Bill Commons

CA SB 1123

in committee

Administrative Procedure Act: major regulations.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1123 pass?

Not yet. CA SB 1123 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-06-04): Referred to Coms. on E.D., G., & H.I. and JUD.

What is CA SB 1123 about?

The Administrative Procedure Act requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal an administrative regulation to assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals and avoid the imposition of unnecessary or unreasonable regulations or reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements. The act requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to satisfy additional requirements, including by requiring the state agency to prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis in the manner prescribed by the Department of Finance, as specified, and requires the analysis to address certain items, including the creation or elimination of jobs within the state and the competitive advantages or disadvantages for businesses currently doing business within the state. The act defines "major regulation" to mean a proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law, as specified, that will have an economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals in an amount exceeding $50,000,000, as estimated by the agency. This bill would require an agency, in estimating the economic impact of adopting, amending, or repealing a regulation, to identify and calculate any offsetting benefits, impacts, or savings that might result directly or indirectly from that adoption, amendment, or repeal and factor those benefits, impacts, or savings into its economic impact estimate.

Who sponsors CA SB 1123?

Wiener is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1123.

Description

The Administrative Procedure Act requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal an administrative regulation to assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals and avoid the imposition of unnecessary or unreasonable regulations or reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements. The act requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to satisfy additional requirements, including by requiring the state agency to prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis in the manner prescribed by the Department of Finance, as specified, and requires the analysis to address certain items, including the creation or elimination of jobs within the state and the competitive advantages or disadvantages for businesses currently doing business within the state. The act defines "major regulation" to mean a proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation subject to review by the Office of Administrative Law, as specified, that will have an economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals in an amount exceeding $50,000,000, as estimated by the agency. This bill would require an agency, in estimating the economic impact of adopting, amending, or repealing a regulation, to identify and calculate any offsetting benefits, impacts, or savings that might result directly or indirectly from that adoption, amendment, or repeal and factor those benefits, impacts, or savings into its economic impact estimate.

Introduced
2026-02-17
Latest action
2026-06-04 — Referred to Coms. on E.D., G., & H.I. and JUD.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Wienerauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-06-04

    Referred to Coms. on E.D., G., & H.I. and JUD.

    referral-committee

  2. 2026-05-26

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  3. 2026-05-26

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 8. Page 4445.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  4. 2026-05-14

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  5. 2026-05-14

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4265.) (May 14).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  6. 2026-05-08

    Set for hearing May 14.

  7. 2026-04-27

    April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  8. 2026-04-17

    Set for hearing April 27.

  9. 2026-04-14

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3. Page 3865.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  10. 2026-04-13

    Set for hearing April 14.

  11. 2026-02-26

    Referred to Com. on G.O.

    referral-committee

  12. 2026-02-18

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.

  13. 2026-02-17

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-14 · pass · 9-3

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Dahle: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Hurtado: other
    • Choi: other
    • Richardson: other
  • Placed on suspense file

    2026-04-27 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Richardson: yes
  • Do pass

    2026-05-14 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: no
    • Seyarto: no
  • 3rd Reading

    2026-05-26 · pass · 26-8

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Strickland: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Jones: no
    • Choi: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Grove: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Richardson: other
    • Gonzalez: other
    • Caballero: other
    • Dahle: other
    • Niello: other
    • Grayson: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1123. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.