CA SB 1092
in committeeMobilehome parks: resident organizations: option to purchase.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 1092 pass?
Not yet. CA SB 1092 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-07-01): From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
What is CA SB 1092 about?
Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, requires the owner of a mobilehome park who lists for sale or offers to sell the mobilehome park to any party to provide written notice of the owner's intention to sell the mobilehome park to a resident organization formed by homeowners for purposes of converting the mobilehome park to condominium or stock cooperative ownership interests and for purchasing the mobilehome park, subject to specified conditions. This bill would repeal those provisions and would instead require management of a mobilehome park to give notice to each resident household in the park, resident organization, as defined, and specified public entities, as provided, if certain events demonstrating management's intent to sell occur, subject to specified exceptions. If that event is the receipt of an offer for the sale or transfer the park that management intends to accept or the conditional acceptance of an offer for the sale or transfer of the park, the bill would require the notice to include a statement from management that it has received an offer for sale, lease, or transfer of the park that it intends to accept, a statement of the homeowners' rights under the bill and the deadlines for exercising those rights, and the price, terms, and conditions of the offer management has conditionally accepted or plans to accept. This bill would authorize a resident organization or its assignee, to, no later than 120 days after notice of an offer that management intends to accept or conditional acceptance of an offer is sent, deliver a good faith, written purchase offer for the park to management, along with a statement that the homeowners of more than 50% of the mobilehomes in the park support the purchase offer. This bill would require management to consider the resident organization's proposed purchase offer and negotiate with the resident organization in good faith to determine whether a mutual agreement can be reached that results in the resident organization purchasing the park, and, if the offer is rejected, provide a good faith reason for the rejection. This bill would, if the resident organization's proposed purchase agreement matches the price and substantially the same terms and conditions as the offer management has conditionally accepted or plans to accept, grant the resident organization the right to purchase the park at the price, terms, and conditions stated in its proposed purchase agreement. The bill would provide specified requirements and restrictions on management and the resident organization with regard to the proposed purchase agreement. This bill would authorize a resident organization that represents 50% or more of the homeowners of the mobilehome park to, at its election and subject to rescission at any time, assign its rights under the bill to the municipality in which the resident organization is located, a housing authority located in the municipality, a state agency, or a qualified entity for the purpose of continuing the use of the property as a park. The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to establish a process for certifying specified entities as qualified entities, as provided, and to maintain and update annually a list of qualified entities to be made available to management for the purpose of distributing notices to qualified entities. This bill would authorize a resident organization or public prosecutor, as specified, to bring an action against management that violates the bill for specified civil penalties and other relief. The bill would provide that its provisions shall be interpreted liberally and are severable.
Who sponsors CA SB 1092?
Allen is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1092, joined by 1 cosponsor.
Description
Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, requires the owner of a mobilehome park who lists for sale or offers to sell the mobilehome park to any party to provide written notice of the owner's intention to sell the mobilehome park to a resident organization formed by homeowners for purposes of converting the mobilehome park to condominium or stock cooperative ownership interests and for purchasing the mobilehome park, subject to specified conditions. This bill would repeal those provisions and would instead require management of a mobilehome park to give notice to each resident household in the park, resident organization, as defined, and specified public entities, as provided, if certain events demonstrating management's intent to sell occur, subject to specified exceptions. If that event is the receipt of an offer for the sale or transfer the park that management intends to accept or the conditional acceptance of an offer for the sale or transfer of the park, the bill would require the notice to include a statement from management that it has received an offer for sale, lease, or transfer of the park that it intends to accept, a statement of the homeowners' rights under the bill and the deadlines for exercising those rights, and the price, terms, and conditions of the offer management has conditionally accepted or plans to accept. This bill would authorize a resident organization or its assignee, to, no later than 120 days after notice of an offer that management intends to accept or conditional acceptance of an offer is sent, deliver a good faith, written purchase offer for the park to management, along with a statement that the homeowners of more than 50% of the mobilehomes in the park support the purchase offer. This bill would require management to consider the resident organization's proposed purchase offer and negotiate with the resident organization in good faith to determine whether a mutual agreement can be reached that results in the resident organization purchasing the park, and, if the offer is rejected, provide a good faith reason for the rejection. This bill would, if the resident organization's proposed purchase agreement matches the price and substantially the same terms and conditions as the offer management has conditionally accepted or plans to accept, grant the resident organization the right to purchase the park at the price, terms, and conditions stated in its proposed purchase agreement. The bill would provide specified requirements and restrictions on management and the resident organization with regard to the proposed purchase agreement. This bill would authorize a resident organization that represents 50% or more of the homeowners of the mobilehome park to, at its election and subject to rescission at any time, assign its rights under the bill to the municipality in which the resident organization is located, a housing authority located in the municipality, a state agency, or a qualified entity for the purpose of continuing the use of the property as a park. The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to establish a process for certifying specified entities as qualified entities, as provided, and to maintain and update annually a list of qualified entities to be made available to management for the purpose of distributing notices to qualified entities. This bill would authorize a resident organization or public prosecutor, as specified, to bring an action against management that violates the bill for specified civil penalties and other relief. The bill would provide that its provisions shall be interpreted liberally and are severable.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-13
- Latest action
- 2026-07-01 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Allenauthor
- Wahabcoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-07-01
July 1 hearing: Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.)
2026-07-01
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-06-24
June 24 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.)
committee-failure,committee-passage-unfavorable
2026-06-15
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-06-01
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
referral-committee
2026-05-26
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1
2026-05-26
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 7. Page 4445.) Ordered to the Assembly.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-05-14
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-05-14
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4264.) (May 14).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-05-12
Set for hearing May 14.
2026-05-11
May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
2026-05-04
Set for hearing May 11.
2026-04-23
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-04-22
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 3975.) (April 21).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-04-15
Set for hearing April 21.
2026-04-09
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-04-08
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on HOUSING. (Ayes 10. Noes 2. Page 3757.) (April 7).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2026-03-19
Set for hearing April 7.
2026-02-26
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HOUSING.
referral-committee
2026-02-17
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 16.
2026-02-13
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Housing]
2026-04-07 · pass · 10-2
Member-level votes (13)
- Wahab: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Allen: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Stern: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Valladares: no
- Niello: no
- Laird: other
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-04-21 · pass · 8-1
Member-level votes (10)
- Caballero: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Seyarto: no
- Grayson: other
Placed on suspense file
2026-05-11 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Cabaldon: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Wahab: yes
Do pass
2026-05-14 · pass · 5-2
Member-level votes (7)
- Wahab: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Dahle: no
- Seyarto: no
3rd Reading
2026-05-26 · pass · 29-7
Member-level votes (40)
- Cabaldon: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Wiener: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Stern: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Laird: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Allen: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Becker: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Limón: yes
- Strickland: no
- Valladares: no
- Seyarto: no
- Jones: no
- Choi: no
- Alvarado-Gil: no
- Grove: no
- Niello: other
- Dahle: other
- Grayson: other
- Gonzalez: other
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
2026-06-24 · fail · 6-4
Member-level votes (12)
- Wicks: yes
- Haney: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Lee: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Ávila Farías: no
- Tangipa: no
- Wilson: no
- Ta: no
- Patterson: other
- Ward: other
Reconsideration.
2026-07-01 · pass · 8-0
Member-level votes (12)
- Patterson: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Haney: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Ta: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Wicks: other
- Tangipa: other
- Lee: other
- Ávila Farías: other
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
2026-07-01 · pass · 7-5
Member-level votes (12)
- Lee: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Haney: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Patterson: no
- Wilson: no
- Tangipa: no
- Ávila Farías: no
- Ta: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1092. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.