Bill Commons

CA SB 1075

Status unknown

Air resources: toxic air contaminants: criteria air pollutants: community emissions reduction programs: local community emissions reduction plans.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 1075 pass?

The current status of CA SB 1075 is not known from the official record. Latest recorded action (2026-08-13): August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

What is CA SB 1075 about?

Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to prepare a statewide strategy to reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants and criteria air pollutants in communities affected by a high cumulative exposure burden that includes an assessment and identification of those communities. Existing law requires the statewide strategy to be updated at least once every 5 years. Existing law requires the state board, based on the assessment and identification, to select locations around the state for preparation of community emissions reduction programs. Existing law requires the assessment and identification to prioritize disadvantaged communities, as defined. Existing law requires the regional air quality management district or the regional air pollution control district encompassing the location selected by the state board, within one year of selection, to adopt a community emissions reduction program to achieve emissions reductions for the location selected using cost-effective measures, as provided. Existing law requires the state board to provide grants to community-based organizations for technical assistance and to support community participation in the implementation of the statewide strategy. Under this existing regulatory authority, the state board provides grants to development and implement local community emissions reduction plans. This bill would revise the definition of "disadvantaged community" to include a disadvantaged unincorporated community. By expanding the definition of "disadvantaged community," the bill would expand the duties of districts in the preparation of community emissions reduction programs, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the local community emissions reduction plans to be submitted to the state board for review and approval and would require the state board or the relevant air district to enforce those plans, as provided. The bill would specify that a steering committee formed by an air district to assist it in the development and implementation of a community emissions reduction program remains active until the emissions objectives identified in the program are achieved as determined by the air district or<caml:Numerator>2</caml:Numerator><caml:Denominator>3</caml:Denominator></caml:Fraction>"?> a majority of the members of the committee vote to disband the committee. The bill would require members of the steering committee to meet certain requirements. The bill would specify eligible uses for the grants provided. This bill would require the state board, on or before June 30, 2027, and annually thereafter, to report to the appropriate subcommittees of the budget committee of the Legislature about the progress the state board has made to implement the statewide strategy and the community emissions reduction programs, as provided. The bill would require the Secretary for Environmental Protection to periodically convene representatives of agencies and departments within the California Environmental Protection Agency with jurisdiction over pollution sources included in a community emissions reduction program to ensure coordination among those agencies and departments to address concerns raised about those pollution sources. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA SB 1075?

Reyes is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1075.

Description

Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to prepare a statewide strategy to reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants and criteria air pollutants in communities affected by a high cumulative exposure burden that includes an assessment and identification of those communities. Existing law requires the statewide strategy to be updated at least once every 5 years. Existing law requires the state board, based on the assessment and identification, to select locations around the state for preparation of community emissions reduction programs. Existing law requires the assessment and identification to prioritize disadvantaged communities, as defined. Existing law requires the regional air quality management district or the regional air pollution control district encompassing the location selected by the state board, within one year of selection, to adopt a community emissions reduction program to achieve emissions reductions for the location selected using cost-effective measures, as provided. Existing law requires the state board to provide grants to community-based organizations for technical assistance and to support community participation in the implementation of the statewide strategy. Under this existing regulatory authority, the state board provides grants to development and implement local community emissions reduction plans. This bill would revise the definition of "disadvantaged community" to include a disadvantaged unincorporated community. By expanding the definition of "disadvantaged community," the bill would expand the duties of districts in the preparation of community emissions reduction programs, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the local community emissions reduction plans to be submitted to the state board for review and approval and would require the state board or the relevant air district to enforce those plans, as provided. The bill would specify that a steering committee formed by an air district to assist it in the development and implementation of a community emissions reduction program remains active until the emissions objectives identified in the program are achieved as determined by the air district or<caml:Numerator>2</caml:Numerator><caml:Denominator>3</caml:Denominator></caml:Fraction>"?> a majority of the members of the committee vote to disband the committee. The bill would require members of the steering committee to meet certain requirements. The bill would specify eligible uses for the grants provided. This bill would require the state board, on or before June 30, 2027, and annually thereafter, to report to the appropriate subcommittees of the budget committee of the Legislature about the progress the state board has made to implement the statewide strategy and the community emissions reduction programs, as provided. The bill would require the Secretary for Environmental Protection to periodically convene representatives of agencies and departments within the California Environmental Protection Agency with jurisdiction over pollution sources included in a community emissions reduction program to ensure coordination among those agencies and departments to address concerns raised about those pollution sources. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
2026-02-13
Latest action
2026-08-13 — August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Reyesauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-08-13

    August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

  2. 2026-08-05

    August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  3. 2026-07-02

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  4. 2026-07-01

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (June 29).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  5. 2026-06-25

    Pursuant to Assembly Rule 51.

  6. 2026-06-25

    Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.

  7. 2026-06-25

    Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

    referral-committee

  8. 2026-06-25

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  9. 2026-05-27

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  10. 2026-05-27

    Amendments by Senator Strickland tabled on motion of Senator Ashby. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 4505.)

  11. 2026-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 4505.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  12. 2026-05-26

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  13. 2026-05-22

    Ordered to second reading.

    reading-1,reading-2

  14. 2026-05-22

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  15. 2026-05-18

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  16. 2026-05-14

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  17. 2026-05-14

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4264.) (May 14).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  18. 2026-05-12

    Set for hearing May 14.

  19. 2026-05-11

    May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  20. 2026-05-04

    Set for hearing May 11.

  21. 2026-04-23

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  22. 2026-04-22

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4014.) (April 22).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  23. 2026-04-15

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3900.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  24. 2026-04-14

    Set for hearing April 22 in L. GOV. pending receipt.

  25. 2026-04-09

    Set for hearing April 15.

  26. 2026-04-08

    Re-referred to Coms. on E.Q. and L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  27. 2026-03-25

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  28. 2026-02-26

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  29. 2026-02-17

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 16.

  30. 2026-02-13

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/13/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-13Compare
  • 03/25/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-03-25Compare
  • 04/23/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-04-23Compare
  • 05/14/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-05-14Compare
  • 05/22/26 - Amended Senate — 2026-05-22Compare
  • 06/25/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-06-25Compare
  • 07/02/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-07-02Compare
  • SB1075Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]

    2026-04-15 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Valladares: no
    • Dahle: no
  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-04-22 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Ashby: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Choi: no
    • Seyarto: no
  • Placed on suspense file

    2026-05-11 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Wahab: yes
  • Do pass as amended

    2026-05-14 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: no
    • Seyarto: no
  • 3rd Reading

    2026-05-27 · pass · 29-9

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Niello: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Choi: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Grove: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Jones: no
    • Grayson: other
    • Dahle: other
  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2026-06-29 · pass · 9-4

    Member-level votes (14)
    • Bryan: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Ellis: no
    • Hoover: no
    • Alanis: no
    • Macedo: no
    • Muratsuchi: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-28T20:39:31.888507Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1075. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.