Bill Commons

CA SB 1094

enacted

Prescription drugs.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1094 pass?

Yes. CA SB 1094 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-09-30): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1007, Statutes of 2026.

What is CA SB 1094 about?

(1) The Pharmacy Law governs the practice of pharmacy in this state, including the permissible duties of licensed pharmacists. A knowing violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor. Existing law authorizes a pharmacist to select an alternative biological product when filling a prescription order for a prescribed biological product if the alternative biological product is interchangeable, as defined, and the prescriber does not personally indicate in a specified manner that a substitution is not to be made. This bill would additionally authorize a pharmacist to select an alternative biological product when filling a prescription order for a prescribed biological product if the alternative biological product is biosimilar to, as defined, or interchangeable with, the prescribed reference product, and the prescriber does not personally indicate in a specified manner that a substitution is not to be made. Because a knowing violation of this provision would be a misdemeanor, the bill would create a new crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan that covers prescription drug benefits from limiting or excluding coverage for a drug that was previously approved for coverage if an enrollee continues to be prescribed that drug and that drug is appropriately prescribed and considered safe and effective for treating the enrollee's medical condition. Existing law specifies that these provisions do not preclude a prescribing provider from prescribing another drug covered by the plan that is medically appropriate for the enrollee or a generic drug substitution authorized by a pharmacist, as specified. This bill would prohibit a health insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from limiting or excluding coverage for a drug that was previously approved for coverage if an insured continues to be prescribed that drug and the drug is appropriately prescribed, and is considered safe and effective for treating the insured's medical condition. With respect to both health care service plans and health insurers, the bill would specify that these provisions do not prohibit a prescribing provider from prescribing a drug, biosimilar, or interchangeable biological product substitution authorized by a pharmacist, as described above. The bill would authorize a health care service plan, health insurer, or utilization review organization to require an enrollee or insured to try a biosimilar or interchangeable biological product in place of a prescribed reference product that is subject to continuing coverage by the plan or insurer if specified conditions are met. The bill would require a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2027, that provides prescription drug benefits and maintains one or more drug formularies that include a reference product to include on the relevant formulary at least one biosimilar or interchangeable biological product licensed for the same reference product if the biosimilar has a lower net cost to the plan or insurer than the reference product. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) This bill would provide that its provisions are severable. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA SB 1094?

Weber Pierson is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1094.

Description

(1) The Pharmacy Law governs the practice of pharmacy in this state, including the permissible duties of licensed pharmacists. A knowing violation of the Pharmacy Law is a misdemeanor. Existing law authorizes a pharmacist to select an alternative biological product when filling a prescription order for a prescribed biological product if the alternative biological product is interchangeable, as defined, and the prescriber does not personally indicate in a specified manner that a substitution is not to be made. This bill would additionally authorize a pharmacist to select an alternative biological product when filling a prescription order for a prescribed biological product if the alternative biological product is biosimilar to, as defined, or interchangeable with, the prescribed reference product, and the prescriber does not personally indicate in a specified manner that a substitution is not to be made. Because a knowing violation of this provision would be a misdemeanor, the bill would create a new crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits a health care service plan that covers prescription drug benefits from limiting or excluding coverage for a drug that was previously approved for coverage if an enrollee continues to be prescribed that drug and that drug is appropriately prescribed and considered safe and effective for treating the enrollee's medical condition. Existing law specifies that these provisions do not preclude a prescribing provider from prescribing another drug covered by the plan that is medically appropriate for the enrollee or a generic drug substitution authorized by a pharmacist, as specified. This bill would prohibit a health insurance policy that covers prescription drug benefits from limiting or excluding coverage for a drug that was previously approved for coverage if an insured continues to be prescribed that drug and the drug is appropriately prescribed, and is considered safe and effective for treating the insured's medical condition. With respect to both health care service plans and health insurers, the bill would specify that these provisions do not prohibit a prescribing provider from prescribing a drug, biosimilar, or interchangeable biological product substitution authorized by a pharmacist, as described above. The bill would authorize a health care service plan, health insurer, or utilization review organization to require an enrollee or insured to try a biosimilar or interchangeable biological product in place of a prescribed reference product that is subject to continuing coverage by the plan or insurer if specified conditions are met. The bill would require a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2027, that provides prescription drug benefits and maintains one or more drug formularies that include a reference product to include on the relevant formulary at least one biosimilar or interchangeable biological product licensed for the same reference product if the biosimilar has a lower net cost to the plan or insurer than the reference product. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) This bill would provide that its provisions are severable. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2026-02-13
Latest action
2026-09-30 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1007, Statutes of 2026.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Weber Piersonauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-09-30

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1007, Statutes of 2026.

    became-law

  2. 2026-09-30

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2026-09-03

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2026-08-27

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  5. 2026-08-26

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  6. 2026-08-26

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. 2026-08-26

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6607.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2026-08-19

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2026-08-19

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2026-08-13

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  11. 2026-08-13

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  12. 2026-08-13

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 13).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  13. 2026-08-05

    August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  14. 2026-07-02

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  15. 2026-07-01

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 30).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  16. 2026-06-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  17. 2026-05-26

    Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  18. 2026-05-19

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  19. 2026-05-18

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4316.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  20. 2026-05-05

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  21. 2026-05-04

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  22. 2026-04-24

    Set for hearing May 4.

  23. 2026-04-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 4010.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  24. 2026-04-10

    Set for hearing April 22.

  25. 2026-04-08

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  26. 2026-04-07

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3740.) (April 6).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  27. 2026-03-26

    Set for hearing April 6.

  28. 2026-03-17

    March 23 hearing postponed by committee.

  29. 2026-03-16

    Set for hearing March 23.

  30. 2026-02-26

    Referred to Coms. on B. P. & E.D. and HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  31. 2026-02-17

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 16.

  32. 2026-02-13

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/13/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-13Compare
  • 04/08/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-08Compare
  • 07/02/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-07-02Compare
  • 08/19/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-08-19Compare
  • 08/30/26 - Enrolled — 2026-08-30Compare
  • 09/30/26 - Chaptered — 2026-09-30Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare
  • SB1094Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Health]

    2026-04-06 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Strickland: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: other
  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-22 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: other
  • 3rd Reading SB1094 Weber Pierson

    2026-05-18 · pass · 38-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Caballero: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Padilla: other
    • Niello: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Health]

    2026-06-23 · pass · 19-0

    Member-level votes (19)
    • Patterson: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-30 · pass · 14-0

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: other
    • Celeste Rodriguez: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-03T19:40:11.332654Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1094. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.