bill would specify that the respondent's consent is not required to receive this information from the original petitioner and that submission of this information does not confer party status on the original petitioner or create a right to direct treatment decisions, obtain discovery, access confidential records, receive protected health information, attend confidential proceedings, or otherwise participate in the proceedings without the respondent's consent, except as expressly provided by law.

Introduced
2026-02-19
Latest action
2026-09-27 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 687, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Choiauthor
  • Jeff Gonzalezcoauthor
  • Hadwickcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-27

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 687, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-27

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-09-03

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-08-27

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  5. 2026-08-25

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  6. 2026-08-25

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. 2026-08-25

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 6475.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2026-08-17

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  9. 2026-08-13

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (August 13).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  10. 2026-08-13

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  11. 2026-08-13

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  12. 2026-08-05

    August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  13. 2026-07-01

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  14. 2026-06-17

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  15. 2026-05-26

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  16. 2026-05-19

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  17. 2026-05-18

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 1. Page 4315.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  18. 2026-04-30

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  19. 2026-04-29

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 4085.) (April 28).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  20. 2026-04-20

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  21. 2026-04-10

    Set for hearing April 28.

  22. 2026-03-04

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  23. 2026-02-20

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  24. 2026-02-19

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/19/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-19Compare
  • 04/20/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-20Compare
  • 06/17/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-17Compare
  • 08/13/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-08-13Compare
  • 08/30/26 - Enrolled — 2026-08-30Compare
  • 09/27/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-27Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare
  • SB1242Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass

    2026-04-28 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Weber Pierson: other
    • Niello: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Stern: yes
  • 3rd Reading

    2026-05-18 · pass · 36-1

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Caballero: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Weber Pierson: no
    • Padilla: other
    • Pérez: other
    • Niello: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-30 · pass · 11-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Stefani: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Bryan: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-30T07:35:46.414591Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1242. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.