CA SB 1036
enactedMitigation Fee Act.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 1036 pass?
Yes. CA SB 1036 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-06-30): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 54, Statutes of 2026.
What is CA SB 1036 about?
Existing law, the Mitigation Fee Act, imposes various requirements with respect to the establishment, increase, or imposition of a fee by a local agency as a condition of approval of a development project, including requiring the local agency to identify the use to which the fee is to be put and determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. This bill would require the amount of a fee that is imposed on a development project that demolishes or changes an existing use to be offset to account for the demolition or change so that the amount of the fee is attributable only to the development project's incremental impact on public facilities or services, as provided. Existing law provides that when a local agency imposes a fee for water connections or sewer connections, or imposes a capacity charge, as defined, those fees or charges shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge is imposed, except as specified. This bill would provide that when a change in the capacity of an existing water or sewer connection is proposed, a local agency, in calculating the estimated reasonable cost of a capacity charge, shall only calculate an amount attributable to the change in the capacity. If the existing capacity exceeds the proposed capacity, the bill would prohibit any amount from being refunded, credited, transferred, assigned, or otherwise applied to offset any other charge or fee.
Who sponsors CA SB 1036?
Grayson is the primary sponsor of CA SB 1036.
Description
Existing law, the Mitigation Fee Act, imposes various requirements with respect to the establishment, increase, or imposition of a fee by a local agency as a condition of approval of a development project, including requiring the local agency to identify the use to which the fee is to be put and determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. This bill would require the amount of a fee that is imposed on a development project that demolishes or changes an existing use to be offset to account for the demolition or change so that the amount of the fee is attributable only to the development project's incremental impact on public facilities or services, as provided. Existing law provides that when a local agency imposes a fee for water connections or sewer connections, or imposes a capacity charge, as defined, those fees or charges shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge is imposed, except as specified. This bill would provide that when a change in the capacity of an existing water or sewer connection is proposed, a local agency, in calculating the estimated reasonable cost of a capacity charge, shall only calculate an amount attributable to the change in the capacity. If the existing capacity exceeds the proposed capacity, the bill would prohibit any amount from being refunded, credited, transferred, assigned, or otherwise applied to offset any other charge or fee.
- Introduced
- 2026-02-11
- Latest action
- 2026-06-30 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 54, Statutes of 2026.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Graysonauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-06-30
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 54, Statutes of 2026.
became-law
2026-06-30
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2026-06-24
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
executive-receipt
2026-06-18
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
committee-passage
2026-06-18
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 61. Noes 0. Page 5760.) Ordered to the Senate.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-06-04
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-06-03
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 3).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-05-11
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
referral-committee
2026-04-27
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1
2026-04-27
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4066.) Ordered to the Assembly.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2026-04-16
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2026-04-15
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3904.) (April 15).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2026-04-08
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-04-02
Set for hearing April 15.
2026-02-18
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
referral-committee
2026-02-12
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 14.
2026-02-11
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass as amended
2026-04-15 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Cervantes: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Choi: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Laird: yes
- Arreguín: yes
3rd Reading
2026-04-27 · pass · 37-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Wahab: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Choi: yes
- Alvarado-Gil: yes
- Laird: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Becker: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Allen: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Limón: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Jones: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Niello: yes
- Stern: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Grove: yes
- Caballero: other
- Gonzalez: other
- Rubio: other
Do pass.
2026-06-03 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (10)
- Wilson: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Ward: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Ta: yes
SB 1036 Grayson Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio
2026-06-18 · pass · 61-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Fong: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Addis: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Ward: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Berman: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Ta: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Hart: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Papan: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Patel: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Lee: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Krell: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Solache: yes
- Davies: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Chen: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Gipson: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Alvarez: other
- Ellis: other
- Haney: other
- Johnson: other
- Muratsuchi: other
- Flora: other
- Tangipa: other
- Bonta: other
- Dixon: other
- Bennett: other
- McKinnor: other
- Bains: other
- Irwin: other
- Soria: other
- Valencia: other
- Celeste Rodriguez: other
- Wicks: other
- Ramos: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 1036. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.