Bill Commons

CA SB 1229

introduced

Coastal resources: coastal development permits: disaster exemption.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1229 pass?

Not yet. CA SB 1229 has been introduced but has not advanced to a vote. Latest recorded action (2026-08-30): Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Garcia.

What is CA SB 1229 about?

Existing law, the California Coastal Act of 1976, among other things, requires anyone wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, except as specified, in addition to obtaining any other permit required by law from any local government or from any state, regional, or local agency, to obtain a coastal development permit from the California Coastal Commission or a local government, as provided. The act provides that a coastal development permit is not required for the replacement of any structure, other than a public works facility, destroyed by a disaster. This bill would prohibit that coastal development permit exemption from applying to the replacement of a structure by an applicant who was not listed as the property owner of record immediately preceding the disaster if replacement of the structure would, among other things, encroach upon an open space easement or deed restriction that has been recorded or offered for dedication, as provided. By creating additional duties for a local government in reviewing coastal development permits, the bill would impose state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA SB 1229?

Allen is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1229.

Description

Existing law, the California Coastal Act of 1976, among other things, requires anyone wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, except as specified, in addition to obtaining any other permit required by law from any local government or from any state, regional, or local agency, to obtain a coastal development permit from the California Coastal Commission or a local government, as provided. The act provides that a coastal development permit is not required for the replacement of any structure, other than a public works facility, destroyed by a disaster. This bill would prohibit that coastal development permit exemption from applying to the replacement of a structure by an applicant who was not listed as the property owner of record immediately preceding the disaster if replacement of the structure would, among other things, encroach upon an open space easement or deed restriction that has been recorded or offered for dedication, as provided. By creating additional duties for a local government in reviewing coastal development permits, the bill would impose state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
2026-02-19
Latest action
2026-08-30 — Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Garcia.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Allenauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-08-30

    Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Garcia.

  2. 2026-07-02

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  3. 2026-07-01

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (July 1).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  4. 2026-06-24

    June 24 hearing postponed by committee.

  5. 2026-06-09

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  6. 2026-05-26

    Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

    referral-committee

  7. 2026-05-20

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  8. 2026-05-19

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 4335.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2026-04-21

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  10. 2026-04-20

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  11. 2026-04-14

    Set for hearing April 20.

  12. 2026-04-09

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  13. 2026-04-08

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3758.) (April 7).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  14. 2026-03-25

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  15. 2026-03-24

    Set for hearing April 7.

  16. 2026-03-16

    March 24 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  17. 2026-03-11

    Set for hearing March 24.

  18. 2026-03-04

    Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

    referral-committee

  19. 2026-02-20

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  20. 2026-02-19

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/19/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-19Compare
  • 03/25/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-03-25Compare
  • 04/09/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-09Compare
  • SB1229Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-07 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Stern: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Grove: no
    • Seyarto: no
  • 3rd Reading

    2026-05-19 · pass · 29-9

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Strickland: no
    • Grove: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Dahle: no
    • Jones: no
    • Choi: no
    • Wiener: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Valladares: other
    • Niello: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-08 · pass · 9-4

    Member-level votes (14)
    • Bryan: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Alanis: no
    • Ellis: no
    • Macedo: no
    • Hoover: no
    • Muratsuchi: other
  • Do pass.

    2026-07-01 · pass · 8-3

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Mark González: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Hoover: no
    • Ta: no
    • Dixon: no
    • Tangipa: other
    • Calderon: other
    • Sharp-Collins: other
    • Pellerin: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-07-30T13:52:12.397178Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1229. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.